Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

Beedrill G: The Fun Rogue Donk Deck

I tried the deck and it was really good. Although it is a little more effective if you take out 2 Night teleporter and 2 Pokedex and ad 1-1 Blaziken FB LV.x and 2 fire energy. All and all a good deck though. :thumb:
 
Seekers will be great in this deck, Porii. As well as Junk Aarm - reuse SSU, and no supporter for turn... oh yeah.
 
It's pretty safe to say that after the PlusPower ruling that this is a better version of Shuppet.

It's also pretty safe to say that you should write your own article on Shuppet.
 
It's pretty safe to say that after the PlusPower ruling that this is a better version of Shuppet.

Seeing as that ruling only exists for Japan's HGSS-on format, it might well be the case that both Shuppet and Beedrill will be rotated out before we get it.
 
This is definetley a different deck than shuppet, and it seems just a little bit better. Wish there was more room. *sigh*
 
2) You must have had tournament success with the deck in question. Before your article is finally accepted, you will need to PM a Cardiologist or Feature Editor with the premier tournament (Cities or higher) at which you used the deck and the place you finished. We expect you to have placed no lower than 8th with your feature article-worthy deck. There is one way around this rule: if you can find someone who has had tourney success with the deck to cowrite with you, or to sponsor your article, you may submit as usual. This is to eliminate the possibility of a deluge of article submissions about untested decks, and to eliminate articles that may not be accurate with regards to matchups.

i thought the Articles had to have Cities or higher results... Guess 3rd place at a BR is good enough lol
 
Not when this deck was put on the front page he didn't.

But it doesn't matter anyway . . . that rule about tournament success hasn't been enforced for ages . . . going back to the Galceon article at least.
 
Not when this deck was put on the front page he didn't.

But it doesn't matter anyway . . . that rule about tournament success hasn't been enforced for ages . . . going back to the Galceon article at least.

I haven't seen the supposedly atrocious article, but I have made finals at a CCs with Glaceon before . . .
 
Back
Top