Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

Werewolf XVIII: Dimensional Clash: Wolves/Outlaws Win!

Agreed. So far, this back and forth banter between AT and vegitalian has managed to halt all other discussion and scumhunting, and if it keeps up, it will lead to people not wanting to post and get caught in between the two opposing forces by taking sides.

AT has made logical arguments, and as far as I've seen, vegitalian hasn't been able to refute them. But we can't let this dispute stop discussion.

...........

it leaves out the other 43 of us who are trying to scum hunt as well.

Personally, I think you've made your point against vegitalian, but if you really want to keep railing him just for the fun of it then there's really not much I can do to stop you.

Nothing I have done has stopped anyone else from scum-hunting. My conversation with vegitalian in no way, shape, or form, prevents anyone esle from having their own disscussions, doing their own scum-hunting, or participating in conversation. Any halting of disscussion has occured from people "watching" and not "talking." That's not my fault.
 
At this point I'm not even seeing you as scum, AT. I'm seeing you as dangerous and immature. Cut it out.

-You want me to cut out calling out Vegitalian? Why? I'm having fun and he's incriminating himself further. He started it by trying to start a smear campaign against me.

"He started it"? How childish.

-How is it useless conversation? I think we've learned a lot about Vegitalian from this.

We learned a lot about Vegitalian from his responses to pressure. We stopped learning things around the time he said he didn't care, and you embarked on this battle of utter fluff that has taught me only that you don't seem to have any regard for collateral damage, or the need of momentum to maintain active scumhunting. I'd be surprised if you really didn't understand this, so I hold out hope that there was some obscure purpose to your banter.

-Are you saying I should not have argued with Vegitalian? I went out of my way to accuse a person of being a wolf and they attempted to fight back by calling me a wolf, taking things I say out of context, lying, ignoring my points and accusation. I reacted accordingly and argued my point, countered his points, and countered 30 more of his points. I did nothing wrong.

You did do something wrong: you continued to defend yourself when there was nothing worth defending against. As a townie, you do not fear his offense (...right? Didn't you make that point against him earlier? scumpoints++?) I'd be amazed if you actually felt a need to respond for the sake of your livelihood in the game. I can appreciate that you were enjoying yourself, but at some point, it needed to end.

-Why should Vegitalian stop? he should keep going, maybe he'll save himself (doubtful). He said he was going to counter my points tomorrow and I expect him to. I then expect to tear those points apart to further incriminate him.

He should stop this pointless debate, bide his time, and respond once he's had a chance to collect his thoughts. That is exactly what he is doing.

-I’m trying to find and accuse a suspicious person of being a wolf. To me that’s useful conversation. What would you consider useful conversation? Apparently the accuser and the accused arguing is useless to you. Why is it useless exactly? Why do you want to stop the accused and accuser from arguing? That’s not very useful, in fact that seems to be the opposite of useful.

Oh, we agree on what would be useful, it's just that you are characterizing a conversation as "finding and accusing a suspicious person of being a wolf" when it's actually a game-within-a-game for you. You feel so comfortable and confident in your logic that you don't feel any need to hold back or reserve yourself. Well, so do the rest of us. You don't need to hammer it in any further. We get it. We'd like to talk about something else and make use of the rest of the game day.

It was useless because nothing new and helpful was being said. I thought that was obvious.

I can't wait for you to try to go back and justify individual portions of your posts with him that were relevant. Maybe you will really have a point, but more likely, you'll just decide I am your new playmate. But I've better things to do. Like hunt NEW scum.

What are people's thoughts on jpulice's very aggressive play today? I'm interested in not only him, but the fact that he seemed relatively ignored. AT's sudden aggression against Vegitalian actually really obscured what was otherwise a very risky and bizarre post that Jpulice made in response to me - I was actually severely ninja'd by the whole thing in my attempt to find an appropriate response. Surely some others saw this, right?
 
I can't wait for you to try to go back and justify individual portions of your posts with him that were relevant. Maybe you will really have a point, but more likely, you'll just decide I am your new playmate. But I've better things to do. Like hunt NEW scum.

You'll be waiting for a while. None of it if relevant, and I have no point other than to keep trolling him because it's fun.
You, my new playmate? Nah, we can't play, not yet.
New Scum? Nah I'll go after new scum after the old scum is dead, but as I stated before I'm not stopping you guys from debating anything else or talking about anything else. If I see something I can contribute to I will, but I see no point in posting for the sake of posting and trying to find something out of nothing. If I did that I could call about 15 people scum right now.
 
