Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

Disturbing Picture

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sorry, I missed it. I'll gladly answer it now.

One of my acts will be the "Conscience Act". It will inform meat - eaters of the murder they are being involved in. This will make it easier for them when I pass the "Vegetarian Act". Three guesses to what that means. Next, I'll have the "Debuilding Act" to stop all major construction. The "Population Act" will stop the destruction of the planet.

For the rebuilding, I propose soaring, cylinder structures rising towards the sky. A huge basket will be on top to collect fresh rain water. People will eat the delicious fruits grown in the shadows of factories and other buildings. A railing will connect the structures to allow for manuevarability. We will lead a simple life, with very little electricity use.

More coming later, I must eat dinner!

Now I have been told plenty of times before to 'put the pipe down' but the above quoted by you, Qwachansey is disturbing at best. There is no way you honestly think along those lines and of that being even feasible.

If you will be running for any sort of high office of the land I'll make sure to put a stop to your fanatic plans of reducing humanity's progress and population with your unjustifiable and immoral ideologies, that you sugarcoat as 'peace-loving' and beneficial to the earth through the necessary sacrifice of humanity. Well... How about you set up an example of such sacrifices by going first buddy.

Yeah I hope this thread gets locked.
 
That's disappointing because

a) Why is it a bad idea
and
b) I thought you were a better person than that. My bad.
Why is it a bad idea? How many buildings would have to be destroyed to build your new ones? Where would the money come from? How many people would be put out of work when you ban meat? How many people would starve due to the meat ban? Have you read about the water cycle yet? Apparently not. Need any more reasons why it's a bad idea?
 
That plan of yours is full of flaws. First of all, you cannot be healthy and well-balanced if you have no meat in your diet. And what are the spiraling structures made out of? I'm sure there would have to be trees killed in some way to make those buildings. And how will anyone make money if new businesses can't be made. Overall, no one would vote for you and you would likely get lots of rotten fruit thrown at you, you crazy hippie :mad::nonono::mad::nonono:.

I consider myself very healthy. They will be made of whatever material I pick at the time. Why would trees be destroyed? As I said, in existing cities. And, if trees/nature were to be destroyed, it will benefit the environment so greatly that 1,000,000,000 trees will outweigh the life of 1,000. It's like sacrificing yourself to stop a plane from crashing into a building. Kill yourself to save many.

And yes, that IS a hypocrytical statement, because that WOULD harm the environment. But it would be so minute and have such a brilliant and happy affect I believe for now it is the right idea.
 
Sorry, I missed it. I'll gladly answer it now.

One of my acts will be the "Conscience Act". It will inform meat - eaters of the murder they are being involved in. This will make it easier for them when I pass the "Vegetarian Act". Three guesses to what that means. Next, I'll have the "Debuilding Act" to stop all major construction. The "Population Act" will stop the destruction of the planet.

For the rebuilding, I propose soaring, cylinder structures rising towards the sky. A huge basket will be on top to collect fresh rain water. People will eat the delicious fruits grown in the shadows of factories and other buildings. A railing will connect the structures to allow for manuevarability. We will lead a simple life, with very little electricity use.

More coming later, I must eat dinner!

Yes, I suppose we should jail every animal that kills to live as well... Oh wait, that means everything that can't photosynthesize... Uhhh... yes, by your standards we're all murderers, heaven help us all.

Really, I hope to death your not serious about all this. You obviously have no clue how the environment really works, or you wouldn't be posting this stuff. Why don't you actually learn about what your going to argue before you make a fool of your self and successfully make everyone who reads your arguments want to stuff chansey cards up your nose. :tongue::rolleyes:
 
Why is it a bad idea? How many buildings would have to be destroyed to build your new onesNone: as I explained, they would be in the remains of destroyed buildings? Where would the money come from[Money? I don't any money when I have control of the world! And, as I stated, we will lead a simple life. Who needs to buy things? Money will not be important.B]?[/B] How many people would be put out of work when you ban meatHow many jobs will be created when I make these structures? A job will be "tree - gardner" or "fruit harvester"? How many people would starve due to the meat banNone.? Have you read about the water cycle yetNo, why?? Apparently not. Need any more reasons why it's a bad idea?

Yes, I need a lot more.
 
Yes, I suppose we should jail every animal that kills to live as well... Oh wait, that means everything that can't photosynthesize... Uhhh... yes, by your standards we're all murderers, heaven help us all.

Really, I hope to death your not serious about all this. You obviously have no clue how the environment really works, or you wouldn't be posting this stuff. Why don't you actually learn about what your going to argue before you make a fool of your self and successfully make everyone who reads your arguments want to stuff chansey cards up your nose. :tongue::rolleyes:

Your superior attitude is actually making me vomit. I have this disgusting taste in my mouth now.
 
Yes, I need a lot more.
Do you really think the world grows enough vegetable matter to feed the entire population? Sure production could be increased after the meat ban, but what happens in the interim? Please tell me, what part of a huge cylindrical tower is simple?

And as for the water cycle, You don't think capturing massive amounts of water would be harmful to the environment? Plenty of harm is caused by things like that already, so capturing water would hardly improve anything.
 
Superior attitude? You mean because I actually know what I'm talking about, while you propose CRAZY ideas with no actual knowledge to support them.


Welcome to life sir. This is how you debate something. Don't have facts and data, you don't have an argument. Life sucks, get used to it.

If you DO know all about how the environment works, then at least show to us that your not stupid. Explain your points. Don't make these silly blanket statements such as "meat eating is murder". If your going to say stuff like that with out facts, expect to lose your argument.
 
Do you really think the world grows enough vegetable matter to feed the entire population? Sure production could be increased after the meat ban, but what happens in the interim? Please tell me, what part of a huge cylindrical tower is simple?

And as for the water cycle, You don't think capturing massive amounts of water would be harmful to the environment? Plenty of harm is caused by things like that already, so capturing water would hardly improve anything.

The population will be much, much smaller.

As for water, there would not be massive amounts of it caught, since there will be no need for dishwashers/showers/toilets/whatever.

Back to back posts merged. The following information has been added:

Superior attitude? You mean because I actually know what I'm talking about, while you propose CRAZY ideas with no actual knowledge to support them.


Welcome to life sir. This is how you debate something. Don't have facts and data, you don't have an argument. Life sucks, get used to it.

Life sucks, that's why I aim to change it. And I repeat, how is this a crazy idea?
 
Last edited:
Your superior attitude is actually making me vomit. I have this disgusting taste in my mouth now.

Says the guy who states that we're a plague on this planet.

Excuse me, I need to take some murdered animals and make some chicken cordon bleu, that's a dead chicken, a dead pig, and a dead calf because all we needed was the cheese from the cow.
 
The population will be much, much smaller.

As for water, there would not be massive amounts of it caught, since there will be no need for dishwashers/showers/toilets/whatever.
Why would the population be smaller? Why wouldn't there be need for a toilet? Where do you think people will go? No showers? Wait, I think I just answered my own question. The population will be smaller because everyone is going to die of bacteria poisoning. Good to know.
 
How will the population get smaller? Through people dying of sheer hunger? Or thirst? Or bacteria devouring us slowly? Or people going insane because you, of all people, are the president?
 
Not to mention saying we should all pretty much curl up and die because we "hurt the earth by existing", or something like that.
But then our decomposing bodies would flood the waters with massive amounts of nutrients, which would it turn, cause algal blooms, which would then kill off all plant and fish life, etc. etc.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top