vaporeon
Moderator
I know that but it does not make them fair. While the rulebook says there are more then one way to win but the truth of it is once time is call, the remaining prizes are the only way to decide a winner. The game does not check to see if there are any cards remaining in the deck, or if your playing Durant or other mill decks or in between turn effect because it does not make it that far. The winner of that game should be given the win if they lead by prize cards once time is called.
We cant do anything about it but giving a player a win if the won game 1 and to just throw out game 2 is bad for the game. I can play with bad rules but this is almost unplayable competitively. Winning the first game is so important now. The player that won game 1 has no real reason to play faster then he needs of if someone is winning game 1 and keeps the lead, they can legally slow play that game and make sure game 2 never finishes.
We cant do anything about it but giving a player a win if the won game 1 and to just throw out game 2 is bad for the game. I can play with bad rules but this is almost unplayable competitively. Winning the first game is so important now. The player that won game 1 has no real reason to play faster then he needs of if someone is winning game 1 and keeps the lead, they can legally slow play that game and make sure game 2 never finishes.