Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

Complete Error & Misprint Card Listing

Status
Not open for further replies.
dooskoop said:
The Dark Dragonite error was available in a 1st edition and unlimited edition.
Click to expand...
Can you confirm the existance of the 1st Ed version?
I've only seen unlimited.
 
WOTC best promo Rocket's Mewtwo has a bubble of no printing about 3/8" wide. I know because I have one. Zapdos holo error - only partially holo. I have that one as well.
 
PokePop said:
Can you confirm the existance of the 1st Ed version?
I've only seen unlimited.
Click to expand...
I cant actually prove it to you... but it does exist...
I know cause i have seen them on auction on ebay... many many times... and heard about them from people....
Drew
 
procrastination_alley said:
WOTC best promo Rocket's Mewtwo has a bubble of no printing about 3/8" wide. I know because I have one.
Click to expand...
Printing blotches like this and the Charmeleon mentioned earlier don't rise to "misprints". They are just printing errors from random occurrances during the printing process.
There are exceptions, though. The Edition "d" Butterfree, for example.
But that rises about the level of random print error because there are a significant number of them and the error is interesting. A random blob of ink or lack of ink doesn't make a collectible error, in general.
 
Last edited:
dooskoop said:
The Dark Dragonite error was available in a 1st edition and unlimited edition.
Click to expand...
Some of the 1st ed Dark Dragonite Error cards on ebay says "ERROR" in title, but not really error when you click on the auction image. :tongue: Can anyone confirm it?

[*]Base Set: many cards were printed in Black & White, not color (you ain't seen nothin till you've seen a Base Set B&W Charizard!)
[/list]Also, I believe the 1st edition Jungle Electrode had the wrong artwork on the picture. It's been a while since I've seen one, but maybe somebody can fill in the blanks on this one.
Click to expand...
There is not a Rapidash in the base series... Which series would it be again? Is it corrected? Which yes, which edition it shows the error?
Can anyone send a confimation with scan or something on the black and white cards?

PokePop said:
Shining Tyranitar. "hust" instead of "just".
Click to expand...
Is this error correct? If not which edition have this error? Is the error on the bottom of the card, not on it's attack?

lunatone_solrock said:
Heehee... that is so funny.

How aout the newer cards?
Slakoth, anyone?
Click to expand...
What is the error on this? Which series/ edition? Is this correctied?

BJJ763 said:
All Blaine's Charizards had the :fighting: symbol instead of :fire:
Click to expand...
For this error? Is it on the attack or resistance?


Gardyrocks! said:
Isnt Marill an error the ones tat have no retreat
Click to expand...
Is it Sandstorm common? Which edition? It is corrected in reverse holo only, correct?

PokePop said:
However, the Vending Machoke should be called an error. It has a picture of a Machop!
Click to expand...
Did you mean the one from Japanese Vending series? Is it 2 or 3?
 
Last edited:
PokeMeBob said:
Add these to your list:
  • Base Set Rapidash HP50/50HP error (actually, the corrected version is rarer than the error)
  • Base Set: many cards were printed in Black & White, not color (you ain't seen nothin till you've seen a Base Set B&W Charizard!)
Also, I believe the 1st edition Jungle Electrode had the wrong artwork on the picture. It's been a while since I've seen one, but maybe somebody can fill in the blanks on this one.
Click to expand...
He means Vulpix, not Rapidash.
Although the Jungle Rapidash does have an uncorrected error of it's own: "Put Rapidash on the Stage 1 card"

I've never seen nor even heard of a B&W Base set. I'm sure they must be fake cards.

All 1st Ed Jungle electrodes have the BS picture.
 
Hpw about these????


PokePop said:
Shining Tyranitar. "hust" instead of "just".
Click to expand...
Is this error correct? If not which edition have this error? Is the error on the bottom of the card, not on it's attack?

lunatone_solrock said:
Heehee... that is so funny.

How aout the newer cards?
Slakoth, anyone?
Click to expand...
What is the error on this? Which series/ edition? Is this correctied?

BJJ763 said:
All Blaine's Charizards had the :fighting: symbol instead of :fire:
Click to expand...
For this error? Is it on the attack or resistance?


Gardyrocks! said:
Isnt Marill an error the ones tat have no retreat
Click to expand...
Is it Sandstorm common? Which edition? It is corrected in reverse holo only, correct?

PokePop said:
However, the Vending Machoke should be called an error. It has a picture of a Machop!
Click to expand...
Did you mean the one from Japanese Vending series? Is it 2 or 3?
 
I don't believe Shining T-tar was ever corrected, it's on all editions and is in the "flavor" text of the card.

For Blaine's Charizard, I'm not sure if this was corrected or not. It's in the attack.

Marril from Sandstorm, yes. It only has one edition. :p It was corrected, there is both a correct and error version of both the regular card AND the RH.
 
Blaine's Charizard's first attack should read

:fire: Roaring Flames Discard all :fire: Energy cards but 1 attached to Blaine’s Charizard. If all Energy cards attached to Blaine’s Charizard provide 2 :fire: Energy, discard all of them. This attack does 20 damage plus 20 more damage for each :fire: Energy discarded in this way. 20+
Click to expand...

but reads
:fire: Roaring Flames Discard all :fighting: Energy cards but 1 attached to Blaine’s Charizard. If all Energy cards attached to Blaine’s Charizard provide 2 :fire: Energy, discard all of them. This attack does 20 damage plus 20 more damage for each :fire: Energy discarded in this way. 20+
Click to expand...
 
TRJessie579 said:
Marril from Sandstorm, yes. It only has one edition. :p It was corrected, there is both a correct and error version of both the regular card AND the RH.
Click to expand...
I dont think the free retreat marril is printed in rh... if so i have never seen it... and i have seen a lot of rh marrils...
Drew
 
Ok this is terrible. I was looking at monkey cat's site and found out we can "clean up" the card and wipe off the ink of printing... then in this case, :eek:
How can we know if it is a REAL error? :nonono:
 
Last edited:
Nintendo (vintage 2004) with miscut card back, but the front is okay...

http://members.aol.com/pokemebob/Miscut.jpg

and

This is an old WotC one that I first saw around 2000. The back is okay, the front yellow border is okay, but the card face is a black and white picture of the back...

http://members.aol.com/pokemebob/BW.jpg

Technically, I guess you could classify these as misprints, not errors. Both are genuine, and both I have seen.
 
Last edited:
I have a Base Set Bulbasaur and the copyright is 1999-2000 and the other I have from the same set only the copyright to 1999. I also have two Dark Rapidash and the word "Length" is missing. I also have som Promos that don't mention WOTC.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top