Pinsir52
New Member
I've been wondering for a while, but only just now actually decided to post on it.
After worlds, I always buy one of the decks, not only for the cool deck, but for the book that comes in it. It gives the decklists of the top 4 in each age division, and I like to read over and study then. I really do feel that studying how the best of the best's builds (not necessarily playing ) can help my own deck building skillz, and who knows, maybe one day my list will be in one of those books
Anyway, a few of the lists last year had a 3-2 Claydol line. I really don't get it...I'm not saying it's a bad play or anything (top 4 in worlds! Who am I to question the quality of the deck !?), I simply just don't get it.
Obviously, 1 extra Claydol gives it a slightly lower chance of being prized and a higher chance of drawing into it, but then why not a 3-3?
Ugh...I know it's good, just someone please explain to me why. I've been trying to figure it out for like a year now...
After worlds, I always buy one of the decks, not only for the cool deck, but for the book that comes in it. It gives the decklists of the top 4 in each age division, and I like to read over and study then. I really do feel that studying how the best of the best's builds (not necessarily playing ) can help my own deck building skillz, and who knows, maybe one day my list will be in one of those books
Anyway, a few of the lists last year had a 3-2 Claydol line. I really don't get it...I'm not saying it's a bad play or anything (top 4 in worlds! Who am I to question the quality of the deck !?), I simply just don't get it.
Obviously, 1 extra Claydol gives it a slightly lower chance of being prized and a higher chance of drawing into it, but then why not a 3-3?
Ugh...I know it's good, just someone please explain to me why. I've been trying to figure it out for like a year now...