ex: Ruby & Sapphire Blaziken Print Error?

[Gibby]

Hello all. My name is Gibby, and I guess you could say this is my first post on these forums. I've been a member of pokeschool.com for a while now, but when I asked this question, we were unsure as to what to think or say, so with the help of Bullados, a frequent poster, we thought it would be beneficial to post this here and see what you all thought.

I was at my local Wal-Mart the other day, looking in the Trading Card Game section, like I tend to do every time I go to Wal-Mart. While I was there, I got the few things that I went in to get, and I decided to pick up a few packs since I had some money left over.

I picked up a couple of the ex: Ruby & Sapphire packs for I am still a little behind in those cards, and they happen to have them.

When I got back to my house and I opened the packs, I found this peculiar card. It is Blaziken. The card itself isn’t what’s peculiar, for it has all the information that it should.

Now, in the ex: Ruby & Sapphire set, there are two Blaziken cards; a holographic (card number 3 / 109) and a rare (card number 15 / 109). What I found that is strange is that this Blaziken is the holographic (card number 3 / 109) but it isn’t holographic. The number on the bottom right says 3 / 109. It was also noticed that the "e" that is seen on all the cards on the bottom left corner wasnot there either, so I was wondering if this was an error card.

With the help of Bullados, we have found that there was one known ex: Ruby & Sapphire Blaziken card (card number 3 / 109) that was printed that wasn't a holographic and didn't contain the "e" on the bottom left corner. It was found in the ex: Master Trainer kit box sets (a link to such a box set can be found here), but I never purchased for myself that box set. I have gotten myself the four 2004 and four 2005 World Championship Deck boxes and the two ex: Trainer Kit boxes, but that is about all in the box set deal.

So, my question is, is there a known ex: Ruby & Sapphire Blaziken error known or am do I have some wrong information?

((Sorry that there is so much text here. I tend to like to give a great deal of information in my posts. *blush*))

[ PS ]
Sorry if this was posted into the wrong section. It was either here or in the [Single Cards: Strategy, Rulings, & Collecting Questions] section, and I wasn't sure if it should have been there for it wasn't a strategy, ruling, or collection question (well, it could be considered a collection question, but I'm unsure).

 

[TheDarkTwins]

Hello all. My name is Gibby, and I guess you could say this is my first post on these forums. I've been a member of pokeschool.com for a while now, but when I asked this question, we were unsure as to what to think or say, so with the help of Bullados, a frequent poster, we thought it would be beneficial to post this here and see what you all thought.

I was at my local Wal-Mart the other day, looking in the Trading Card Game section, like I tend to do every time I go to Wal-Mart. While I was there, I got the few things that I went in to get, and I decided to pick up a few packs since I had some money left over.

I picked up a couple of the ex: Ruby & Sapphire packs for I am still a little behind in those cards, and they happen to have them.

When I got back to my house and I opened the packs, I found this peculiar card. It is Blaziken. The card itself isn’t what’s peculiar, for it has all the information that it should.

Now, in the ex: Ruby & Sapphire set, there are two Blaziken cards; a holographic (card number 3 / 109) and a rare (card number 15 / 109). What I found that is strange is that this Blaziken is the holographic (card number 3 / 109) but it isn’t holographic. The number on the bottom right says 3 / 109. It was also noticed that the "e" that is seen on all the cards on the bottom left corner wasnot there either, so I was wondering if this was an error card.

With the help of Bullados, we have found that there was one known ex: Ruby & Sapphire Blaziken card (card number 3 / 109) that was printed that wasn't a holographic and didn't contain the "e" on the bottom left corner. It was found in the ex: Master Trainer kit box sets (a link to such a box set can be found here), but I never purchased for myself that box set. I have gotten myself the four 2004 and four 2005 World Championship Deck boxes and the two ex: Trainer Kit boxes, but that is about all in the box set deal.

So, my question is, is there a known ex: Ruby & Sapphire Blaziken error known or am do I have some wrong information?

((Sorry that there is so much text here. I tend to like to give a great deal of information in my posts. *blush*))

[ PS ]
Sorry if this was posted into the wrong section. It was either here or in the [Single Cards: Strategy, Rulings, & Collecting Questions] section, and I wasn't sure if it should have been there for it wasn't a strategy, ruling, or collection question (well, it could be considered a collection question, but I'm unsure).

I believe this card is contained in the Ex: Battle Stadium Set... It also includes a Gardy that is exactly the same...
I dont believe it is an error...
Drew

 

[Gibby]

I believe this card is contained in the Ex: Battle Stadium Set... It also includes a Gardy that is exactly the same.

Alright TheDarkTwins, or Drew.

I did a quick google image search for ex: Battle Stadium Set, and based on the images I found, I never purchased such a “set.” Plus i don't contain a Gardevoir from the ex: Ruby & Sapphire set (holographic or none).

Oh well. In some fashion, I somehow obtained this card.

So would it still count as being part of the ex: Ruby & Sapphire set or would it be best to set it aside and find one that was actually from the set itself?

Being the kind of person I am, I will most likely set it asside and try to find one that is actually from the set itself. That would make me feel greatly better about it for some reason.