...so you're going to up and just decide not to contribute to the town anymore unless it suits your preferences and fancy? Fine, I guess, but really?
 
...so you're going to up and just decide not to contribute to the town anymore unless it suits your preferences and fancy? Fine, I guess, but really?

I never said that at all, don't put words in my mouth. I said I won't post for the sake of posting. I post when I have something worth saying to say. I'm not going to try and find something from nothing.
 
I might be guilty of the slang/acronym thing. If so, please let me know, and I'll try to be more clear. Likewise, if I am getting overly aggressive, I would appreciate it if someone let me know. I am not new to the game, but I am new to this forum, so I do not know the boundaries of the forum rules. If my walls are too much, that's not something I intend on fixing. A lot of stuff happens while I'm busy having a life.

That was a lot of votes in a short amount of time. Intentionally playing scummy to draw a wagon is also bad play - town does NOT know who other town is, and acting like that only serves to draw negative attention to yourself. This doesn't look good in my eyes - how would you know whether or not Vablakes is telling the truth regarding his "gambit"?

This is two things. The first sounds like a defense of a vote park. The second is a browser formatting fail, though I am not certain if this is Opera's fault or something else within the post.

This seems like it's grasping for reasons to suspect people. Why are you bringing up role confirmations when there's a lot of other things to discuss in-thread?

Where I come from, this is known as an empty post, because it contains nothing original. Unless you're ordered by the mod to vote a certain way, you're free to switch your suspicions.

Nitpicking over word choice? Didn't that get you in trouble earlier? I personally do not find putting dictionary definitions to be conducive to scumhunting, and the theory regarding G lander's post is extremely graspy. I can read the player list, and I see 44 other people besides myself; I will assume everyone else is capable of the same.

Confirming Forest meta.

Sounds like an excuse to push terrible wagons in the future, IMO. If Prohawk/Sheepbro were suspicious, I don't think I'd have to base it off of pregame silliness to build a case against them.

All I'm assuming about the wolves is that I need to get them lynched. I don't think worrying about when they can talk is conducive to finding them at the moment.

Why are you threatening a vote? If you think he's worth a vote, then vote him. It doesn't appear he's anywhere near a hammer.

Apparently, I posted too much last time, because I know I mentioned Glaceon.

This is known as "bussing". Are you sure you're new at this?

This does not give me a good feeling. He's still hanging on to the sub thing, and barely posting about all the stuff in-thread.

This reads like active lurking. If you thought he was town, saying something way back when would've been much more helpful, rather than admitting that you'd rather sit back and watch the fireworks.

AbsolTrainer gave a rather aggressive defense, but this strikes me as an extremely lazy response, coupled with yet another threat to vote. I don't like threats to vote - do it, add it to your FoS list or don't. DragonClyne's post (412) is an example of how to do it.

This post contains a contradiction in regards to Vablakes' read, and thus, I find it scummy.

What is your read on Crimsonsky? If he's town, then that entire bit you just posted about him makes no sense, because town does not win by lynching each other. I don't think he's worth a vote right now, because there's so much more going on.

This transition into a vegitalian vote is something I don't mind in the least. I don't agree with the Crimsonsky pointy finger right now, but I do agree that he's not the biggest fish to fry.

My favorite post of the Absoltrainer/vegitalian debacle. I'll weigh in on those two right below this sentence.

This needs to be expounded on. I can see you find vegitalian scummy, but when it gets to the point where others are asking you to tone it down, I suggest you listen to them. The other 43 of us have to read this, and an overly hostile tone makes rereading less than pleasant. I only get to post once a day, and it's during a time when very few people are around - the last thing I want to see is something that reminds me of the less-desirable games in the Forest. My emotions want me to vote Absoltrainer just to make the future days easier to read (which in turn is bad town play, because my goal is to lynch wolves, not people who make rereading difficult).

