yoyofsho16
New Member
I REVISED THIS ARTICLE.
I believe that Garchomp lv. x is bad. Just bad.
Most people building the deck are talking about loads of bad things. The fact is, in order to let this deck run, the way i see fit is to just throw in some random good pokemon to revive. The problem is, that really veers from the gameplay. I don't understand how you could run his deck when you have to go away from alot of starters and things that let you get the card out, and fill that with random cards you will draw and not get when you need them.
I think that people don't even realize how hard the card is to get out. At all. When you have a random Blastoise d just waiting to get discarded and revived, and you draw it when having difficulties, that isn't really the best at all. A stage 2 level x is already hard enough to get out and mighty slow, so how do you expect to get it out?
Personally, I think there are/will be (next year) a lot of far better decks in the format. Garchomp isn't worth playing in my opinion.
I believe that Garchomp lv. x is bad. Just bad.
Most people building the deck are talking about loads of bad things. The fact is, in order to let this deck run, the way i see fit is to just throw in some random good pokemon to revive. The problem is, that really veers from the gameplay. I don't understand how you could run his deck when you have to go away from alot of starters and things that let you get the card out, and fill that with random cards you will draw and not get when you need them.
I think that people don't even realize how hard the card is to get out. At all. When you have a random Blastoise d just waiting to get discarded and revived, and you draw it when having difficulties, that isn't really the best at all. A stage 2 level x is already hard enough to get out and mighty slow, so how do you expect to get it out?
Personally, I think there are/will be (next year) a lot of far better decks in the format. Garchomp isn't worth playing in my opinion.
Last edited: