Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

Bad deck

Status
Not open for further replies.
...Troll. You really need to stop this. If you aren't a troll, then I am truly sorry for calling you one. Try to pick one or two pokemon and base it around that.
 
?????????????????:confused::confused::confused::confused: I just like doing this deck its fun:biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin:
(P.S. This deck has been tested and it works!!!! Beat all four world championships decks!!
 
rayquaza2222 said:
(P.S. This deck has been tested and it works!!!! Beat all four world championships decks!!
Click to expand...

Wha..wha..wha..what?
Who were playing the decks? They sound like they don't really know what they're doing. You really should look at those decklists printed on the back of the boxes. It should help you out a bit.

Over 30 people have told you in all your different threads that you need to stick to one or two pokemon lines, but all you've done is add more. This deck is way too slow and will never win a bo3 match because it's way too inconsistent. You have no draw power, you lines are a mess, and you only run 2 of your starter.

Sorry for lashing out on you, but you need to start listening, this has to be the fifth time I've told you the same thing.
 
This deck is not good for competitive play what-so-ever!

This deck is interesting how ever...

---------- Post added 01/22/2011 at 08:08 PM ----------

Ahhh what am I saying!

This deck is just ridiculous!!! But interesting at the same time!
 
ME I TESTED IT WIH MY SISTER!!!!!!!! THE DECK IS SUPER STRONG, BUT MUST BE CAREFULLY PLAYED! ONE WRONG PLAY FROM THE HAND OR WITH THE POKEMON MAY MEAN GAME OVER!:mad:
 
1/1 Suicune and Entei Legend T/B
1 Cyndaquil
1 Quilava
1 Typhlosion Prime
1 Infernape 4
1 Infernape 4 Lv.X
1 Charmander
1 Charmeleon
1 Charizard
1 Totadile
1 Croconaw
1 Feraligatr Prime
1 Squirtle
1 Wartortle
1 Blastoise
2 Spirittomb
1 Teddiursa
1 Ursaring
1 Chansey
1 Blissey
1 Whismur
1 Loudred
1 Exploud
1 Bagon
1 Shelgon
1 Salamence
1 Salamence Lv.X
1 Burned Tower (Stadium)
4 Bebe's Search (Supporter)
3 Interviewer's Questions (Supporter)
1 Profssor Oak's New Theory (Supporter)
2 Rare Candy (Trainer)
1 Pokemon Communication (Trainer)
1 Memory Berry (Tool)
3 Expert Belt (Tool) :setAR:
3 Double Colorless Energy
6 Fire Energy
6 Water Energy

I'll post a basic pokemon list for each semi playable attacker. you pick one of them, and I'll give you the trainers and energy.

4-3-4 Charizard
2-2-2 Typhlosion
1-1 Ninetales(Don't Question it)
4 Tomb
2 Uxie
1 Q


4 Tomb
3-2-3 Blastoise(2 Pt Toise 1 GS)
2-2-2 Gatr
2-1 Uxie
1 Azelf
1 Crobat
1-1 Floatzel GL
1 Q

4-4 Ursaring
2-2 Ninetales
2-2-2 Typlosion
2-1 Uxie
1 q
1 Azelf

4-3-2/1-1 Salamance (2 Ar 1 Sf)
4 Tomb
2-2 Delcatty Pt
2-1 Uxie
1 Q
1 Azelf

Now plz pick one, so we can get all this over with.
 
How good of a player is your sister?
Has she made any accomplishments pokemon wise?
I'm sorry, but I just find it hard to believe that this deck could beat all four of those decks.
Just curious, you did play more than one game against each deck, right?

I know I'm being harsh, but when I first started playing, I had wildly inconsistent decks, but I won against the bad players in my league, so I thought my deck was good. One of the good players at the league tryed to help me fix my deck, and I wouldn't listen to what he was saying. Remove my 1-1-1 walrein, 1-1-1 Empoleon, 1-1-1 infernape, and 1-1-1 venesaur, and make my 1-1-1 torterra and 1-1-1 machamp lines thicker and focus the deck around them only? Ridiculous. He then sighed and challenged me to a few games. I lost every single one. I startedvtaking his advice, and started doing much better because I had a better, more consistent deck. Even if you don't believe it, you shold try to just focus on one or two lines.

EDIT: I got ninja'd :C
 
Last edited:
At Mama LuigiSo true. Though I like to think that I knew everything. I knew what cards were good(RareCandy, Uxies etc), all from coming form YGO. Just potenitally drawing 7 cards is GOOD, god I love this game. :p

---------- Post added 01/22/2011 at 04:23 PM ----------
Pikachews said:
You are Hilarious!
Click to expand...

I can't tell if he's trolling. btw i got ninjad.
 
rayquaza2222 said:
ME I TESTED IT WIH MY SISTER!!!!!!!! THE DECK IS SUPER STRONG, BUT MUST BE CAREFULLY PLAYED! ONE WRONG PLAY FROM THE HAND OR WITH THE POKEMON MAY MEAN GAME OVER!:mad:
Click to expand...

Do you have redshark? If you don't, is there any way you could download it? Cause this is getting ridiculous, I jut want to show you that this deck does not work. If I can play you on redshark some time, that would be great, you need to realize that this simply won't work. I'll play any deck from this list that you like:
Charizard (Although I hate the thing)
Luxchomp
Dialgachomp
Gyarados (Again, hate the thing)
Gengarplume
Machamp

Redshark Link
 
rayquaza2222, They are all right when saying, the is inconsistent. You need to focus on at least 1-2 lines and only those. You need to put in cards to help out those lines. Right now, I don't know if any one agrees but, this deck to me is more inconsistent then my donchamp. So please, I beg of you, take their advice.
 
I'm going to agree with several people above me when I say that your list looks inconsistent. I think the deck would be better off focusing on 1-2 lines, and some draw power in the form of Uxie would also be nice. Also, since you are running a Stage 2 deck, I would advise more Rare Candies.
 
Everybody, just leave this be. It's utterly inconsistant and bad, so find decks that need more help than this giant piece of troll. Thanks.
 
So, if the players an average deckbuilder, it would be better to help them than if they were a poor deckbuilder?
Because that's terrible logic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top