With that list being said. . .I'd like to see how vegitalian responds to Kayle, because Kayle's being the most reasonable party in that mess, IMO. Given what I see, I do not have any objections to lynching Vablakes right now for using the "intentional scummy" defense and for unhelpful word nitpicking, but I think there are other things that need my attention. I am suspicious of Sandslash7 for using pregame things in an attempt to find wolves, because this thread contains many more nuggets of information that he doesn't mention. Shinori's scum read is getting stronger because he promised a post and didn't bother; StrongRhino's sudden defense of Vablakes also strikes me as odd. I am having problems parsing PikaJewel, but at least she's taking the time to comment on things that are happening, which is better than PMysterious. Glaceon isn't off my scum list, but he claims he's got RL stuff to attend to, so I'm willing to see if he can post something more substantial between the busy times.

Unvote
Vote PMysterious


What are your thoughts on everything that's not a sub?

The rest of you aren't worth a vote at the moment.
 
Guys, just a reminder to separate gameplay critique and irrelevant insults, and cut the latter out.
 
I can see you find vegitalian scummy, but when it gets to the point where others are asking you to tone it down, I suggest you listen to them. The other 43 of us have to read this, and an overly hostile tone makes rereading less than pleasant. I only get to post once a day, and it's during a time when very few people are around - the last thing I want to see is something that reminds me of the less-desirable games in the Forest. My emotions want me to vote Absoltrainer just to make the future days easier to read (which in turn is bad town play, because my goal is to lynch wolves, not people who make rereading difficult).

Actually no one asked me to tone it down (until your post), they just called me a "little troll-child on a playground" and blamed me for the halt in discussion. The latter of course is not my fault in the least, and I won't accept blame for people watching rather than talking. People would rather I drop my argument and try to witch hunt people based on nothing, I don’t post for the sake of posting and no, I will not let up on vegitalian. He is the enemy and must be defeated.
 
(last post read: #407)

Trying to crumb something, Sheepbro? Are you trying to suggest that you're a vig?

Maybe I'm just overthinking things. . . .
No I'm not and yes you are.

I'm with Eclipse on the matter of PMysterious. There's a very simple word for what PM is doing which I won't use because wordfilter, but it boils down to his posts being a whole bunch of nothing.
Pokemonplayer101 did the same thing but has become slightly better by now.
Vablakes' defence was decent-ish, but he's definitely still on my radar. But hey,
UNVOTE: Vablakes

Mr. vegitalian, could you please start countering points? You're not even defending yourself at this point. You haven't posted a single relevant thing until you posted that list of who defended who (and even that wasn't very relevant).
Mr. Absoltrainer. Stop being so... behind-hurt about it. Yes, vegitalian is scummy and yes his points are stoopid, but there's no reason to argue for the sake of arguing.

Kayle, you must be female, you have the name of an angel in League of Legends!
 
Mr. Absoltrainer. Stop being so... behind-hurt about it. Yes, vegitalian is scummy and yes his points are stoopid, but there's no reason to argue for the sake of arguing.

Oh I'm hardly arguing for the sake of arguing. I'd say I'm arguing because I'm taking down scum.
 
Ok. I first noticed this post during the freeze, and since then have been unavailable to get the time to comment on it (asking for a bump in my timezone apparently doesn't work so well...)

I have not read most of page 12 yet.

Benzo has already iterated a lot of what I'm going to say. But I think it was too readily dropped. The first few sentences in particular caught my eye.

It basically comes down to 3 things.

1) Pointless post expanding fluff
2) Alright townies, follow me. (Ala Cabd last game)
3) Scum Talk

Comments in bold


Oh, I should probably slip some real content here in the end. Hmm, I know, lets buddy up to someone giving a public slight town read on day 1.


Vote: Tables

For reasons stated above.
Providing unnecessary content to chew up discussion time and make post appear bigger,
Attempting to lead or direct the town by playing the helpful friendly guy,
Speculating a bit too heavily about unknown scum information.


Oh and I'm also going to quickly agree with DP in that townies are more likely to fake impeds that wolves. Combined with the new warning system, I don't think we have anything against scorri.

I've already addressed all of these points. Most of them are pretty asinine (like, most times you post, that rule about not posting acronyms people might not know comes up, and you're jumping on me for naming an acronym people might not know? Riiight), and I won't be addressing them again.

Sorry for not being active up until now- Salem OR. Cities today= staffed.


So- Tables, you reply with:



Who is "We" that you mean? Like, me and you? you belive you have satisfied my need to have some clarification? Please do not assume that "we" just need to move on, because you IMO have given a weak defense and a push off reply left with the stentch of scummyness to this point......

