NoPoke
Active Member
Well since I've been given permission to start a poll here it is..
=====
some background can be found here http://www.pokegym.net/showthread.php?t=3729
On the face of it the change doesn't seem that big but it has potentially sweeping consequences. I've tried to make the question as neutral as possible so as not to unduely influence the vote.
I don't think that the new meta-game rule improves the game at all in addition to bringing up all sorts of difficulties about how much it is reasonable to expect a player to remember. In additionion it has sweeping consequences for many of the rullings within the compendium. Anyone care to rewrite it? The Compendium looses much of its usefullness if rulings cannot be relied upon.
My vote...
NO ! give us back our strategy!
I see no problem with leaving the option for a free search of your deck or a shuffle that many trainers have as a part of their function. Most of the time you won't use it, so why take it away?
Q> Are you happy with the restriction that you cannot play a trainer unless you can comply with all its actions?
=====
some background can be found here http://www.pokegym.net/showthread.php?t=3729
On the face of it the change doesn't seem that big but it has potentially sweeping consequences. I've tried to make the question as neutral as possible so as not to unduely influence the vote.
I don't think that the new meta-game rule improves the game at all in addition to bringing up all sorts of difficulties about how much it is reasonable to expect a player to remember. In additionion it has sweeping consequences for many of the rullings within the compendium. Anyone care to rewrite it? The Compendium looses much of its usefullness if rulings cannot be relied upon.
My vote...
NO ! give us back our strategy!
I see no problem with leaving the option for a free search of your deck or a shuffle that many trainers have as a part of their function. Most of the time you won't use it, so why take it away?
Last edited: