OK, these posts are being made I go through the day from the beginning of Page 7. Also, I am slightly disappointed that more discussion did not go on while I was gone. More on this in the next response:
Day 2 opening post: Gash? Huh? Confused by Wolves tactics...in agreement with the rest of the town's confusion here.
z-man: OK, two things for you-
1) I <3 YOUR ROLE SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO MUCH!!!!!
2) If you ever quote The Sound of Music or Oklahoma, I swear to God I will flip this town on you and watch you die a slow, horrible, painful, and awe inducing death. kthnxbye!
(so that people don't rear their ugly heads over that post, I am a musical theatre afficianado and have a particular loathing for the aforementioned musicals. Don't judge me; judge the music fail in those shows.)
rokman: why are you "lol"ing at dead townies? (Post 155) Also, low blow against DarthPika in Post 160.
DarthPika: I had a strong storyline and some day posts even prepared a month before WW X even started. Everyone has their own storytelling style. Adjust and get over it. kthnxbye!
As for the rest of your post, Lakak being protected is kinda...interesting. Everyone is more or less in agreement at present over his townie-ness and I don't see a reason to protect him at night...unless that's already part of his role. This could be significant later. As for the kitchen ref., I won't read to much into it...yet.
Rei: Excellent observation! I even went back and reread the Opening Post of the day based on your answer. Those two WERE targetted by both wolves and somehow Lakak was protected. Good eyes!
Here's the bigger question though: do the wolves have a double kill ability or is it limited to just one Wolf acting a bit rogue-ish? There's no real way to know until we examine what happens tomorrow night. If the pattern follows, then the wolves have some ability that lets them kill two at a time. And ladies and gentlemen, that is frakin' scary and we then need to find a wolf, and fast.
On another note: the FEED ME in 131 is for Little Shop of Horrors as mentioned before (Feed Me, Seymore is the actual name of the song, 141 is in the Reasoning thing and could be any stereotypical 40s tap musical, and in 91 he did not vote. It could be he has to post a musical clip every time he votes. If not, he may have received a private warning for this first offense and we just don't know it yet (if it were my game, that would be the first penalty and then a public warning would come next followed by a modkill).
PokeChamp: Check WW IX where I called for Priest protection for the first few days at the detriment of my own role. why did I do this? I was one of the only players driving the conversation (and even ended up killing a couple Wolves before I had to let the guard of the Priest down). In this topic, there are more than just me and 2 or 3 others as experienced players and ever some of the n00bs (no offense meant by the term) are offering excellent insight (Rai, I'm looking at you). Because of that, I will probably not be calling for Priest protection tonight. I'll decide that at the end of the post.
As for the meat of your post, I just confirmed that z-man has made only ONE slip up. And this is penalized by private warning, not public. It's not him. Nice try, though.
z-man: no...your role is a a lie and it makes me sad. What's more, I'm already playing another Mafia game right now and can't join another, even one as amazing as something based on Broadway. Sad face...
Brawler: thanks for the support on the Priest protection. Also, it seems as though everyone's conversation is painting a bigger target on CERTAIN PLAYERS HEADS by everyone saying "Why didn't the Wolves kill one of the experienced players? That's such a bad play..."
I'm alive.
I'm happy for this.
Drop the conversation as I ENJOY being alive.
As for your vote...
rokman: WHY the random vote @ Rai? S/he's (srry, not sure which) been one of the more intelligent posters in my absence and you just go out and vote for no reason at all and have to be PROMPTED for reasoning? And your reasoning...wow. "There's so much drama, woe is me.". seriously, your post there is causing more drama than anything else in this topic. Good work. Also, calling someone a nerd is not an insult. We're all Poke-Nerds here, so there
Nerds - 1, Nerdfighters - >1, Others - 0
Also, leaving accusations hanging like you did with no support is a surefire way to get yourself lynched. DarthPika has been posting well (though not as well as in past games) and yet you feel the need to call him out on calling others out. So confused by this...
Now, onto my vote. To help me, I will quote another experienced (and excellent) player.
[
Vote: Undecided
I do not find in any way anything that points to rokman as a wolf, apart from as bit of a condescending attitude and some bad logic. I do not believe that he is a wolf. No one who is a wolf would come out and so clearly say things that would put the attention on themselves. He is merely a bit of an overreactive townie.
I agree to an extent with Ikrit's well-reasoned vote. Rokman is being a VERY aggressive townie. Overly so and angry about it IMO too. This si drawing a LOT of attention to him. He's said a LOT of detrimental things about strong (and not-so-strong) town players that really wants me to lynch him. But are his motivations exactly Wolfy. I don't think so.
Now, this doesn't mean I won't vote for him. There are two kinds of players I vote off in Werewolf games:
1) Werewolves
2) Stupid players
rokman, right now you are SOLIDLY in the latter of the two and possibly could slip into the top of the two. You're on the edge of Wolfy and could swing there very easily.
However, I must go with ikrit here and agree that you're not as Wolfy as I would vote for yet. You're save for about 24 hours before i send a vote headed at your head.
VOTE: Undecided
Angry Pointy Finger: rokman (you have 24 hours to defend yourself before you are lynched by me
