Now I say while they are complaining there are players that win their national (some as competitive as Canada), they dont get the travel award and they have to pay much more money and make more financial efforts because wages are lower in their country.
I pulled up some attendance numbers for you to show that Canada has as many / more players than other countries that have 2 trips. There are other countries that have similar numbers that also get 1 trip (mexico / Australia now as well) but there aren't any nationals that have more players and no trips.
Are there sales numbers released for pokemon based on regions? I wouldn't be surprised if Canada was in the top 5 markets.
The main reason a lot of players aren't happy about this is because now there is little reason for us to travel to Nationals unless you live in Ontario or Quebec. You already get more bang for your buck at worlds, and with single elimination grinders you'll have to win less games to earn your invite there anyways. (This will remain true even after World's leaves Canada...It's actually cheaper to fly to Hawaii than Toronto most times)
The majority of competitive Alberta players won't be going to nationals this year....I think there might be 5 or 6 going?
Figure out the player per square kilometre for both Mexico and Canada and then tell me how that is even remotely a fair comparison. If our player based lived in even remotely the same proximity to each other as Mexicans do, I would bet that we would outdraw Mexican Nationals by a TON every year. (For comparison's sake, BC/Alberta/Saskatchewan alone are larger than Mexico.)
Really, there is no way to fairly compare Canada to any other country in the world simply because of the ridiculous amount of land mass we have between the groups of players.
Pablo, what was the attendance / prizes for the last couple years in Mexico?
Anyways, my point was precisely that, attendance is NOT a good factor to compare how 'hard' a Nationals is, I would say that would depend on quality > quantity of players, and before Chase Maloney (a senior) Canada hasn't had any impressive or high end name players at Worlds other than Sebastian Crema. Mexico hasn't had many either (I'm not one anymore even though I almost won Worlds and we recently had a Top 4 in Masters in 2011, Top 16 in Hawaii but that's it). I was never the one to argue Mexico is more fierce than Canada, I argued that Canada is NOT the second most fierce behind USA, and throwing random attendance and population stats will not change that. Germany has a higher attendance than both our countries and yet doesn't have one reputable name.
Just saying we have had Jacob Lesage win worlds alrhough he was a senior. We have also had Curtis Lion top 8 worlds and make cut multiple times. We have also had Matt Koo make cut ar worlds many times along woth many other players.
You're just flat out wrong that we have it cheaper and have to travel less than all other countries to get to Worlds this year. Than any non-North American country, sure. Just like every other year. But as of right now, a round trip ticket from Miami to Vancouver (pretty much as far away as you can possibly get that's within the continental USA) is $14 more than a round trip ticket from Toronto to Vancouver, so it follows that it's cheaper for almost the entire US.
As for distance, approximately 75% of the US and close to a third of Mexico are closer to Vancouver than Toronto is. Proof here. So yeah.
And I can name Mexico players as well that have made cut, myself included.
Anyways, my point was precisely that, attendance is NOT a good factor to compare how 'hard' a Nationals is, I would say that would depend on quality > quantity of players, and before Chase Maloney (a senior) Canada hasn't had any impressive or high end name players at Worlds other than Sebastian Crema. Mexico hasn't had many either (I'm not one anymore even though I almost won Worlds and we recently had a Top 4 in Masters in 2011, Top 16 in Hawaii but that's it). I was never the one to argue Mexico is more fierce than Canada, I argued that Canada is NOT the second most fierce behind USA, and throwing random attendance and population stats will not change that. Germany has a higher attendance than both our countries and yet doesn't have one reputable name.
Ouch...Canada has no more notable players beside Chase and Sebastian ?
This is my 4th year in a row qualifying for the world championships in 5 years of playing, t32 and t8
Gordon Coates top 16...does consistently well (won his provincials championships like 5 years in a row)
Bidier Jing - Grinds in whenever he tries
Matthew Koo - Top 16 in his first worlds, top 32 x2
Jacob Lesage - the only player I believe to win every single tournament in a season (including worlds)
Not to mention every time we attend a tournament(States or Regionals) in the US there is atleast a Canadian in top 4.
I would argue the quality of players in Canada present day is at an all time high, for example I remember back in September I attended a battle road and it had 16 players. out of the 16 - 12 had distinct accomplishments...including a regional champion, 6 worlds competitors, a top 8 at worlds, a world champion etc.
Im not trying to cause any country hate or put targets on our back but I think we can agree that the quality of players (Canada included) has been exponential.
Who are you again?
Gordon Coates is definitely someone I forgot. Bidier Jing will always be notable for Golem/Exploud, Top 16 and Top 32 doesn't make you 'notable' otherwise every country is notable at this point after 9 World Championships, and finally, Jacob Lesage won every tournament in a season, including Worlds, IN SENIORS. Curran Hill did it too in 2005 I believe, and where is Jacob now in Masters?
I'm sure Canada has quality players, but I will still argue it is far from the 2nd best country after the U.S.
Bidier Jing will always be notable for Golem/Exploud
This post is made with extreme ignorance to the relative purchasing power parity in both countries. It is typical of a biased Canadian/American mentality that underestimates how well off Canada/America is compared to some of the other countries in the world. Mexican players on average will spend a much higher percentage of their income on a trip to Vancouver compared to Canadian players.
Figure out the player per square kilometre for both Mexico and Canada and then tell me how that is even remotely a fair comparison. If our player based lived in even remotely the same proximity to each other as Mexicans do, I would bet that we would outdraw Mexican Nationals by a TON every year. (For comparison's sake, BC/Alberta/Saskatchewan alone are larger than Mexico.)
Sorry, I quoted the wrong post. This is the post that demonstrates ignorance.
It is not only the land area of a country that matters. It is the proximity to a commercial airport and availability of transportation to that airport that matters.