Discussion in 'Deck Help and Strategy' started by The Captain, Aug 22, 2007.

8 league13 468 60
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. The Captain

    The Captain New Member

    3-2-3 T-tar D ex
    4 pikachu DP2
    4 Raichu DP 2

    3 mentor
    3 petm/bebe
    3 Stevens
    2 copycat
    1 Prof. Rowan
    1 TG's Wager
    3 candy
    4 Crystal Beach
    2 night maitenence
    3 Scott
    2 Warp Point
    1 Mr. Stone Project

    13 Electric energy
    3 Cyclone

    Me and Batmandillan's own original creation it's called T-T-T TeeeCHUUUUUU yea like the name i came up with? LOLZ

    All right here's the strategy start with pika , evlolve toe rai then get energys on your ex. The begin the T-tar attack use cyclones and warp to stall a turn then OHKO with t-tar. LMK what you think
    Last edited: Aug 23, 2007
  2. batmandillan

    batmandillan New Member

    dude our deck is tight we thought this all up
    i love TEEECHHHU
  3. Rai

    Rai <a href="http://pokegym.net/forums/showpost.php?p=

    Have you looked at Bebe's search? Sure, it puts a card back into the deck, but it can search for ANY pokemon (including Ttar EX d). So substituting a couple to replace something more restrictive like a PETM might be useful.

    I also am wondering how much better the deck would do with a few more Rare Candies. 'Might be mistaken, but it seems like an immediate Raichu is a must here. Same with Ttar EX d.

    The amount of Scotts and Steven's Advices looks a tad overkill to me, but that might just be my lame deckbuilding for ya. Still, I don't ever recall needing 4 Scotts... Ever.
  4. The Captain

    The Captain New Member

    yea i was thinking about bebe it was a hard choice i'll try both way and i think -one scott for a candy is a good idea i'll do that ,but i personally am in love with stevens it really works well
  5. feraligatr222

    feraligatr222 New Member

    Dosn't celio have an errata so you can search for ex's? If so, use celio.
  6. KingGengar

    KingGengar New Member

    I like the deck but...
    (1) why pikachu d?
    (2) why so many scott?
    (3) no ssu?
    (4) change petm for bebe
    (5) change mr stone for energy recycle system
  7. batmandillan

    batmandillan New Member

    1. forgot to change them since the first build used castform whats the best pika
    2. Personal choice it's going down to 3
    3. Umm thought about it and decided to go against flippy cards
    4. I'll try it
    5. bad early game which is important esspecially if you don't manaage T2 raichu .

    overall helpful post thanks for the contribution

    Back to back posts merged. The following information has been added:

    Last edited: Aug 23, 2007
  8. KingGengar

    KingGengar New Member

    best pika is the new one since it doesn't have true weakness. don't use pichu.

    glad to help


    4 scott is an overkill
    3 scott is still an over kill

    max u should do is 2 but typically one.
  10. lolganium

    lolganium New Member

    2 scott

    btw; post above me, love the sig quote
  11. B_B_C

    B_B_C New Member

    pikachu (PK) Is ok.
  12. Let Fire Fall

    Let Fire Fall New Member

    - 1 Copy Cat
    + 1 Team Galactics Wager

    Your deck disrupts alot, Wager adds more.

    - 2 Stevens
    + 2 TVR

    TVR is just better IMO, but I still left 1 Stevens

    - 2 Scott
    - 1 Stones Project
    - 1 Night Maintenence
    + 2 Castaway
    + 2 Cessation Crystal

    Raichu + Cessation Crystal can slow your opponent alot in the beggining. Plus, Castaway is just better IMO than Scott. Scott should never be used in more than 1 max 2.

    also, a 4th rare candy would be good
  13. pyrot53

    pyrot53 New Member

    here is how I made it and now the mod is gonna get mad at me for saying its mine again but w/e
    3-2-3T-tar D ex
    2-2 fearow D
    3 pikachu D HP
    3 Raichu DP 2
    4 castform

    3 mentor
    3 petm
    3 TV reporter (or adventure if i can find any)
    3 candy
    3 windstorm
    2 pluspower
    2 night maitenence

    10 Electri energy
    4 delta rainbow
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page