Sandslash7
<a href="http://pokegym.net/forums/showpost.php?p=
I sincerely doubt his role had anything to do with that. Probably a Red Herring to annoy.
Interesting theory, Ikrit. That was something I didn't catch the first time I read the Day post.
Now we must deal with the fact of 2 Vigilantes out there.
Another thing: Why has discussion stopped? We should be going over the evidence and finding wolves.
The Jason/Brawler conundrum is still annoying me. I'm leaning towards just dropping one of them, so that we can: 1. End the Day (so other things happen) and 2. Get rid of a Bandwagoner. Right now, I feel Jason's 'role claim' is suspicious. If someone were the seer, they should get people to vote for prospective wolves through logic, rather than: "I have a strong hunch they are wolves... etc."
Interesting theory, Ikrit. That was something I didn't catch the first time I read the Day post.
Now we must deal with the fact of 2 Vigilantes out there.
Another thing: Why has discussion stopped? We should be going over the evidence and finding wolves.
The Jason/Brawler conundrum is still annoying me. I'm leaning towards just dropping one of them, so that we can: 1. End the Day (so other things happen) and 2. Get rid of a Bandwagoner. Right now, I feel Jason's 'role claim' is suspicious. If someone were the seer, they should get people to vote for prospective wolves through logic, rather than: "I have a strong hunch they are wolves... etc."