6 corners?

[djjoe227]

Yes but not from him I know him in person
Posted with Mobile style...

That's really not an excuse to be posting like that though. Whether you know him or not, he's trying to help. Take it or leave it, most people don't care what you end up choosing, but the least you could do is acknowledge it. Even a "Thank you" wouldn't kill anyone.

Also, in a straight battle 1 Virizion should knock out 2 Kyurem. Glaciate is only doing 10 damage to an active Virizion, and Outrage is only matching damage counters, and that's if you decide to leave it out there. That's also ignoring Eviolite, Pluspowers (if any) and played Pokemon Catchers from your end.

Kyurem is also the only dragon of the three that can't outright knock out a Virizion. Glaciate doesn't hit for 120 in one go like the others do.

 

[the cheating bidoof]

Does this deck have a good ross matchup? If not, what could be done to improve it?

 

[jeffrey123]

I made an article that I am waiting for the moderators to post. It will answer all of your questions

 

[Patsfan112892]

after testing the deck it works but just isnt my thing i guess

i like chandelure better

 

[jjkkl]

after testing the deck it works but just isnt my thing i guess

i like chandelure better

Glad all this fumbling around wasn't in vain.

 

[Patsfan112892]

So you say you're not netdecking, but you aren't satisfied with a basic list that you can modify yourself. You really want a list that already has the techs you need included for you.

But your're not netdecking.

Of course not. How dare anyone say that.

net decking would be taking a list i get off the internet and copying it card for card thats not what im doing read 1st post i say an idea where to start

 

[Redados1]

But we juet gave you aesas list, which mentions coballion as an option.
Posted with Mobile style...

 

[HornetsBasketballFan]

net decking would be taking a list i get off the internet and copying it card for card thats not what im doing read 1st post i say an idea where to start

False. Netdecking is taking a even a basic list, from any source. Changing up to 5 cards, not testing it, and playing it.

 

[baby mario]

I don't believe there is an official definition of 'netdecking'.

Some people would say that only taking a card-for-card list off the internet is netdecking.

The extremists would say that even taking an idea from an internet article is netdecking.

It's funny how people think netdecking is wrong but having a friend give you their list is fine. I don't think it's anyone's place to judge people for where they get their lists.

But the issue here is that the OP was given a great place to start from, but then complained because it wasn't exactly what he needed, when the proper thing to do would be to playtest the different options for himself. It's the lack of effort that's a bit sad imo, not the netdecking.

 

[Haunter_FanBoy]

i don't think anything is wrong with netdecking. you still have to play ya know.

 

[Excalibar]

This thread says "Six Corners". Oddly enough, it DOES NOT say anything about net decking. So, what say we put this thread back on track, stop arguing over deck methods, and start discussing what this thread is actually about?