DonphanAtoZ
New Member
my little bro ripped a beedrill G in half cuz i told him it beat me in reigonals. i really wanted to hit him right there... to the point, well, you beat me so i think it' effective.
St. Louis? Seniors?
my little bro ripped a beedrill G in half cuz i told him it beat me in reigonals. i really wanted to hit him right there... to the point, well, you beat me so i think it' effective.
It's pretty safe to say that after the PlusPower ruling that this is a better version of Shuppet.
IMO you should also add 1 shupped PL for late game re-use of Plus powers
THAT IS WHAT UXIE IS FOR!!!
But I will try to add in a Dunsparce.
This is definetley a different deck than shuppet, and it seems just a little bit better
2) You must have had tournament success with the deck in question. Before your article is finally accepted, you will need to PM a Cardiologist or Feature Editor with the premier tournament (Cities or higher) at which you used the deck and the place you finished. We expect you to have placed no lower than 8th with your feature article-worthy deck. There is one way around this rule: if you can find someone who has had tourney success with the deck to cowrite with you, or to sponsor your article, you may submit as usual. This is to eliminate the possibility of a deluge of article submissions about untested decks, and to eliminate articles that may not be accurate with regards to matchups.
Not when this deck was put on the front page he didn't.
But it doesn't matter anyway . . . that rule about tournament success hasn't been enforced for ages . . . going back to the Galceon article at least.