Scottistru
New Member
/in
me is needing 17
me is needing 17
Can I sugguest you do 16 so we can start soon lt soon so people don't lose interest?
5 rounds imo. <3333
Agreed. However, with 16 we'll end up with the following breakdown after swiss- (Assuming higher seed wins pairdowns)
1 5-0
2 4-1
5 3-2
5 2-3
2 1-4
1 0-5
Now, it could vary to the point where 2 3-2s could cut, or it could be a case of 4 4-1's without an undefeated.
16 with 5rds is a vicious number (Just like 10 with 4 rds...)
I suggest the 5th round, but caution based on this.
EDIT: Upon further calculation, I highly suggest the fifth round, or one 3-1 would bubble cut. Swiss+1 is better than a 3-1 bubbling.
To be honest I am not gonna think too hard on this at all and calculate anything or use any software. i am just gonna make this simple and smooth for 4 rounds and T4. I don't really care about TOM honestly. I know some of you would disagree with this but this isn't a Official pokemon tournament that has a real judge and real staff. Just a pokemon player that would like to help people into preparing their deck for nationals and just for fun.
I know, I was just pointing out what would likely work best.
16 people with 4 Rds top 4 WILL require resistance calcs. I'm happy to do those for you if you'd like.
I would love if you do that. however I did not know that so I can do 5 rounds if that works best.
5rds would likely be optimal for the calculating stuff. Also, see my IM about other matters.
Enter me please and thank you!
Uh... do not forget me >.>
sorry you have to take me off. I can't make it I'm going out of town right now.... I really wish I was here for this but I wont be :,(. I'll make sure to check the details at another time! ((