Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

Sablelock w/ Blaziken for states!

Yes, I realized that.

I will try taking out the 3rd Collector, just to see if it makes a huge difference.

Thanks for your help man!
 
I say drop Blaziken in favor of consistency. Trust me, I have tested Sablelock for a while, and what the deck needs, is pure consistency. Drop the smeargle for a Sableye as well.
 
^
Thanks for the help man.

I actually really like Blaze in here. I used to play plain Sablelock with extra consistency but my main issue was damage output - the decks I played could do better against me because once my Krow and Chomps were gone I was messed up.

I forgot to edit the first page - I have 4 Sableye, no Smeargle.
 
You DEFINITELY need a heavy hitter, whether it's BDK or Blaziken or both is up to you. I could not get it to work without the heavy hitter.

I think the second Bat is a stronger play than the VS seeker imo. Third Collector is a gray area for me.
 
@Kayle: Thanks again for your help bro.

I used to play Sablelock with BDK. It went undefeated at league during the 3 weeks I played it there, which was a good sign I guess. However, I had a constant problem vs. tank decks - I needed another heavy hitter. Also, like I said, once my BDK and Chomps were gone I had to use Krow G alone (which I don't play in this version).

I'll probably remove the 3rd Collector for a VS Seeker,
 
You should have seen me WITHOUT BDK. Early disruption check, lategame cleanup... total fail
 
^
Yeah, that would happen.

I'm currently undecided on this or my regular Sablelock deck. I mean, this has more lategame power, but my other (BDK included) has those 4 extra spaces for consistency techs.
 
Would you consider adding a premier ball to your list. I would take put one sp radar. The pro of using premier is to get back an x from you discard at the cost of being able to search for the trainer with Cyrus. Just my 2 cents.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top