My guess is that the colour is either a light, icy blue or a vibrant orange.
WOW! this is incredible news!
As for the weakness of the dragons, I think it would be fair to say the weakness is Dragon itself! who agrees?
Will it just be Special Energy?
Have to wait for someone else to reveal that. *sigh*
Dragon attacks are usually 100 percent accurate, but in the TCG they all have on thing in common. You must flip two coins and if either/both of them are tails the attack fails.
So you are confirming that there will be Special energy, but unless someone claims to reveal the fact that there is basic energy also, you won't confirm?!?
Hey, we're all just guessing the color for fun. No real reason other than to scratch at our brains what it will be.Why is everyone debating color? Dragons have always been colorless unless they've been dual-typed (Such as Reshiram and Zekrom).
To me, Dragon Type is just a new symbol. The only time color is ever even mentioned/considered are in Double Colorless Energy or in Rainbow Energy (And it's various versions, and only as flavor). There is no "Search for a green Pokemon", it's "Search for a :grass: pokemon"; not "Weakness REDx2", but rather "Weakness :fire:x2". This isn't Magic The Gathering :nonono:
A pokemon's type is determined by the symbol in the corner of the card, not the color of it's border. That part could be Pink or Brown for all I care.
Dragon attacks are usually 100 percent accurate, but in the TCG they all have on thing in common. You must flip two coins and if either/both of them are tails the attack fails.
This is how they will nerf the dragon attacks.
So I must have imagined Dragonite ex (delta)'s Dragon Roar, or Salamence SW's Dragon Finish, as well as Garchomp C's Dragon Claw and Dragon Rush attacks, and most recent Outrage for the three mascots of BW. Two of which are VG attacks the others made for TCG. In all seriousness I doubt that the cards would be nerfed due to attacks, but probably for some other requirement, such as a special energy cost or even the mixed energy cost that dragons have had, but with less awesome attacks.
I'm still unsure about the whole split. Sure it's going to breath some new life into the game, but they just reintroduced EXs, an effect that hasn't been fully seen yet. However, I'm still intrigued to see what they do with it. All I hope is that it won't break the game, which is unlikely if it's supposed to be a mainstay of the game.
Further I wonder if this is a prelude to something like the Trainer re-branding in Japan's HS was to the sub-classifications.
Those are great examples Dragon attacks, but look at it this way..
The three dragon type attacks with dragon in their name are Dragon Rage, Dragon Steam, and Dragon Stamp:
[2] Dragon Rage (50) Flip 2 coins. If either of them is tails, this attack does nothing.
[4] Dragon Stamp (80) Flip 2 coins. If both of them are tails, this attack does nothing. If both of them are heads, the Defending Pokemon is now Paralyzed.
[W] Dragon Steam (60) If your opponent has any R Pokemon in play, this attack's base damage is 20 instead of 60.
Which one stands out? The one that doesn't fail when you get tails.
Then there is "Twister" which isn't being used by any dragon pokemons, but is technically a dragon type attacks. This is TM Pidge
[3] Twister (30) Flip 2 coins. If both of them are tails, this attack does nothing. For each heads, discard an Energy attached to the Defending Pokemon.
Including Outrage, 3/5 of the currently modified Dragon Type attacks fail under tails.
Plus if they want to push Dragon types, they may make brand new attacks like in the case of Dragon Roar, and feature new powerful attacks like they've done in the past. That's also the reason why the TCG is so different from the VG, they can make new attacks to balance the meta.