We meaning everyone. And I never mentioned 'we' in my defence. It was part of the original post.

Speaking of assuming: A typo? You assume of yourself that you made a typo? How does that work? You either do or do not mean something, I do not know any one who has assumed anything on themselves when it comes to meaning anything they say. Sorry, but, assume on your own meaning for what you meant to type-- ugh, I am now even more confused with what your trying to say with out making an assumption of my own with out doubting myself to my own meanings...... this comes off to me as "Nothing here to see folks, move along"

I'm sorry, so you remember perfectly everything you said a few days ago and exactly what you mean? I tend to rush thoughts out in Mafia games, as it's better to have more information and more thoughts floating around than just making short, carefully worded replies. The former is town behaviour, the latter is scummy, because town don't have anything to hide. You're drawing all the wrong conclusions from this.

If your simply saying this, why say it so early? And you need to double check what it was you said? So, what, you can clarify that too? Or self assume you mean something else as well? If there happens to be Two teams, hopefully we can spot it out, not start the game of thinking that we need to look for something that is not there or that it is possible, since the main point of hunting is to find wolves, and if something not so town friendly happens to come about- we then need to look at the new threats as well. Just because this game has so many players in it, does not mean that it is time to just toss out "possible" or implant the hint that some other team is needing to be sought out right off. UNLESS you are already aware that like in your role that there is a threat to your team, or some sort of competition- your wording on things is interesting and puzzling- and the way that your acting is above suspiciouse to me. Until your meanings and wording stops looking so, what- hinting that you do know more then the simple roles or major roles that have yet to come about- I just don't like this at all.

As you clearly haven't read my post in context, I was responding to the question I quoted in the very post.

And "if I can be bothered"- bothered how? like having to go out of your way to hunt? This right here is leaning to my mind thinking that it could be true that you know a good amount- and that amount looks rather high in the suspicion side of things. Agian, your words not sitting right with me....

To check exactly what I'd said at the time. I'm a busy person (as I mentioned when I signed up), checking back three pages to put something I said exactly into context isn't the top of my priorities at the moment.

Then:



Another thing you feal you do not need to bother to do?

Sorry, but as of the time I am typing this- you have not posted again since. Why?
I am not the only player to see some sort of fishy scummyness in your words. why not reply to them as well?

FearThePika has asked me to play, so I shall play. As an advanced warning, I will likely be vaguely inactive until mid December.

Look- take my request of asking for some clarification. Even go as far as to say that I am role fishing, and give a fluff reply with rule/guidelines of how game mechanics work, which anyone can find on the internet. And for a person who has so much experiance in this game, it seems a bit odd that you would simply sluff off the notion of me simply just needing to "be happy" with your reply- looking even more like your trying to avoid any more discussion about what it is your really meant versus what you said.

I'm not trying to avoid discussion, but I do find it frustrating that people are taking my post out of context and then picking holes with the now out-of-context post. I generally don't bother defending myself much as town, but this game I've been under so much pressure just from trying to get people moving that I haven't had a choice.

You can say that I am nit-picking at your words, and trying to twist them- but really, I asked for clarification and I am simply not happy with your reply, let alone what it is your saying.

I was going to bold my vote for Rhino- (3DS won't bold)- but, this is a gut feeling that your just not good for the town.

Vote: Tables


Also, what is the deal with the ##vote? Is this another "site thing" that the players do there? I thought that all that was needed to do was to just bold with simple "vote"- so, some one please explain this ##vote thing?

My vote stands for now, I just really am having a hard time trying to get what it is your saying, Tables.

## Is how Serenes Forest votes. The idea being the mod can just search ## and find every vote, unvote, ask for clarification etc., It's a good system. Hopefully I've answered your points now. I really wish I had a little more time to answer more clearly, but right now, I don't.

And I know you're probably going to take not having enough time as a scumtell, right, even though I stated I wouldn't pre-game?

I've skimmed to the end, and it seems some people are now defending me, which is interesting.
 
I really like Eclipse right now. Strong scumhunting/Investigation/research, along with pro-town post setup.


Absol, if you want to continue to pound on Vegitalian and you think he is a wolf, condense your points into one post with numbered list (with links if necessary) and make it concise. That way he can respond well (or not) and the investigation can be concluded (or put on hold).

