Scipio
New Member
However there is a card saying "take some cards from the Lost Zone".
Where would said card be?
However there is a card saying "take some cards from the Lost Zone".
Unfortunately I think that's doubtful since that would turn the Lost Zone into a discard pile with a fancy name.However there is a card saying "take some cards from the Lost Zone".
But it excludes Pokemon (and supporters).I'm gessing that he's talking about hipowdon X. It tells you to shuffle all cards in play back into your deck. Acording to the rule book that I have the lost zone is in play.
Those cards both imply that there's more than one Magnezone and Absol Prime, which confuses me. Magnezone Prime (above) scares me though. It's power says "as often as you like during your turn, you may attach an Energy from your Lost Zone to one of your Benched Pokemon." and a single-Metal attack that does 40 and says "You may put one card from your hand into your Lost Zone." Little too much synergy with the previously revealed Zone...No, the Lost Zone is not into play.
You wanna see it ? Just click here !
Those cards both imply that there's more than one Magnezone and Absol Prime, which confuses me. Magnezone Prime (above) scares me though. It's power says "as often as you like during your turn, you may attach an Energy from your Lost Zone to one of your Benched Pokemon." and a single-Metal attack that does 40 and says "You may put one card from your hand into your Lost Zone." Little too much synergy with the previously revealed Zone...
For those of you that care, the Absol's power states that "Once during your turn, if Absol Knocked Out a Defending Pokemon during your last turn, you may use this power. Send that Pokemon and all cards attached to it to the Lost Zone." It's attacks are [D] for 20 and [D][D][C] for 60 (with no effects stated, which seems odd to me).
EDIT: However, reading the beginning and end descriptions for the cards, it says that there are multiple Magnezone and Absol Prime, similar to how there were multiple Arceus Lv.X.
What? Am I missing something, where are you getting this information from?
In play? Here is the fundamental difference between our views. I am certain that with the current cardpool, there won't be a deck which can only focus on hand/deck actions to get 6 Pokémon to the lost zone.
Sigh. Hunter ruins an otherwise nice argument.