Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

TheDarkTwins LONG 28th Place Worlds Report w/ Garchomp From 0-2 to 5-2! WITH LIST! :D

It's better? If one of my basic's get KO'd I still have a full line. Plus it is a much better starter than most of the other Pokemon in my deck. I'd rather start with a Gible than say Uxie or Baltoy.

I wasn't questioning the 4th gible, i was more wondering why only 3 garchomp instead of 4, especially when you alraedy run 4 gible.
 
I tried, but my list was baaaad! :frown: Just out of interest why warp?


(Any news on your theme deck you said we might trade? I have some new stuff you may want to check out on my thread?)

It takes a lot of work to get a deck to where you want. I asked a lot of my friends for their advice on it, they helped a lot. They gave me suggestions that I wouldn't have normal gone with even if I wasn't sold on them at the start. I mean I didn't want Call in the deck, however Jay suggest it and while I was skeptical I put it in, and it helped more that I was expecting.

I wasn't questioning the 4th gible, i was more wondering why only 3 garchomp instead of 4, especially when you alraedy run 4 gible.

There really wasn't needed. If they were able to KO 3 Garchomp I was in trouble. I first off didn't have room and the second thing was there were more important cards that I needed first. I would have loved to have a 4th Garchomp, but overall the deck ran perfectly fine without it and I never really had an issue with it. So all of those it was a personal choice. I have done it before with other decks. I have played (when Ex were legal) a 4-2-3-2 line with 5 of the big evolution. It just how the deck feels and works, and how it much room it has and if anything is better instead of it.

Drew
 
Back
Top