GuardianTIM said:
Psycho Lugia X, you do realize that you're going to have to explain those clues to us when we either guess it, or go through all of the pokemon, right?
And no, this is not so fun for some of us anymore. We've had some guesses that exactly fitted the clues (the Pikaguess, for example), but that's not it apparently, and you're not willing to elaborate on those first 3 clues. Frankly, I'm getting rather bored of this...
OOOOH!!! That stung. Honestly.
Ok, as u MAY remember, on one of my earlier posts, i said i
would elaborate on the clues
UPON THE REQUEST OF THE PEOPLE!
I will consider this a request. So! Here we go:
1. No valedictorian: Name
2. Cristina Ricci's fake gold : Appearence
3. Like yo-yos, pogs, and nano pets: Episode
Got it? And im sure
someone out there is still havin' fun. Like me for one, but i dont count! ^_^
And also, after this, i am willing to bet: within 15 posts, this will get solved since i gave out the relevences to the clues. Watch.
Oh yeah, i must refute that theory about 100% correct guesses in the past. The most ROCK SOLID anyone has gotten were 2/3, even that Pikaguesser, Pika didnt share THE relationship with the pog/yo/pet clue. What he rationalized was not 100% accurate, therefore, he pika cant be a 100%, LEGIT answer. I retain this ambiguity of what he said to encourage u all to revisit it and maybe stumble upon inspiration.
I mean, if 10 people
really give up, then state so and i will be a new record holder: I will have beaten you!