Ha, as if. Making mincemeat out of an awful draw tests your consistency. If this were true, the people who go to Worlds each year would be completely random.
Maybe I need to clarify. Yes those people that go to worlds every year are good but there is still luck nonetheless. When you pair up 2 people that are at the same skill level against each other, the luckier one usually wins. Skill is still a factor and that is why starter decks don't go to worlds. Idk...the game itself has luck factor in it.
There's a lotttttt of above average players. Like, 400 maybe in the US.
Try 100 maybe.
Of course, that isn't true, that Worlds is random. It isn't all luck based, otherwise, people like David Atanassov, Silvestro, and Gino (up until this year) wouldn't be getting invites every year without even getting top 4 at Worlds. It is skill, and the "pro" (i prefer the term "really good," considering nobody makes a living off of Pokemon winnings) players all qualify consistently every year from rating or top cut at nats. It isn't luck, or else these players wouldn't be consistently doing well.