I haven't had a good Pokémon debate in aaaaaaages. :3
Robbgobb
If Wizards are so good at the kid TCGs then why hasn't one of them taken the top spot? I know about them but Pokemon is the only one that has offered me any fun and Neopets is the only one I have ever seen played anywhere and that was one location.
That you can blame solely on the fact that Pokémon is Pokémon. Unfortunately though, I don't keep up to date at all on any card games (I barely keep up with Pokémon), so I don't have any other explination.
-------------
PokePop
Nick, I respect your opinions, but differ with you on a few points.
Well hey, I'm not trying to treat my opinions as fact. My opinions are based mostly just on what information I have under my belt, which doesn't say much about whether or not that information is spoiled or not.
However, while the 15+ removal was presented as initiated by Japan, I'm not sure I believe that anymore. I know that certain misbehaviors by older players triggered it, but I believe the trigger was pulled on the US side
From what I'm starting to remember, yeah, I do recall a lot of it having to do with misbehavior with the older players. However, I felt that it was Japan who was pushing for the "axe 15+" deal on Wizards, and I think it was rooted with how Japan saw their game versus how Wizards was presenting it. I felt that it was Wizards who chose to absorb the blame of the decision rather than pass it off on Japan, probably out of fear of even more red tape. I do remember the fall out of the decision, and, in hindsight, it still seems as if Japan was the big brains behind it and Wizards just tried to cover it up.
Wizards may have had some bad ideas, but I doubt Japan was absolutely without blame in any given decision. If they were the only ones behind axing 15+, it's obvious they realized it was a stupid decision since they revered it. (Of course we could get into conspiracy territory and say that they forced it upon Wizards so that when the license was transfered, Nintendo could reverse it and make them look like the saviors!)
In any case, I will easily agree that it was probably either a joint decision or something that Japan started and Wizards finished: Japan probably didn't like how older players were, for lack of a better phrase, destroying the dignity of the game, while Wizards used that "vibe" as a way to push older players into Magic or something. It's not like it matters any more! [shrugs]
Again, props to MT Mike for coming up with this, but it a stop gap for Wizards.
Lots of what Wizards did was stop-gaps. As I've said, I'd like to believe that it was basically because Wizards really couldn't do anything else, a sort of "rat in a corner" kind of situation. Not that I'm calling Wizards' a rat or anything, but I hope you get my drift.
I'll also agree that, in Wizard's limitation, the question was asked "well does anyone ELSE have any bright ideas?", to which the other bright ideas really weren't persued as intensely as they could have been. It's almost as if the staff was demoralized or something.
Neither WotC nor PUI have much to say about what kinds of cards or concepts are created or emphasized in the game. It's all out of PCL in Japan and that's that. Neither credit nor blame to either company for this kind of thing.
I wasn't claiming this to be a Wizards or PUI issue, but more of just an overall issue with the game itself. I've always had gripes with the game in terms of card design, that's one of the things that propelled my interest in faking.
While there is a PR promo for Jungle, I believe that was just given out at test leagues and there was no actual PR event for it. Correct me if I'm wrong on that.
I don't recall hearing anything about a Prerelease for Jungle. I mean there was a Prerelease card for Base Set, but no event for it either.
I'm willing to bet there was a good idea for a lack of Prereleased during Wizards' reign of things. A lot of it, I believe, had to do with the weird release dates Wizards had to deal with. I'll bet it's hard to get a Prerelease tournament going when Nintendo forces you to push the release of your next set to match when Nintendo's next new hot product is (e-Reader and Expedition is the best example).
We have WotC to thank for search cards saying "Basic Pokemon or evolution card" rather than just saying "Pokemon card". They felt people would get too confused if it just said Pokemon card because they're all Pokemon cards, right?
I agree there. Still, we're given the benefit of hindsight for a lot of this.
-------
SD PokéMom
compare that with the unique items for profs to earn under POP: polo shirt, t-shirt, hat, jacket, bag, notebook, card box, deck box, stopwatch, watch, stamped cards...
Wizards was dealing with Pokémon when it was Pokémon, the super hot new fad!!1! I'm more willing to bet that Wizards didn't have to grease the wheels much in that department to keep people on board. It's a bit different now, and the old tactics no longer apply.
Then there's the bit where all POP has to do is do what Wizards did, only better, and they're an instant favorite for us old tymers.
-------
Squirtle
I may not like all of the decisions the PUI makes, I may even flat out HATE some of them. You cannot dispute that which PUI has done by taking this game from what it was
No, no arguement there. Super props to PUI for being able to reinvigorate the game!
-------
ninetales1234
Shouldn't it be obvious that WotC representatives were lying when they said that the elimination of +15 division was an order from TPC?
From what I remember, it was the other way around, and that Wizards claimed that it was Wizards' own idea and Japan had nothing to do with it. I though THAT to be a lie and Japan had everything to do with it.
-------
Pkmnrulz240
I can pretty surely say I'd of been with the game all this time if they had received that renewal.
I think I'd still be out myself, however I think I would be paying more attention to it than I have been.
------
yoshi1001
Under POP, card wording is much more consistent than it was under WotC.
I must heartfully disagree. In doing fakes, I recognized a significant level of consistancy between cards from the entire Wizards' run (Base Set to Skyridge). Sure there have been a few minor ruling changes, some extremely small inconsistancies between text, and errors and such.... but overall Wizards did a good job of being as clear, precise and easy to read as possible. (The only really confusing card I ever saw was Neo Discovery Pineco.) Less can be said about, say, Yu-Gi-Oh, or Magic when it first came out, concerning consistant game text.
IF there were any ruling inconsistances, I would put that blame squarely on Japan for inventing really idiotic cards. Fossil Ditto is a nightmare, and then there's Suicune, but that's no fault of Wizards, now is it?
The only reason why POP's card wording is precise is probably they possess Wizards' wording guidebook.
Old-style babies were too powerful
Seriously, they should have done what I would have done was just make Baby's Basics and their Evolutions Stage 1 cards. Yes, I mean a Stage 1 Jynx, Electabuzz, Pikachu, etc. That way you get the choice of either a quick, Basic Electabuzz or a slower, more powerful Stage 1 Electabuzz.
------
Prof Clay
I do not understand the logic of not playing because WotC no longer runs things. I mean you are entitled to your opinion and all, but the game is huge right now.
Huge it may be, but it's more of an issue of preference of how it's being run. It's the little things, mostly. I reckon that if Wizards still ran the game, the EX series would have been split up into block sets, we'd have reprint sets, among other little things. Seriously, the reprint sets make a big difference for me and tournament play.
The game itself is more complicated than the early days and in my opinion requires much more skill to
be truly good.
Bloated it more like it. I still have issues with Pokémon-ex's and I'm sure Lv.X don't help much about my opinion. I feel that the design staff were incapable of putting on their thinking caps and just had to invent something COOOOOOL just to keep people buying and playing.
------
Don't get me wrong. POP is doing a good job with the game, if Wizards' isn't running it, I'm glad that it's in other good hands. However, I'm really just bit of a Wizards' apologist than anything else.
OK, that's all I got now.