My first post in this thread was to show that many so called experts on the 'gym are not experts at all. I saw people make entire "SP guides" that didn't mention dialga or palkia as main attackers, or as the real threats from PT.
It wasn't to brag about having a winning list. The list does no good, you can get a pretty decent one by just trolling the 'gym now. As for that one kid's deck, I suggested he go down to 1/1 because it obviously wasn't the main attacker in the deck. A 2/2 dialga line? So that they won't be prized or something? 1/1 is fine- prizing a component only 20% of the time, when you won't need it for the majority of matches. His strategy had 4 weavile, 4 toxicroak- a dialga isn't going to help set anything up and would detract from his setup. I look at the deck in front of me, and try to make it the best IT can be. Not what I want. I have had Dialga G built since last year, literally. I could have told him all the cards to drop to make his list look like mine, but that wouldn't have helped HIS deck. HIS deck was weaviles and toxicroak, with a tech dialga to (I assume) get rid of bodies and the like). He had no darkness energy for his weaviles, no draw powers, and only 3 gyms. Let's face it- if Dialga G X is used as a tech pokemon, then you need a 1/1 line. If he's an attacker, it's a 3/1 line. His deck was based on, from what I saw, using croak and weavile, not dialga, so I tried to help his deck accordingly. I doooo think it's cute that you took the time out of your day to search for posts I made in the deck help section. I'm glad I'm so important :thumb:
I'm not even quite sure what this deck is trying to talk about. Is it referring to A palkia/dialga deck, or palkia decks, or dialga decks, or both or all? I'm very proud of my deck. I worked very very very very very hard for months and months. Out of 7 people who ran my list, 6 made the top cut, and it brought home FIVE trophies. 5/7. 2 firsts, 2 seconds, and a third.
I know that what has been posted so far is only indicative of one variant- palkia/dialga together. This was not the only galactic deck with success. My two galactic decks are different, but I can't reveal their contents, as we have another state and regional left.
Whenever somebody feels so superior that they must publicly gloat, but cannot willingly help another person...
Seriously, you have no idea who I am. You don't know if I've helped people with this deck or not. I didn't post to gloat, just to say that I would take anything I see here with a grain of salt. Remember, the so-called experts posting in this thread are the same types of people who expertly decided that dialga was a tech pokemon, etc. That was the point of my post, and I tried to back it up by saying that I have had real, evidential success with the deck, and I know for a fact that this thread is only partially correct. I can't correct it myself because, well, I am invested in the deck and can't reveal the contents of any of my decks in any way. I hope you guys understand why, as when you work countless hours to make a deck, you don't want to just give it away to bloodsuckers doing no work, and when I still have tournaments to attend.
I think I make it more than obvious that I help people. I post deck articles, am the only moderator for the deck forum (although, luckily, people like P_A and other mods come in to help moderate), and do genuinely offer good, solid advice to people. Could I do more? Yes. But it would be a hindrance to my own success, so I won't. If that makes me greedy, so be it.