Just because you say you haven't stopped other conversation doesn't mean you haven't stopped other discussion. You know as well as or better than most of the village that if there is a huge back-and-forth going that other conversation will cease and let it play out.



Diaz ~ What happened to this? You say you'll be on the lookout for those who fall through the cracks. But to me it looks like you are one of those who is in the crack.
This is a pretty decent post. But 1/4 isn't great. Lets hear some of what you think about Vegitalian.

Vegi ~ You actually need to deal with the points Absol is bringing up.

DC725 ~ Thats fine. I personally use suspicious if I suspect (moderately) someone of being a wolf. As I said earlier, I'm not there for Tables.
 
Eclipse... this is more of a housekeeping issue, but I think I speak for the majority when I say your posts are annoyingly difficult to read.

I would much prefer you either just quote whole posts that you are commenting on OR give us some verbal cues so we know who/what you are talking about. When you hyperlink "this" with commentary following, we have no idea what you are talking about without clicking the link which is more work and more time consuming than necessary. Your points and ideas are more likely to be missed as well.

Now onto the point of Crimsonsky. In my post I said the likelihood he is gambiting as scum is greatly increased with the revelation of his experience. Do I think he is scum? Quite possibly. If I thought he was town, you are indeed correct, I would not have made the post on him. Do I think he needs to be lynched today? Not at all.

We all need to understand that he is dangerous to our victory. He cannot live to end-game because there is no way to gain any concrete information on him.You can launch a crusade against me for wanting to lynch CrimsonSky based on his role claim alone, but its the smart play. Hopefully we won't need to take it to that point and can lynch the wolves before we need to take care of CrimsonSky (assuming that he is in-fact not a wolf), but the fact remains that he is dangerous.
 
Diaz ~ What happened to this? You say you'll be on the lookout for those who fall through the cracks. But to me it looks like you are one of those who is in the crack.
This is a pretty decent post. But 1/4 isn't great. Lets hear some of what you think about Vegitalian.

Good on you for calling me out on it. It's a valid complaint. I've found it difficult to get back into the flow of things. I wanted to go through everything I missed, but it's just too many posts. I'm gunna jump in on recent stuff and back fill on stuff as we go. Don't worry, I'll be posting more than many players will like this game :thumb:

On the vegitalian. He went after me early, with a misguided vote. He was claiming that my "everyone should post more" mentality wasn't in the town's best interest. That is simply not true. Anyone with questions should look at the last 'gym game.

That said, I don't really get the scum read that other players seem to be getting. I think he hasn't played very well, and I don't think that will change. AT and others can and will out argue him. That's obvious. But that doesn't make them right. What I see is a lot of players jumping on an easy target.

What I think we have here is something I'll call the "Otaku" syndrome. On these forums Otaku will out argue anyone on any issue (on any side of each issue). He's just that good at internet arguments. That doesn't make him right. He'll beat anyone at an argument about card interactions/theory, but if he was actually right all the time, he'd do better in tournaments than he does. This is what I see with Veg. He'll lose the arguement, but I'm not convinced by the people who are arguing that he's scum.

@Absol and others with votes on Veg - spend less time arguing with Veg directly. Spend more time trying to get others to see what you see. Winning an argument with him isn't the point, but it seems your spending a lot of time on it. Finding out whether he's actually scum and convincing others once you do is the point. Keep that goal in mind when you post.
 
hey sorry i have been busy with school i will try to post more this weekend sorry if i seem bad but just been super busy i can post today
 
Jelly said:
Also, I think that you need to start taking a different approach with your defense, because saying that you were attempting a gambit is not working. At least not with me. Why should we assume that you are telling the truth? A few pages back, you started saying that you had a plan, (or something like that) and that you were telling us that so we would know that it was true when you revealed what it was. This however is not what happens in a situation like that. Unless you had said that you were playing like that intentionally before anyone questioned you, you could be lying. We have no way to disprove what you are saying, but we don't have any way to prove it either.
I’m not defending anyone here, but wouldn’t that be the whole point of any plan like this? I might not understand the gambit, but if he revealed before anyone questioned/voted him, then how could he get any info from that at all? You gambit, get people to jump on your back, then say your plan, and then state your suspicions. If you gambit, then immediately say your plan, then I don’t see how that would work. (And when I say “you,” I’m talking about anyone in general, not pointing at jellyfisher).
Then again, I’ve never done a successful gambit before, so what do I know?
HumanDestroyer said:
Why are you nitpicking for small details to find scum? If you aren't, please correct me, it just seems like you are.
Ummm…hello? Yes, that is exactly what we as a town want to do. We have to get right down into every little nitpicky detail in order to find all the wolves (that is unless we have some sort of super genius seers at the end of the game).

