...who got 3rd/4th?
Sorry, I just thought it was a very disrespectful thing to say about the deck and the player that made the final.
Been told to calm down by a mod, so I don't really want to get into an off-topic argument with you, but I will just point out that 'fun' is a matter of opinion, and you utterly failed to explain HOW some decks take take more skill than Luxchomp.
Ian W of Washington lost in T16. - Jrs. Congradulations Ian, you really did awesome. You everyone at Phoenix Games Gym is very proud of you. I am sure you be very successful at Worlds this year as well.
Yeah what decks won Nationals? If sablelock won, I will pass out and wake up hopefully in a world without this game...
From my experience sampling it, it's not fun to play at all. It easily beats other decks even when I make obvious mistakes. A netdecked Luxchomp can likely beat many experienced players. As for getting "owned" by Luxchomp, I do usually lose to Luxchomp seeing as I play Kingdra. But in my experiences where I'm not donked, I have beaten Luxchomp. I think there are decks that are harder to play well and actually demand practice, and I would have liked to have seen those win. And Luxchomp players being all better than me is ridiculous, since victory with Luxchomp tends to be because of the deck rather than the player. Of course there are exceptions and people who practice and tweak Luxchomp constantly. I am just experssing my views that from my experience, other decks are funner to play and play against as well as demand more skill, and I would've rather have seen something like that win. If you disagree, so be it.
I don't think we saw one?
Just heard attendence numbers from sources over at Facebook and twitter.
826 masters
300 seniors
210 juniors
1336 total
0n3 5h0r7 0f 1337, d4n9. :[ (one short of 1337, dang)
Sorry for not bringing that up. Netdeck my Kingdra list and you'll likely lose miserably. By "fun" I meant when I have asked Luxchomp players if they enjoy playing the deck they have said no, and no one I have ever talked to enjoys playing Luxchomp whether they win or lose.
Since when does Luxchomp require skill?
From my experience sampling it, it's not fun to play at all. It easily beats other decks even when I make obvious mistakes. A netdecked Luxchomp can likely beat many experienced players. As for getting "owned" by Luxchomp, I do usually lose to Luxchomp seeing as I play Kingdra. But in my experiences where I'm not donked, I have beaten Luxchomp. I think there are decks that are harder to play well and actually demand practice, and I would have liked to have seen those win. And Luxchomp players being all better than me is ridiculous, since victory with Luxchomp tends to be because of the deck rather than the player. Of course there are exceptions and people who practice and tweak Luxchomp constantly. I am just experssing my views that from my experience, other decks are funner to play and play against as well as demand more skill, and I would've rather have seen something like that win. If you disagree, so be it.