drmario
New Member
And the people who say its fake do?
Do you beleive the moon landing was faked?
- Thread starter Absoltrainer
- Start date
- Status
DarthPika
New Member
Please before you post something like this, be more like absol trainer and ACTUALLY GET THE CORRECT DATA to support your post.
You seem to have NO idea about how anything in space works. This is where these stupid arguments about weather it was faked or not start, with people who don't really know what there talking about and say it should work how THEY THINK it should work.
Oh really? Mind explaining how what I said doesn't make sence? lol please.
I have an idea none of us know about space, van allen belts, or nothing even if we listen to Nasa preach, Nasa lies time and time again, Richard Hoagland who worked there will tell you that.
DarthPika
New Member
yoyofsho16
New Member
Yeah, I gotta go with drmario on this one. The Mythbusters are professionals at this, you are just someone on the internet.
I am 100% certain that if it were fake, then someone SOMEWHERE involved in the space program would have told the presses by now, 40 years later.
Yeah, I gotta go with drmario on this one. The Mythbusters are professionals at this, you are just someone on the internet.
I am 100% certain that if it were fake, then someone SOMEWHERE involved in the space program would have told the presses by now, 40 years later.
Press wont report it
reason;
so many levels operate Nasa, basically maybe 1-2 levels of Nasa will know if its fake or not, theirs also a trend Hoagland noticed to, people working at Nasa tend to get family members years later to continue what their mothers or fathers did all to keep everything a secret.
And the magic bullet theory was authorized by the US gov't in the Warren Commission Report and that is pure and utter hogwash. A bullet fired from a rifle doesnt make left and right turns to strike that many people and come out unscathed......yeah.....right.
Look, we may or may not have landed on the moon. In the long run, NASA has made their billions for their contractors and themselves.
Keith
Look, we may or may not have landed on the moon. In the long run, NASA has made their billions for their contractors and themselves.
Keith
Sandslash7
<a href="http://pokegym.net/forums/showpost.php?p=
I don't remember bringing NASA into my post...
Sorry I wasn't clear. Wilmont N. Hess was the one who studied the Van Allen Belts. He was a Director of the NOAA.
Sorry I wasn't clear. Wilmont N. Hess was the one who studied the Van Allen Belts. He was a Director of the NOAA.
Absoltrainer
Active Member
I see my large post that DESCRIBED EVERY PART people were saying made it fake and proved them true has been more or less ignored =/
Because they keep getting killed off? lol Who knows why the gov't won't let this one out of the bag now, but people can't come forward because they get erased before they can.Yeah, I gotta go with drmario on this one. The Mythbusters are professionals at this, you are just someone on the internet.
I am 100% certain that if it were fake, then someone SOMEWHERE involved in the space program would have told the presses by now, 40 years later.
On an interesting side note, I watched Apollo 13 (again) last night. Still an amazing movie and story.
Absoltrainer: I dont think people are ignoring your post, but you basically cited 2 different sources. Plus, you weren't even alive when this happened (I was, but not by much :lol. Just because someone has written something down or documented it doesn't make it "gospel". In fact, the Bible cannot be viewed as the absolute 100% accurate either because there are discrepencies within the Good Book too!
Bottom line is this, if you had doubts before, then you post will not change anything. If you believed before, it wont be validated either. You may be 100 % correct with your research. Even you would have to admit that IF the photos were not "fixed" or "faked", that they COULD have been, right? You dont deny the fact that the gov't COULD have faked this.....you just choose to believe that it did happen. Again, no one is saying you are wrong or right, I'm just saying to be saying. I dont know what the truth is either....I wasn't there on the moon to see the landing :wink:
(one a side note....you said the camera to film Armstrong was on a tripod....who put the tripod there??? I dont recall robotic arms on the outside of the LM capable of setting the camera out.)
Keith
Absoltrainer: I dont think people are ignoring your post, but you basically cited 2 different sources. Plus, you weren't even alive when this happened (I was, but not by much :lol
. Just because someone has written something down or documented it doesn't make it "gospel". In fact, the Bible cannot be viewed as the absolute 100% accurate either because there are discrepencies within the Good Book too! Bottom line is this, if you had doubts before, then you post will not change anything. If you believed before, it wont be validated either. You may be 100 % correct with your research. Even you would have to admit that IF the photos were not "fixed" or "faked", that they COULD have been, right? You dont deny the fact that the gov't COULD have faked this.....you just choose to believe that it did happen. Again, no one is saying you are wrong or right, I'm just saying to be saying. I dont know what the truth is either....I wasn't there on the moon to see the landing :wink:
(one a side note....you said the camera to film Armstrong was on a tripod....who put the tripod there??? I dont recall robotic arms on the outside of the LM capable of setting the camera out.)
Keith
Ardoptres
New Member
So if i had worked at NASA and said that everything they say is true, that would make it true?
A Thing Of Immense Beauty
New Member
I do believe the original moon landing was faked.
no, lies differ at every level.
someone might believe something thats a lie, the person they got it from may of believed it from the person they got the information from.
Ardoptres
New Member
So actually, you just believe what you want to believe.
Last edited:
Poke Trainer J
New Member
Yeah, I gotta go with drmario on this one. The Mythbusters are professionals at this, you are just someone on the internet.
I am 100% certain that if it were fake, then someone SOMEWHERE involved in the space program would have told the presses by now, 40 years later.
The Mythbusters proved that the first lunar landing wasn't fake, I saw the whole thing. It's confirmed!
The one thing that gets me every time people talk about this subject is that every time I see people giving "evidence" that the moon landing was faked, they completely skip one majour topic - moon rocks!
The moon rocks retrieved even from the first moon landing have things like micro-meteorite impact damage that, given 1960s or even 1980s technology, would be 100% impossible to fake.
But the hoaxists don't have any way to counter that one so they just don't even bring it up, of course!
The moon rocks retrieved even from the first moon landing have things like micro-meteorite impact damage that, given 1960s or even 1980s technology, would be 100% impossible to fake.
But the hoaxists don't have any way to counter that one so they just don't even bring it up, of course!
Corret me if I'm wrong, but the eath gets hits by thousands of metors a year, right? They could've easily had gathered up rocks here on earth. Also, who performed these studies? (serious question) The govn't could've just payed someone off.
Ah, but the problem is the size of the impacts. Any meteorite 1-2cm in diameter is not going to connect with a darn thing on Earth's surface!
edit: and some of the rocks have multiple impact points, which further compounds the impossibility of them being fake.
- Status