lolganium
New Member
You keep saying you outspeed champ, but there's really no concrete proof of this.
AMU's claim is that it can get set up t2-3 consistently.
I'd say that in practice it does this about 50-60% of the time.
Machamp can get out just as quickly (you don't even NEED candy to get set up quickly) - stage 2 decks have always tended to be slower than basic/stage 1 decks, but this is primarily due to energy costs. Machamp's attack costs less than Mesprit's.
And I still laugh at people who say a deck can beat most decks in the format when the format doesn't even exist yet.
uh... br's are already going on dude. a meta-game, no matter how shallow, exists.
mesprit? mesprit? i dont need mesprit, you got +30 weakness, i can just plow away with anything else and i out-consistancy you... you lose. T1 should be 30 and sleep ideally, or in macops case 40 and sleep... thats quite severe for turn 1 tbh... and unown G is played in AMU, the people you play against with the deck must have just sucked tbh. but champ wont work, AMU isnt even the most popular deck, and this is pretty much an anti-AMU deck. what do you do against kingdra? level up? fold? either way you've lost before you've even sat down.