L00p_H01eS
New Member
wait we dont get invites for getting 1st in nationals??? (usa)
The World Championship is for the world's best. If the US has half of all the players in the world (for example), then they probably have 32 of the best 64 players in the world. Don't bring up interest in the game.
A tournament with the best players in the world trying to figure out the best of the best player in the world. I wonder what we should call it...
Come on! It doest cost POP much to pay a few trips. It sounds really ugly to say that some countrys dont get trips, cause theirs not enough sales/players.
No, I'm pretty sure that is the main purpose of any World Championship. I'd like to see some kind of advertisement about Worlds that is NOT along the lines of, 'see who the best in the world is'.Why can people not understand that the World Championships is about more than just seeing who the best in the World is?
A tournament with the best players in the world trying to figure out the best of the best player in the world. I wonder what we should call it...
No, I'm pretty sure that is the main purpose of any World Championship. I'd like to see some kind of advertisement about Worlds that is NOT along the lines of, 'see who the best in the world is'.
Lets do the math....a JR/SR and some MA players are under 18, meaning a legal guardian/parent has to be pd for also. So, for each trip, basically double that for PUI....2 RT flights, 4 nights in a hotel where it costs a min. 100 bucks per night. Lets say the average RT ticket in the USA is 400 to FL and back. PUI just put out 800 for flights, 400 for hotel and that is just for one invite + trip in the USA. ($1200) Overseas.....count on doubling that easily. Now, multiply that by the number of invites and PUI spends a whole lotta cash on the tourney. Dont forget, they also have to fly in judges, other staff and PUI employees for set up and running said tourney. You also have to fly in the international judges and interpretors. Hmmm........not so small a budget now, is it??
Keith
Prime, who are you to state for who and what the world championship is made for?
Try thinking of Worlds as country vs country, rather than "the best players in the world." You're (ideally) taking the best players in each country and playing them off against each other to find out who the best is.
If all the players we invite are from the US, what is our motivation to run the WORLD Championships?
No, we don't fail to realize that at all.
In addition, what you may fail to realize is that there were over 200 players from the US participating in Worlds last year out of a total of approximately 398 players. You also are only pointing out that the US has lost a few invites, but not that the total invitation numbers will remain the same this year. Meaning, that we are keeping the attendance levels the same, just not for 'you'.
Also, our data doesn't support the assumption that the biggest growth is in the US. International player base, and sales numbers are up consistently over the last several years, so what about them?
Whether or not it's you, or others saying this, I'll reiterate that the general tone I've gotten from this entire topic is extremely ethnocentric, and self concerned. You want the world to be better represented, but not if that means the US loses invites. So, the only assumption left is that you want the total attendance increased across the board to create this balance.
You really need to look no further than Magic: The Gathering to see a number of flaws in your arguments. The DCI has more players than POP, likely by several thousand. However, to my knowledge, their World Championships has never exceeded 256 total players. Last year, our World Championships was 398 players+. It simply does not matter to us that we have 3 age groups, and that 'your' age group didn't have 256 players invited.
We pull our invite numbers based on our goals for our World championship event, regardless of total players in the system. In addition, IF we were to ever consider something along these lines, it would follow that we would want to see numbers close, or equal to the total player base for a game such as Magic in EACH age group that would have a World Championship attendance at that level. So, assuming that MTG has 100,000 players worldwide (hypothetical number), we'd be looking to have 300,000 players worldwide before even considering that type of a move. Even if that were the case, it would have to be discussed as to whether that truly met the goals from brand and OP for what the World Championships should be.
Prof. Dav
Whether or not it's logical depends on what your goals for Worlds are. The general tone I get from this entire discussion is that more people want to be invited, period. If we open more invitations, more people have the opportunity, and therefore believe that they'll be able to go.
The World Championships is an elite event, where a limited number of players are invited to compete. That limit does not increase proportionately to the number of players in the world at a given time. Therefore, the more players there are, the more elite the event becomes, as invitations become harder to get, and are at a premium, as they should be.
...
Prof. Dav
So, the general tone I'm getting from this thread is that people think it should be *easier* to get to Worlds?
Think about that. Sure, it's the most premium event of the year, and everyone *wants* to go, on our dime, but would that really be a meaningful championship?
Prof. Dav
What ever happend to pokemon being FREE?