Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

HGSS-on Nitro Slug

Status
Not open for further replies.
Next year pablo, maybe by then you can become port of the top 4 in mexico nationals aswell. So how did you perform in worlds anyway?? I didn`t saw your name in the top cut after all the high and mighty "level and skill" a six prize writer needs to be a pro.

Well, glad you liked the audio, I was hoping to use rammstein, but the remixes were pretty lame, and copyright crap is quite annoying... Now why don`t you share your work too supes, your signature suggest you actually create decks, let me see something "worthy"

So I just have to show you a better deck than yours, eh?


Take. Your. Pick.
 
So in the end you are just jealous of attention, no wonder you went all emo berserk about the thread, seeing someone else has what you beg for. Come on show me anything you actually exposed or built, don`t deflect on your own fails, keep writing kid bedtime stories, someday you might get a trilogy about your... wait you don`t even write anything original, how can I expect an original deck from YOU.

All that jibber jabber about consistency and clockwork harmony went to waste by just checking your statistics, shielding behind other people thruth or success and witch hunting only shows the narrow mind of a hillbilly afraid of lightbulbs or anything new or different.

Porii Sames is the unbeatable example of how SPAM is done, learn from him before trying again.

---------- Post added 08/15/2011 at 01:14 PM ----------

The changes i would make:

-2 Juniper
-3 Sages

+1 PONT
+2 Engineers
+2 Seeker

I hate sages and i like engineers, juniper can be effective depending on the situation but engineers is quite good ij high energy decks, should help to stop throwing away the seeker, which quite a few people have said you may need

-1 Burned tower
+1 energy retrieval

For those times you need an energy and burned tower fails.

Thats all i can think of for now

Engineers are actually a nice addition, energy cards show up really often in the oppening hand, but seeker is still not tempting

Burned tower might be random, but it stays in play for the whole game due to the lack of popular stadiums, the energy always comes from the top of the deck after all, not from the hand.
 
Last edited:
So in the end you are just jealous of attention, no wonder you went all emo berserk about the thread, seeing someone else has what you beg for. Come on show me anything you actually exposed or built, don`t deflect on your own fails, keep writing kid bedtime stories, someday you might get a trilogy about your... wait you don`t even write anything original, how can I expect an original deck from YOU.

All that jibber jabber about consistency and clockwork harmony went to waste by just checking your statistics, shielding behind other people thruth or success and witch hunting only shows the narrow mind of a hillbilly afraid of lightbulbs or anything new or different.

Porii Sames is the unbeatable example of how SPAM is done, learn from him before trying again.

This is your thread. The burden of proof lies with you. All I've seen is one single video, which doesn't even go on to show whether or not you pulled this stunt more than once. And it doesn't even matter! It would be easy to rig a video for this, just by only recording the most successful draw. But I'll tell you what kid. I'm no quitter.

Pick a date, at least 3 days from now. I will come onto a live streaming site and play this deck against a good player. Anyone who wants to volunteer to be my opponent? Step right up. A live demonstration--you're full of hot air.
 
Both of you need to cool it before this topic gets locked. You guys were relatively civil to start with, and now you're just seeing who can pee the furthest. Tone things down a bit, please?
 
Both of you need to cool it before this topic gets locked. You guys were relatively civil to start with, and now you're just seeing who can pee the furthest. Tone things down a bit, please?

But I'm having fun. Nothing wrong with some friendly fun, right?
 
This is your thread. The burden of proof lies with you. All I've seen is one single video, which doesn't even go on to show whether or not you pulled this stunt more than once. And it doesn't even matter! It would be easy to rig a video for this, just by only recording the most successful draw. But I'll tell you what kid. I'm no quitter.

Pick a date, at least 3 days from now. I will come onto a live streaming site and play this deck against a good player. Anyone who wants to volunteer to be my opponent? Step right up. A live demonstration--you're full of hot air.

I must grant you that, my PC wont be able to handle the HQ editing, and I`m sick of the lack of RAM, I gave a copy to a friend, hope he can convert it faster than my "lentium inside", it`s the irony of having a camera that is 5 times more expensive than your computer...

And no, the record is about both lost and won games, I wouldn`t pull such a lame scam just to prove my point, even the Power Point video states that "you won`t always pull the perfect opening hand or the first turn, is just an example". But try it if you are good enough.

Meanwhile I uploaded a new Power Point presentation about Virizion Donk.
 
Getting banned from pokegym to just tell you guys how stupid you are and how easy it is to prove both of you wrong is it worth it give me a yes or no?
 
Honestly, 10 Basics is not enough. Imagine your opponent goes first. You average 1 basic every six cards, and you have seven, so you'll probably only get 1 Basic. Your opponent plays ZPS/Black Out and donks you T1, because you couldn't collector due to your opponent going first.

See what I'm saying?
 
Ouch. I looked at the pokemon only, then went to post. I didn't even notice the lack of collector.
THe pokemon are all basics!
Here it is:
+ 2-2-2 Typhlosion Prime
+ 2 Rare Candy
+ 2 Pokemon Collector

-1 Dual Ball
-1 Juniper
-1 PONT
-1 Sage's Training
-1 PlusPower
-1 Pokedex
-1 Energy Returner
-1 Burned Tower
-2 Fire Energy
 
Tried this deck as posted by the author and it does work (to my amazement) better than I thought it would, but the second you get any kind of trainer lock the game seems to be over. Being able to control the top deck seemed critical to me and he uses trainers for that. Typhlosion seemed to work better even with taking damage. I loved the idea of all of the cards being basics. If it were not for trainer lock I think that this could tweak into something. I just wanted to test it out to give it a fair shake and this is how it worked out for me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top