Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

Werewolf xvi the rise of team plasma: Town wins

338

Just for the record, PMysterious posting 8 minutes after Jellyfisher calls him out with a kinda useless post, to me, seems like he's been lurking. Lynch worthy? No. But something to note.

This. Care to elaborate PMysterious?

Vote: PMysterious until I hear a reasonable explanation. Or until the novelty of voting wears off.
Posted with Mobile style...
 
338



This. Care to elaborate PMysterious?

Vote: PMysterious until I hear a reasonable explanation. Or until the novelty of voting wears off.
Posted with Mobile style...

Why is it that all your posts in the game have been accusing people. And you're voting for him until the "novelty" of voting wears off? Sounds like you're just voting for the fun of it and jumping on the bandwagon.
 
I really do think that this game can be one-sided to newer players because we are usually nervous about what will happen. @Jellyfisher: Are you happy now that I posted?

Okay, you posted. But as Pikamaster pointed out, it was a short while after I voted for you. So I'm not satisfied with you yet.

I can consider that ultimatedra has been acting kinda weird. Has anyone else noticed that? I mean he changed his profile picture, says he's a trainer (Even though that's probably false), and challenged cabd for no reason. For those reasons, Challenge: ultimatedra (If he doesn't accept, Vote: ultimatedra)

How is changing his profile picture weird? And if I am correct, he never said that he was a trainer, that was cabd. And still, why is it probably false that he's a trainer? In fact, the only thing he did that is weird on this list is challenge cabd.

@JewelQuest: If you insist. Unvote: Ultimatedra

You're sort of starting to jump around now. You start out by saying how weird ultimatedra has been acting (most of the things you stated weren't even weird) and then you vote for him. Then, as soon as someone says that you should have waited until he responded to your challenge to vote for him, you unvote him. Right now, I'm willing to accept that this is because your new, and still trying to get the hang of the game. But you had better start being more careful, or you will most likely find yourself being lynched.
 
Well, I now believe that all people have posted since the start of Day 1. PMysterious is acting rather strange, but I know from experience that, when you're on the defensive, it is rather difficult to act normal. I am going to hold off from voting for him because, as others have mentioned, he seems to be simply lurking (which is a viable strategy from either Townies or Wolves). However, I strongly disagree with his challenge and vote to Ultimatedra.

PMysterious, it honestly looks a lot like you're a wolf, jussayin'. You voted for Ultimatedra to primarily get pressure off of yourself and turn eyes another direction, which is a very wolf-ish tactic. I know you're a new player here, but some explanation would be nice. My vote will probably go towards you in the near future, unless something changes fast.

As to ProHawk, care to elaborate at all how you know that at least one user is not a trainer? I assume this is simply your own role, which could mean you are a Pokemon or something. I agree that wolves will probably be trainers.
 
PMysterious-
Highly suspicious last few hours from you. First you post 18 minutes after being called out, which is a tell-tale sign of a lurker. On top of that, your reasons for voting Ultimareda (Especially the avatar issue) are completely ridiculous. Ulti changes his avatar a ton.

I'll be honest, it seems likely to me that if Ulti's challenge has something to with his role, it probably has to do with him then being able to pick out people's character type (Trainer, or one of the other types of characters we don't know of yet) from the "update" that follows.

Back to PMysterious after my little side note-
Your instant unvote after being called out strikes me as scummy, but that's not a good reason for a vote; nor is your other plays at this point, only due to the fact that I'm willing to accept this as being because of your newness.

Can't say I'll the say the same in a (real) day or two unless your play improves.
 
Votes to lynch : 16!

Vote count:

Diaz (1): sdrawkcab
Redados1 (1): Diaz
Dave628 (2): pokemonfreak5, scottistru
Pmysterious (3): jellyfisher, jewelquest, orcmonkey2000


Correct me if I am wrong please.
Posted with Mobile style...
Posted with Mobile style...
 
Last edited:
Vote count:

Diaz (1): sdrawkcab
Redados1 (1): Diaz
Dave628 (2): pokemonfreak5, scottistru
Pmysterious (3): jellyfisher, jewelquest, orcmonkey2000


Correct me if I am wrong please.
Posted with Mobile style...
Posted with Mobile style...

Can you also plz include number of votes needed ot lynch to we don't have to check the update everytime. Thnx
 
#351

Well, things blew up while I was gone. I spend an hour feeling blue about an exam and things start happening again.


Orcmonkey2000: Voting for the novelty of voting? That's what your post intimates to me.

Barkjon: Good thoughts.

PMysterious: Why do you think that Ultimatedra is not a trainer? Didn't A/AM show that there was a challenge that occurred, only broken up by the curly, brown-haired guy? Your logic doesn't seem to hold.

A/AM: Sure, YOU can edit, but we can't. LAME. :thumb:
 
I accept redados' challenge if it is real.
Unvote redados
Vote sdrawkcab

He voted for a townie. That is something a wolf would do.
 
@cabd: the facepalm was the fact that I missed the word trainer in the update.
Although, PM seems scummy, I think it is more likely attributable to newbness than dave's tell is. My vote stays.
 
Why is it that all your posts in the game have been accusing people. And you're voting for him until the "novelty" of voting wears off? Sounds like you're just voting for the fun of it and jumping on the bandwagon.

Granted, I have been pretty accusatory in most of my posts. I'm guessing it's a bit early/unwise to be doing that at this point in the game. I'll dial it back some. Thanks for the tip (whether you meant it that way or not). :tongue:

As for my vote, I stand by it. The vote is legitimate, and is based upon behavior I find to be strange. Also note the fact that several posts were made between the time I read Pikamaster's post (#338), which I quoted, and the time I slowly tapped my message out on my phone. I was actually only the second person to vote for PMysterious--hardly a bandwagon jump, if you ask me.

Orcmonkey2000: Voting for the novelty of voting? That's what your post intimates to me.

See above. Novelty's only part of it--I was going to wait until the end of the day to cast my vote, but PMysterious' inconsistent behavior and suspected lurking, combined with the fact that I wanted to do something other than post speculation and accusations led me to go ahead and do it. Noobish? Maybe. Bad choice? I'll let y'all be the judge of that.
 
Still not to much to go on yet. Interesting little bits of information here and there though. The n00bs that need to either very quickly improve their play, or get lynched are also starting to show them selves.

As to anyone who questions any inactivity, I'm not making it up to lie low or anything. I have 3 exams, and then finals week between now and the 30th. I just want to make it clear that I'm not using this as some weird new strategy. I kind of wish I was... yuck.

Anyway... I'm pleased with how the day is progressing. We have some good conversation going on.
 
@Diaz: How do you know that the guy sdrawkcab is a townsperson or not? If you did know, then how? Is there anyway you know who is a townie or not? If there is, then I like you to speak up. Plus, you are getting in every single nervy under my skin.
@orcmonkey2000: Is there any reason that you want to vote for me other than the suspicious reason you came up with? If there is, say it. Otherwise, get off my case
@JewelQuest: Do you remember that I'm the on the saved your life in Stark Mountain before the game started. If I didn't save you, then would you even be in this game? Your answer would be a no.
@Jellyfisher: Nice offence. I really want to see you try to be on the defence for a little while. If there was a better reason to vote for me other than saying I haven't posted in a while. I only asked just out of curiosity because new players do that at times.

My point is that I am innocent in all standards. The offence of three of you and the annoyance of Diaz is not good enough for me to back down at all. If you have better reasons to vote for me, explain or just unvote.
Challenge: Jellyfisher, JewelQuest, and orcmonkey 2000 at the same time.
 
Back
Top