Look, the most important fact of all of this is that both players were apparently ok with the judge's decision at the time of the misplay. Is that true or not?? If the players were ok with this at the time, then everything posted/insinuated here is truly just sour grapes and really doesn't warrant any more comment (unless we'd like to discuss the proper course of action for similar situations in the future.) If the players/judges want a discussion about proper course of action, sure, I'll bite. I'd very very upset if one of my judges came close to a gl for this situation at one of my events. The misplay simply doesn't warrant it and I find nothing in the guidelines that support a gl for this. Sure, the infraction should be reported in case this player continues to misplay Rowan like this in the future, but it is highly likely that this was just a simple misplay.We will likely see an increased scrutiny by both players and judges with this widely-played card in the future. The affected player has been apologized to, and the "awareness factor" has been raised. Can we please move on?