I understand why this would be illegal. But is it ok to have a full deck of color-bordered-cards?
I have a friend who was best friends with one of the people who got DQ'd from this. The judges reviewed his deck, and through testing it and through subtle differences in how the edge was colored, they were able to get any card they wanted via the semi-reflectiveness of the Professor Sleeves.
Which sucked, as he was 3-0 when he got DQ'd. Also, he went one step further, and actually colored some of the card images, too. This made one guy misplay against him at BR, just because he didn't immediately recognize the card's picture.
Granted, I highly doubt he was trying to cheat, but I figured something like this would happen.
How much did he color on the card's picture?
I draw afros, smileys, and such on my Baltoys (and the moon in the Baltoy picture), but other than that most coloring should be fine.
He was DQ"d because the marker went to the top of the card and they told him it could be "marked" which is LUDACRIS since you can't look at them and if you did, I am sure it would be very noticable. So I am guessing if you do not run the marker onto the side, it is ok to do.
What part of "Don't color on your cards" do you not understand?? Sorry to sound harsh, but WHY risk a DQ a Nats or Worlds bc you want to make your cards "prettier"???? If you want to color, get a coloring book!
Keith
I do agree.
Worst part is, he colored on Rev. Foil Uxies and Claydols.
It makes me weep just thinking about it . . .