Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

Lucario/Machamp = MARIO.dec .. join us...

Status
Not open for further replies.
actually, this fares well against flygon ex d... At least every time I've went against it. Only problem is OHKO of Lucario, but thas why I'm considering adding NRG root to the list. Against Destiny, this is about a 50/50, I played one of the first players of Destiny, and I'm 3-3 against it, so it does so so
Infernape is yet to be tested tho... :nonono:
 
Politoed EX said:
actually, this fares well against flygon ex d... At least every time I've went against it. Only problem is OHKO of Lucario, but thas why I'm considering adding NRG root to the list. Against Destiny, this is about a 50/50, I played one of the first players of Destiny, and I'm 3-3 against it, so it does so so
Infernape is yet to be tested tho... :nonono:
Click to expand...

i wanna play against this before our battle road....ok
:thumb:
 
This deck pwns the Ape more or less 65-70% of the time.
It just rushes through them so fast and they usually can't OHKO the Lucario due to DRE. BUT Infernape is pretty fast at recovering.
 
Chromecatz said:
So how does this do vs destiny and infernape and flygon?
Click to expand...

I already put in the report. This deck has a great chance vs Flygon EX, and also Infernape. It's super-quick, which hurts Stage 2 decks. Vs Destiny, this deck should do very well, as Lickitung and Stantler are weak, Mew is fragile, and no Poke-Powers means Rayquaza and Cursed Stone have little to go on.

On the deck name, Chuck Norris is OK, but seeing that "Lucario" sounds Spanish, and Machamp does "Revenge" maybe we should call the deck "Scarface." heh
 
Chuck Norris is the secret name of the deck :p

Hmmm... Anbuis... MaCario... Champion... Vengeance... man, I stink at names >_>

Peace...
 
Machamp DP's weakness sets him apart from anything non-DP, so golem probably wouldn't be as good. As for the name, Scarface.dec>ChuckNorris.dec. It annoys me so much that people are obsessed with Chuck. He's such a loser.
 
What about your match-up vs. Shifttry ex Decks?

Lets say their mainlines are like this:

4 Lickitung
4-3-3-1 Shiftry ex (3 CG /1 PK)
2-2 Banette (1 ex and 1 safeguard)

Is it around 50-50 or in favour of scarface?
 
Rayquaza14 said:
What about your match-up vs. Shifttry ex Decks?

Lets say their mainlines are like this:

4 Lickitung
4-3-3-1 Shiftry ex (3 CG /1 PK)
2-2 Banette (1 ex and 1 safeguard)

Is it around 50-50 or in favour of scarface?
Click to expand...

U mean CHuck Norris.dec? I dont know any deck by the name of Scarface...
Yeah, this easily beats shifty ex decks, especially the one listed above...
Machop or Riolu can T1 the Lickitung, and Machamp/Lucario can easily stop shiftry.
Only problem is that one Banette... but Crystal Shard + 2 Plus Powers on Machamps Revenge attack after the Ban KOs something gets rid of it, and than its easy sailing...

thethirdkelly1... Do NOT diss Chuck Norris...
 
Or Al Roker.dec

:eek::eek: Seriously, it is now, Al Roker.dec if we r not callin it Chuck Norris.dec

AL ROKER FTW FTW FTW!!!!!!!!!!!! :biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::thumb::thumb:

if not al roker.dec, then Pachino.dec :wink:
 
Thats gotta be a catch-phrase that every player of Scarface,dec uses every match when they play Rare Candy to a Machamp DP, Lay an NRG down and do 70+.... SURPRISE!!!!

we need to form a Team Scarface

for real
 
Politoed EX said:
Thats gotta be a catch-phrase that every player of Scarface,dec uses every match when they play Rare Candy to a Machamp DP, Lay an NRG down and do 70+.... SURPRISE!!!!

we need to form a Team Scarface

for real
Click to expand...

"I'm not only a member, I'm also the President (el Presidente)!"

DEFINITELY a cool catchphrase... "say hello to my LEE-tle fren'!"

As for Banette, AGAIN, remember you will also have Machamp PK which has Brick Smash (NO RESISTANCE), and Lucario, which can hit for 30 No Resistance, so versus Banette, no Shard is necessary.

In the next format, no Metanite, and no Banette EX.

I've updated the front page with a better list.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top