Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

Destiny and Flying Eevol, what are they?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Pokemon 21
3 Lickitung D
3 Ray EX D
2 Skarmory EX
3 Mew EX
3 Stantler
1 Latios EX D
1 Castform

Trainers 25
4 Trans
4 Mentor
1 Researchers
4 ER2
4 Reversal
4 Cessation Crystal
1 Scienctist
1 Adventuere
1 Farmer
1 Lass

Energy
4 Lighting
4 Psychic
4 D Rainbow
2 Metal

Thats a decent list...Better than the one posted b4
Cursed Stone?
Why C. Crystal? It can only be attached to Lickitung, Stantler and Castform, and then Skarmorys Body don't work.. o_O
Only 1 Adventure?
I don't know anything about this deck, but I think it's a bad list..
Here's MO:

Pokemon: 15

4 Mew ex
2 Lickitung d'
2 Stantler
2 Rayquaza ex
2 Skarmory ex
1 Latios ex d'
2 Castform

Trainers: 33

4 Holon Transceiver
4 Holon Mentor
2 Resaercher
2 Adventure
1 Farmer
1 Lass
4 ER2
4 Reversal
2 Castaway
1 Scott
2 Cessation Crystal
3 Cursed Stone
2 Battle Frontier
1 Space Center

Energies: 12

4 Lightning
4 Psychic
2 Multi
2 Metal

JMO though.
 
Last edited:
no castaway???

er2???
reversal??? (cant you already hit the bench?)
Battle frontiers???
latias d???
metal energy???
lass???

man you guys are WAYYYY off.

jimmy
 
yeah we are pathetic when all of the decks i have seen, that focused on disruption, always included as many er2s and reversals as physically possible. not to mention would any of you tell us we were right or would this just be, the closer we get the futher away you say we are? either case if none of the extravigant ideas, maybe off the wall sounds better, we have suggested are not it than thats all that means is that this deck is nothing special and is just a different color of something that already exists.
besides from what i have tested other than ,my supposed, questionable trainer line this deck is easier to play around than flaridos.
 
fair enough, but then why dont you end this topic then, being you are not willing to talk about the deck and if anyone else, who didnt make the deck, does you will bash on them.
 
fair enough, but then why dont you end this topic then, being you are not willing to talk about the deck and if anyone else, who didnt make the deck, does you will bash on them.

nah, you're just trying too hard to find the list. What's wrong with your list? Why exactly do you HAVE to know the list?
 
why does everyone on here just keep this going? i mean nothing is being accomplished, so if you want to hear it i give up on trying to find the list, which i wasnt actually doing. i figured i may as well try to see if i was any where close. the lists after was my improvements to my lists. thats all this deck is, is taking a super stantler deck and taking it to its core then adding in non evolution substitutes. then find ways to reduce your pokemon numbers in order to increase consistancy and disabling tools. it boils down to a deck that focuses on its tools to gain an advantage. from my studies the deck seems to just tip over an opponent trapping them in place and begin to extend this reach until your opponent stops moving all together. its a valid technique however playing only basics prevents you from using any form of energy acceleration, which means if a majority decks get set up you have already lost. either case i am trying to improve this flaw, the reasoning for including reversal is to push my opponent off balance when i need it forced.
 
^Sounds about right.. xD (Stantler, anyone?)

Some people consider Super Stantler a good deck, so, while Destiny could run Stantler, it will also have another under-rated card in the deck. What, I have no idea, but there must be a card everyone has been over-looking.
 
rofl
dont compare this deck to "super stantler"
"super stantler" is a bad deck that muk man overhypes because he made it

stantler has better uses, and this is one of them

this deck is a work of art, created and perfected by some of the best deck builders in the world (Jimmy, Adam etc.), so just appreciate how this deck works and dominates the format because none of you will come close to getting the list, let alone knowing how to play it properly, until Jimmy or anyone else who knows it reveals it.
 
yo celini
i dont care what these silly people say, ur list looks solid
try it out, it might even work better for you than their list
plus, it gives you the opportunity to be original:thumb:
 
These guys are pathetic...

I'm Pathetic because I posted a list? I just wanted to see if I came close. I'm not even going to attempt this deck, because I think that the deck, being known, its near as good as it would be with the Surprise Factor. I am in NO way pathetic for posting that list. I made that in 2 Min, with only previous knowladge of seeing Soles play it, so why dont you STFU?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top