Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

DeckBuilding like a CHAMPION . . .

Im like, totaly an 11 or 12, because like im that frikken good, ya know? i can make top cut like once or twice a season with the deck i found on the internet, so im awesome, aight. yall bow down

.....I'm probably a 5 or 6 at most, if that.
 
Exactly my point about try to win this thread.

Even with the luck involved it is possible to make the best list and play like a Pro(if this game would have any). Apparently you didn't read the initial and full description of a 10. Luck isn't only part of this it's part of Sports. But I bet a lot of sportswriters would rank certain teams as 10s. Like last years Patriots they just got unlucky and outplayed by the Giants.

Ness, Yamato, BigChuck, Gino, Eric Craig among others could easily be considered 10s.

Does the top rank player of the world for Chess win every tournament he attends? I highly doubt it.

Idiot...
I even said 10's only lose to other 10's.
This infact CAN be said of Chess Masters, whereas it cannot be said of Pokemon players. Chess Masters 99/100 will only lose to a player of equal or greater caliber, outside of circumstances beyond normal (such as being drunk or tired).

Again, good game.
 
I say i'm a 9-10. I don't want to be cocky here. But when i'm paired with people, they start talking with people wondering what my deck is, what the strategy, how to beat it, what to use against me. And then they get all nervous. Even the better players in my area are usually just like "Good game" and basically admit they'll lose unless I get horrible hands. (Which ha happened like 3 games this whole season) And they know coming into the tourney that they will see me in top. And if not, they ask how? And sometimes more then not that happens, but I don't really like to be cocky. So I usually stay on the DL. But whatever. You never know.
 
This thread just causes aggravation .-.

Sparta, just let everyone rate themselves tens whatever, it's not like it means anything.

We'll soon find out at states, wont we?
 
Last edited:
This thread just causes aggravation .-.

Sparta, just let everyone rate themselves tens whatever, it's not like it means anything.

We'll soon find out at sates, wont we?

What? Yout don't find posts like these amusing?

I consider myself an 8, but I've never made top cut.
 
i'm about a 6.5 with an average day (about 3-2 in a tourney.) about a 4 on a really crappy day (god, wut did i do to deserve these, o wait, nevermind...) i could be about a 8.5 on my best days (going in a 3 loss streak, then winning about 20 games straight after that.)

it just depends on how much luck i have on that day. when i have great luck, i can be one of the best. on my bad days, well, i just drop then.
 
Luck has nothing to do with this. It's mainly deckbuilding.

I see the good players from the bad , especially with Kingdra. The good players know what to hit when they use Kingdra, while the bad players struggle to hit the correct pokemon, misplay, etc.
 
when i have great luck, i can be one of the best

That's one of the biggest mistakes players make; thinking that getting lucky a few times makes them a good player. Anybody can take a donk deck and end up in tops (I took 2nd in a tournament with straight donk Machamp). What the OP of the thread seems to be trying to convey, is that a good/great player builds and runs consistent decks that rely on as little luck as possible while utilizing his/her ability to read the playfield, know the options that his opponent's deck allows, and how to overcome the tricks that the opposing deck can turn.

tl;dr - Having luck doesn't make you "one of the best".
 
I'll rank myself as about an eight (8). I autowin against most beginner players and younger players, and I almost never take lists from someone else; I always build my own deck to adhere to my personal playing style, and refine it based on how well it does against the skilled opponents at my league.
 
I win this thread. WHY???????? Because I declare myself some number. But not just any number, I declare myself whatever number it is that would make myself a pokemon trading card game deck builder master. Therefore I win this thread.

BTW: my number is not a 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10.

MWhahahahahahahahahhhhhhhh!!!!!!
 
I think I would be 3.5 ish. Just because. This is not a poll.

I just don't invest that much time in the cards anymore. :)
 
I need to level up to something like level 3 or something. Sparta helped me get to level 2, but 3 sounds like a challenge for me. I bet people who build decks such as ArmoredMewtwo, or whoever else who claim to be 8+ can make sure I reach my goal.
 
I need to level up to something like level 3 or something. Sparta helped me get to level 2, but 3 sounds like a challenge for me. I bet people who build decks such as ArmoredMewtwo, or whoever else who claim to be 8+ can make sure I reach my goal.

Man Armored Mewtwo's Disruptive King Deck (http://pokegym.net/forums/showthread.php?t=92785) is a surefire way to level up to level 3 or 4. Just remember that stage two decks don't need stage 1s to evolve.
 
I need to level up to something like level 3 or something. Sparta helped me get to level 2, but 3 sounds like a challenge for me. I bet people who build decks such as ArmoredMewtwo, or whoever else who claim to be 8+ can make sure I reach my goal.

The best way to get to level 3 is to go on a quest to reach level 3.
Ash went on such a quest at the age of 10, wandering around the world with nothing but a backpack.

Just remember, gotta catch em all.

Man Armored Mewtwo's Disruptive King Deck (http://pokegym.net/forums/showthread.php?t=92785) is a surefire way to level up to level 3 or 4. Just remember that stage two decks don't need stage 1s to evolve.

loltrolled.
 
. . . Troll. Take one of my worst deck ideas and turn it against me.

There's a place for people whom have to stroke their egos that way.

Will you stop talking about my cat already?
UGH.

Ok, on a serious note, the best way to become a better player is through experience and analysis. You look at the best decks, you investigate what makes them the best, then you do the same with other formats. What did they have in common, why was this the, which characteristics made it better than other decks at the time. As you learn what makes these decks better than the rest, you can try implementing that into your decks, then you see what the results were. You continue doing this until you're hypothesis is proven correct or incorrect, at which point you continue looking forward and investigating.

In short, the scientific method, if used correctly, can be used to improve yourself.

But above all else, LISTEN. If a player like Ryan Vergel comes and tells you to do one thing, and some random tells you to do another, you always take into account what the more experienced player says first. Don't just take their word for it though, ask, investigate, find out WHY you should make those changes. In short, TEST TEST TEST.

Hope this helped.
 
Hey, just because he hasn't made top cut doesn't mean that he isn't a skilled player.

How can someone be an "8" if they've never made top cut.

It's frustrating seeing users like this who think that because they can make up 20 decklists, that their lists are gold. Anyone can type up a decklist; that doesn't make you a great deckbuilder.

A great deckbuilder makes a deck and beats the metagame. My younger brother makes decks constantly. That doesn't make him good, it means he has a good imagination. Yeah, you can see what works well together. It doesn't mean that you know how to use it or how to beat players who put effort into a worthwhile deck. I see a LOT of posters/spammers that have close to an average 50 posts/day like Bippa (threads about why people aren't using 50hp pichu to get energy out of the discard, telling people how to make decks from cards that are 1-2 sets yet released, etc) and ArmoredMewtwo (who knows how many zero-synergy decklists) who come up with all of these decks that are half-put together, then think they are great players.
 
Back
Top