Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

Price estimate

Those are Chinese cards.

I wouldn't be surprised if at one time they were my cards.

I have to say that I never noticed those errors on them before.
However, I just checked mine and every copy of the cards you have pictured have the exact same errors.

So, I would guess that most, if not all, copies of those Chinese cards have those errors on them.

Oh, and the Weedle as well, now that I'm looking at it.

Maybe more of them. I haven't checked them all.
 
Not sure about weedle i have a few foreign weedles chinese and korean and i think maderin chinese look very similar in text/font.

Well perhaps ill list these errors on ebay and see what happen. They are still errors no matter how many there are.

but that doduo is the most messed up one of them all it looks as if theres a picture at the end of the gold blocks as if it was supposed to be another print of some kind.

hey pop do you think the price/value/demand for foregin base cards is gonna go up? because im seeing foregin boxes selling closer to the american unlimted as each week passes.
 
Not for nothing but there is an advantage to all this.
Not many if at all are these cards listed, yet if i were to list them saying they are similar to my test cards and showing a comparision i can prob get hundreds of dollars for these errors.
 
Not for nothing but there is an advantage to all this.
Not many if at all are these cards listed, yet if i were to list them saying they are similar to my test cards and showing a comparision i can prob get hundreds of dollars for these errors.
doesn't sound ethical/honest to me: why would they be considered an 'error' if ALL the chinese cards from this set have this issue?

jmho.
 
Well dark raichu is still an error and it has 83/82
Dark arbok has 23000 on the date.
Those are all errors but still errors none the less.
besides im not claiming its test cards im saying its similar to those gold areas on the test cards.
It's not a claim its an observation.
It's not like im gonna say on the listing its one of a kind or anything. Ill list it with BIN/BO and see what happens. The buyers know what intrest them they know what they want so its up to them if this sells or not.

Ill just show the comparisons of the two and show their similaritys. if they like it they will buy it if not then it wont sell.
 
they are errors but the value of them is high as some other errors.if all the chinese cards have these erroes they techinally arent errors
 
they are errors but the value of them is high as some other errors.if all the chinese cards have these erroes they techinally arent errors

No, they're still errors.

Dark Raichu being 83/82 is NOT an error.
Anyone claiming it is is either misinformed or lying.
Not that there isn't an error on Dark Raichu. There is. But it's not the set number.
 
What about dark arbok or base vulpix?
Also dark raichu is still listed as an error on ebay as well as shadowless. There are listings that if its shadowless its an error. Not sure if thats still going on but it was like that years ago.
 
What about dark arbok or base vulpix?
Also dark raichu is still listed as an error on ebay as well as shadowless. There are listings that if its shadowless its an error. Not sure if thats still going on but it was like that years ago.

Shadowless cards are not errors. People are just completely misinformed or ignorant.


Base Vulpix is an error because it was eventually corrected. However, the error version is extremely common so the value is low. The Base Set 2 Vulpix with the same error should be worth more imo, but people still consider it the same as the Base one so it's value is equally as low.


Dark Raichu is listed as an error on Ebay because there is a different error with the card. Dark Raichu's evolution box is a light gray color instead of dark gray. Also, the card reads "Put Raichu on the Basic Pokémon" instead of "Put Dark Raichu on the Basic Pokémon".
Since the card was finally corrected for the release of Legendary Collection, the Team Rocket Dark Riachu is an error card.
 
Your definition of an error is a bit off.
Just because an error has been corrected or not has nothing to do with whether it is an error or now.
For example, Shining Tyranitar has the word "hust" instead of "just" in the text.
That's an error. Period. The fact that it was never released in a corrected version has absolutely nothing to do with it being an error or not.
It does have A LOT to do with whether a specific error is collectible or valuable, however!

If an error appears on every copy of a card, then it's collectibility and value get no boost from the error.
But its still an error.
 
I would imagine, Errors that are "fixed" in later sets, like Dark Raichu, probably have no effect on the value of a previously uncorrected error card from a completely different a set, either.

Likewise, fixed cards that were released very late in a set's run, such as Rocket's Minefield Gym, are actually more valuable then the error.
It really depends on which there's more of, and since usually mistakes are caught early, that tends to be the fixed version. Though that's not always the case.
In all honesty the mistakes themselves are irreverent, just as long as there's something that makes the card different, and rarer.
 
Let me see if I can break this down:

An error is a card that shows a feature that is slightly off. Typically released in large quantities or for entire print runs. Examples would be Dark Arbok (2300) and Vulpix (HP). It simply has a feature that differs from the norm.

A misprint would be a unique omission or mistake on the card. It is usually fixed quickly and later print runs show a correction (Dark Persian no HP, Blastoise no stage, Ninetales no 80 damage). Limited numbers are unintentionally released, as printed, to the public.
 
Ok been having comp issues so been difficult to list this.
Also im still sorting through my cards and its impossible to list them all in one shot so i will list them as i go along.
I have 240 sealed marril promo cards
Only had 2 booster boxes i ever had in my life Arceus and undaunted. Still have all the cards that came with those boxes.

List of holo cards that were pulled out fresh out the pack mint condition. put in a sleeve and toploader..
Arceus
AR1
AR2
AR3
AR4
AR5
AR6
AR7
AR8
AR9
Charizard 1/99
Frosslass 2/99
Kabutops 4/99
Luxray 5/99
Probopass 7/99
Salamence 8/99
Swalot 9/99
Tangrowth 10/99
Zapdos 12/99
Arceus 94/99
Arceus 95/99
Salamence lv x 98/99

Undaunted
Bellossom 1/90
Espeon 2/90 x2
Gliscor 4/90 x2
Magcargo 6/90
Scizor 7/90
Togekiss 9/90
Umbreon 10/90
Espeon 81/90
Houndoom 82/90
Scizor 84/90
Slowking 85/90
umbreon 86/90
Kyogre&groundon top half and bottom half 87&88/90
Rayquaza&deoxys top half 89/90

other cards that was put into a sleeve and toploader fresh out the pack mint condition

Walrein ex 99/108
Alakazam lv x 103/111
Lucario 2/17 (think this was a tin)
Machamp lv x 98/100

entei 4/132
entei near mint-mint tin HGSS20 promo
Ill add more later.
 
I don't mean to be rude or anything, but do you really expect someone to give you prices for every single card you list? Just type in the name of the card into Ebay and click the completed listings box and choose. That'll give you the best price for more-or-less any card rare/holo and up. Or if its not Ultra Rare, you could also just type it into Troll & Toad and see what they value it at. Most people agree that there normal card prices are accurate.
 
Thats what this forum is for aint it? to list cards and get a price quote estimate.
Also i heard T&T is not the best place to figure out price estimates so why are you guys saying to check T&T.
 
Back
Top