I have a question regarding the Compendium ruling on the GE Houndoom.
Q. When using Houndoom's "Black Fire" attack, what happens if I discard an Energy card that provides multiple types of Energy at the same time?
A. If the Energy card you discarded provides all types (for example, Rainbow Energy), then both effects would trigger - the "Black Fire" attack would to 70 damage AND apply the Burned Special Condition to the Defending Pokemon. (DP:Great Encounters FAQ; Feb 21, 2008 PUI Rules Team)
First of all, the attack reads that the attacking player must choose to discard either a fire OR a darkness energy, thus implying that choosing both is not an option.
Second, rainbow energy and cards of that kind (like Multi) specifically state that they provide all types of energy but only ONE kind of energy at a time. At the time of discarding energy from Houndoom, one can't simply say that multi energy provides both darkness and fire energy at the same time. Not only does this violate the terms of the attack, it also violates the statements on the energy itself.
Please justify to me the ruling on GE Houndoom as it stands.
Q. When using Houndoom's "Black Fire" attack, what happens if I discard an Energy card that provides multiple types of Energy at the same time?
A. If the Energy card you discarded provides all types (for example, Rainbow Energy), then both effects would trigger - the "Black Fire" attack would to 70 damage AND apply the Burned Special Condition to the Defending Pokemon. (DP:Great Encounters FAQ; Feb 21, 2008 PUI Rules Team)
First of all, the attack reads that the attacking player must choose to discard either a fire OR a darkness energy, thus implying that choosing both is not an option.
Second, rainbow energy and cards of that kind (like Multi) specifically state that they provide all types of energy but only ONE kind of energy at a time. At the time of discarding energy from Houndoom, one can't simply say that multi energy provides both darkness and fire energy at the same time. Not only does this violate the terms of the attack, it also violates the statements on the energy itself.
Please justify to me the ruling on GE Houndoom as it stands.