@Kayle Post #623—I’m still suspicious of HD, but what is wrong with posting suspicions. The only difference between him and the majority of players is that he is doing his suspicions in an organized, listed manner instead of just responding as people post.

@scorri post #634—Yes, well kind of, this is how the games I’ve played on the gym are. Big lists of posts, from what I can tell, have not distinguished the difference between town/scum. PM made a list of his thoughts on everyone last game, PM was town, and I think he actually ended up nailing 1-2 of the wolves (unless my memory is hazy).

@ JP---Did you ever respond to my response to your post? If you did, forgive me, as I did not see it.

@Absol—Wow, I did not pick up on any of that on vegitalian until you pointed it out. I’m definitely going to have to go over his/her posts. But I also will agree with diaz that you will indeed have the ability to out argue just at least half the people here (I think that’s a good thing, by the way, it means you are going to be posting a lot)

@Prohawk post #421—concerning crimsonsky, I did have the deoxys role in AT’s game. I had an 85% chance of dodging a non-killing role targeting me, 15% chance of seeing them, and 50% chance of dodging a killing role, if that helps your investigation any.

@Vegitalian Post #453—I’m afraid to say that Absol is very much correct. You have gone way out of your way to NOT counter his points. Thus, making you look wolfy. Although, I suppose the fact that Absol is a very good writer doesn’t help your ability to argue against him.

Diaz said:
@Absol and others with votes on Veg - spend less time arguing with Veg directly. Spend more time trying to get others to see what you see. Winning an argument with him isn't the point, but it seems your spending a lot of time on it. Finding out whether he's actually scum and convincing others once you do is the point. Keep that goal in mind when you post.
I second this.
 
@Absol and others with votes on Veg - spend less time arguing with Veg directly. Spend more time trying to get others to see what you see. Winning an argument with him isn't the point, but it seems your spending a lot of time on it. Finding out whether he's actually scum and convincing others once you do is the point. Keep that goal in mind when you post.

Major QFT. This is exactly why I feel AT's huge firestorm with Vegitalian was a waste of our time.

I'm sorry that calling you a troll-child-on-playground didn't communicate exactly what I meant. I was very frustrated at that moment, and I liked the mixture of slang and metaphor, so I went for "You're being a childish troll who smugly tells people off for bad reasons on a playground at recess" which was shortened into... yes.

Regardless, you are behaving as I predicted: finding nitpicky reasons to belittle other peoples' criticisms of you as if you somehow being "right" improves your credibility. As I see it, you would improve your credibility by dropping Vegitalian for now and being a little more productive elsewhere. Alternatively, you can turn the discussion to us instead of him. Yelling matches teach us nothing.


Firstly, to Eclipse. I'm less suspicious of Vegitalian now. He seems like a victim of poor early gameplay. He was really goaded into a lot of negative or subpar responses by AT, so I don't want to read too strongly into their exchange yet. (Also it's painful to read, as you noted.)

Sheepbro, sometimes I think that myself. Though, not because I a happen to share a username with a LoL character. :rolleyes:

Next I want to briefly post all of the players I find suspicious, and try to figure out why. I have kept very quiet about it for now, but I am getting more and more sure that I'm on to something with every passing page.

Firstly, jpulice still reads about medium scum to me. This post is pretty strong, and one of the reasons I doubt myself, but he seems so determined to go after H_D for some reason while I am making some of the same errors and plays as H_D is and yet he doesn't seem to care. More relevantly, there's this; I only quoted and responded directly to the portion addressed to me. The H_D portion is strangely hostile and doesn't seem to accomplish much except jabbing H_D for reasons I don't think deserve a jab. But the next paragraph - so provocative. There was nothing in that post that could have contributed to anything unless I bit the hook and got mad about it. Maybe I'm missing something, but why would a townie go for these sorts of tactics? We townies don't want to lynch someone by riling them up and making them make mistakes. That's a very wolfy tactic and not remotely a town-aligned one as I see it. Wolves also would have a good bit to fear from me, I think, but I don't want to inflate my own ego here. I GUESS he could be trying to rile out a scum read on me or something but that seems a little far-fetched, since I felt like I'd kind of established myself well as town-aligned early on?? My inexperience shows.

