I completely understand that part of gyarados. But speedrill can hit 90 t2 pretty easily as well. You didn't really sell any argument as to why one was better than the other.
Good point, let me elaborate.
I won 2 BRs already this season playing beedrill. I have always loved beedrill because of the sucsess that it has given me. But you have to look at the facts:
They are both very similar decks, if you think about iT. They are both low energy attackers, fast and extremley resileant. But gyrados has the edge. It does 90 for no energy almost un-conditionaly ( a felcitys or regice will get you those magykarps.) But a beedrill player ( ESPECIALLY a raybees player) usually can't get 3 bees t2. Trust me, I have had a lot of experience with beedrill, especially raybees, and It is very hard to get 3 bees t2 without deminising a significant amount of your late game recorces.
Gyrados is more consistant, more reselient and in this meta game, a better choice.
Lets have a look at the matchups for each deck.
Gengar:
Bedrill 35-65
Gyrados 40-60
This matchup is pretty bad for both decks. Gyra plays a crap load of trainers, but has very few pokemon with powers. Beedrill plays a lot of pokemon with powers ( claydol, 2 flutter wing bees, etc) AND plays a crap load of trainers.
Luxape/blazeray
Gyrados 65-35
Beedrill 35-65
Infernapes/blazikens 0hko bees for 1-2 energy. Gyrados OHKOs blazes and napes for 0 energy. If they show you luxray, scoop up, and drop the crobat for an ohko.
Flygon
Gyrados-45-55
Beedrill- 45-55
A very even matchup, not much to say bout it. They are both stadium relient to a certian extent, and wind erosion descards valuable stuff for both decks.
in conclusion, they are both great decks, but gyrados has the edge in todays meta.
I hope ive made my point:thumb: