While I KINDA agree with Pokey, here's what I think.
I used to play in a tournament that was 15 minutes from my house EVERY week. Then I got a job, and that location closed down. I hardly played in anything other than major tourneys, as League just wasn't an availability because of work, and York was like an hour away. Currently, I only play in larger scale tourneys, because I am far too busy for League anymore. I think that looking at someone's ranking for the appearance of their "skill" is not a very good indicator. I think that one should look at the concentration of talent in a particular state or area that someone is in.
Face it, some players beat the snot out of less-talented players, and get huge rankings. And some really great players can only go to a few events because of location, time, or other varibles.
It is unfortunate though, that only the players that can frequent tournaments more than others have a better chance at earning invites through T16 Ranking. However, if you look another way at if you are "skilled but unable to attend" many events, just win or EARN an invite or other assorted prizes.
This topic is becoming mixed up with the ideal of "What Does It Mean to be a Good Trainer/Player?" POP Rankings, may show how you stack against players that CAN GET TO TOURNAMENTS. Call it personal preference, but being #1 Global in that kind of system doesn't come close to becoming a World Champion amongst your peers in hard and hell fought tournaments. THAT's what competition is all about.
(Note: I do fit into both catagories. I only play in major tourneys, so my tournament attendence is lower compared to most others, but I am currently 35th Global overall, and 15th Global 15+)
~Jim