Assuming jpulice IS scum, which I already know is a bad assumption to make, but ASSUMING that, Absoltrainer reads strong scum to me, and otherwise reads low-medium scum. My reasoning is here. The post itself isn't important -but scroll up. Immediately before this otherwise very abrupt subject change, jpulice was doing his acting-weird-and-trying-to-come-off-as-aggressive-townie thing. IF jpulice is scum and IF he was pressuring me because he felt threatened by me, then Absoltrainer might have tried to change the subject forcefully to defend a valuable ally, then gone on a massive two-page tirade against Vegitalian in order to try to drive the discussion out of our minds. This is an argument based on assumption, so I can't act on it, but it's one that I can't help but find very interesting. If it had just been the sudden "I'm going to vote Vegitalian" and then nothing else, I might not have been so intrigued. It's that, in combination with last night's argument, that has me worried.

If jpulice is not scum, I still read moderate scum on Absoltrainer just because so far as I've been able to see his votes have all been "I'm late on the bandwagon guys!" except Vegitalian, and I had mentioned twice already that I found him suspicious (I don't think I'm the only one). Further, AT's posts are all combatative and are either directly responding to other members in a primarily defensive way, or trying to rile them up in a more hostile aggressive way. He posted a fairly well-intentioned post that, taken alone, isn't fishy, but Vablakes is such an easy target and there were already FOUR other votes on him in that page. Similar logic followed for AT's vote on Human_Destroyer; it was one of the first major scumhunting posts we had, but think about where the discussion has taken us from there and how disorienting it must have been for the people H_D might have intended to help (if he was town).

All in all AT's play is easy for me to place as strong wolf play, but harder for me to imagine as strong town play. I don't like anything about that.

Sandslash7 is on my suspect list. He, like vegitalian, is staying reserved in his posting, trying not to contribute to any controversial or high-profile discussions in favor of making small, pointed arguments that are difficult to refute and, perhaps, don't register as worth the effort. His attacks on people are very nitpicky, but this itself doesn't seem scummy to me - it actually strikes me as a good scumhunting strategy: nitpick on people for silly reasons and see if they get way too defensive. If so, pursue them further. (He says about as much in this post.) I don't have as strong a read on him as I do AT and jpulice, but I'm wary of him nonetheless.

We have a large number of lurkers, but with a game as large as this one I fear that may be unavoidable. Still, I'm wondering where StrongRhino went in particular. He sure seemed excited to be going after Human_Destroyer, and the fact that he's dead silent now that H_D isn't the top lynch pick anymore strikes me as odd.

Would finally like to add that all of Eclipse's questions are good because I'm kind of ignoring that crowd, but that's the power of the town: we've got a lot more eyes and ears to utilize (and typing fingers!) so we should make the most of that advantage!
 
If jpulice is not scum, I still read moderate scum on Absoltrainer just because so far as I've been able to see his votes have all been "I'm late on the bandwagon guys!" except Vegitalian,

Explain this.
I voted three time
Once for Human Destroyer, once for Vablakes, once for Vegitilian.

You say that my first two votes are "i'm late to the bandwagon guys?"

-Vote for Human Destroyer
-I am the fourth person to vote
-I come at the case in an entirely different angle than the three peoppe before me, defend all my points
http://pokegym.net/forums/showpost.php?p=2362265&postcount=215


-Vote for Vablakes
-After Vablakes has one vote, I note this:
http://pokegym.net/forums/showpost.php?p=2362668&postcount=309
-After reading his responses and reviewing his post, I decide to vote, I am the fifth person to vote for hi
http://pokegym.net/forums/showpost.php?p=2362777&postcount=320


-Vote for Vegitilian
-I was actually the second person to vote for him, but the first to start a major campaign against him
-http://pokegym.net/forums/showthread.php?p=2363240#post2363240



Now you said that last one isn't included, which means you think my first two votes are bandwagon votes. Please elaborate.
 
Back
Top