ShadowGuard
<a href="http://pokegym.net/forums/showpost.php?p=
Bring back the old rules and some of the Plasma stage 2 Pokémon (Metagross, Magnezone, maybe Crobat) will be actually playable. =/
Yeah, but it won't really address what has caused problems through out most of the game's lifespan; lower Stages that just exist to Evolve instead of really contributing to set-up.
Yeah, but it won't really address what has caused problems through out most of the game's lifespan; lower Stages that just exist to Evolve instead of really contributing to set-up.
I'm with Kayle here. This confuses me. That principle, even though it isn't quite an accurate description of the card game, is pretty much the point of the Pokemon franchise.
Aside from that, "lower stages" have actually gotten quite a bit of attention in terms of utility in the Pokemon TCG. Between many of them having damage preventing attacks or abilities (Deino, Squirtle), the entire baby mechanic making a "lower stage" entirely essential to set up for a while in a format just a year or so old, two iterations of Eevee: one with Call for Family and the new Plasma Eevee grabbing your Evolutions, Ascension Zorua, Charmander grabbing energy from the discard, other lower stages with Call for Family attacks, Charmeleon with Rage/Celebi EX....
I just don't see that problem as much as you do.
Okay, yeah. Make sure to be a little clearer on your point.
I especially appreciate SC's examples because those are mostly all from a format I can remember! Man those Basics were so good.
To be fair though, Squirtle has pretty much one of the best abilities you could ever ask for...
Yeah, but it won't really address what has caused problems through out most of the game's lifespan; lower Stages that just exist to Evolve instead of really contributing to set-up.
Yeah, but it won't really address what has caused problems through out most of the game's lifespan; lower Stages that just exist to Evolve instead of really contributing to set-up.
This is the statement I was responding to, and to this statement I feel as if my response is warranted, and feel that most of the responses after mine actually agree with my argument: that we do, in fact, have basics/stage 1s of Evolution lines that are supposedly helpful to set up.
Now, I never said, and probably should have stated outright, that we had good basics and stage 1s, currently, that assist in set up. I feel like most of the responses were arguing against that point, that I never made.
Bring back the old rules and some of the Plasma stage 2 Pokémon (Metagross, Magnezone, maybe Crobat) will be actually playable. =/
Finally, I think we may be talking past each other because of one crucial point: I think assisting in evolution is assisting set-up. To "set-up" a Darkrai/Hydreigon deck is to, at least partially, evolve to Hydreigon. So when we are discussing lower stages that "just exist to Evolve" instead of "contributing to set-up," I feel like we are speaking of something that doesn't quite make sense. If they contribute to evolution, don't they help set up?
True, you didn't. You simply said that over "most of the game's life-span" we had a consistent problem with having lower stages that do not assist in set-up.Please re-read what I said. Did I say "We have no lower Stages that do anything other than Evolve?" No I did not.
The bolded part is the part that was left out of the original post. Once that is added in, I agree wholeheartedly with what you are saying.While my wording may not have been perfect, I expressed my belief that the game suffers largely because of lower Stages that don't adequately contribute to set-up to compensate for the inherent advantages of Basic Pokémon.
That is a distinction you didn't really have to make, as many lower evolutions do significantly help set up. I think we were both talking about significant advantages, so we can move on from this. However, significant is very different than significant enough to "compensate for the inherent advantages of Basic Pokemon."I had hoped I wouldn't have to waste time specifying things like "significantly helps with set-up" either, since I do struggle to remain concise and have been advised I should give more heed to the context of statements.
When did I imply that assisting in evolution isn't assisting in set-up?We aren't talking past each other, in that I am pretty sure most of us realize that assisting in Evolution is aiding set-up. The only one to imply it wasn't so far would be you, LibertyFigter.
Once again, this is a significant change from your first post, and once again, if this is your argument, I agree.Even those that do contribute in a substantive way need to contribute enough to offset the inherent advantages Basic Pokémon enjoy.
LibertyFigter: As has no been clarified over PM, I do believe some of what I have said was conveyed in the original post, given what I myself was responding to. That being said, you have explained what confused you and at this point I believe further dissecting each others' posts will not make the point(s) in question any clearer.
There are some interesting tidbits I would like to discuss, but I've probably derailed this thread enough.
Getting back on topic, I am interested in finding out if the Eeveelutions work well with Vileplume or not and frankly just about every other card that has been mentioned in this thread. XD
Out of the Eeveelutions, I think Leafeon benefits most from Vileplume. Because of the increasing popularity of Keldeo EX (especially with Japan's tournament results), Leafeon could function well in Vileplume, probably better than Shaymin EX or Virizon. Shaymin and both Virizons require 2+ energy, while Leafeon just needs one. In a deck with little energy movement/acceleration, one less energy makes the difference. Plus, Leafeon has more of a surprise factor. An energy-less Eevee could quickly knockout a Keldeo on the spot. With Vileplume out, Leafeon always knockouts an eviolited Keldeo with 3+ energies, and even without Vileplume, Leafeon can KO Keldeo with 5+ energies, which is about average mid to late game.LibertyFigter: As has no been clarified over PM, I do believe some of what I have said was conveyed in the original post, given what I myself was responding to. That being said, you have explained what confused you and at this point I believe further dissecting each others' posts will not make the point(s) in question any clearer.
There are some interesting tidbits I would like to discuss, but I've probably derailed this thread enough.
Getting back on topic, I am interested in finding out if the Eeveelutions work well with Vileplume or not and frankly just about every other card that has been mentioned in this thread. XD