Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

The new blaziken ex feel its power

Status
Not open for further replies.
pokemon
5 torichics
3 blaziken fire starter
2 blaziken ex
4 skittys
3 delecattys energy draw
3 combustions


energies
14 fire
4 boost


trainers



4 warp points
3 jugglers
3 oaks reseach
3 elms training method
3 prof brich
2 rare candies
2 t.v. reporters

Okay, here is what I'd do.

First off, for the Pokemon, drop 1 Torchic so it's legal. :p Drop the Delcatty/Skitty line down to a 2/2 line. You're really not gonna need more than one out, so don't over kill it. Add in a 2/1/2 line of Mareep/Flaaffy/Ampharos (flame me for this, I don't care I'll explain WHY you should put it in in a moment) and 4 Dunsparce.

I'm just going to fix the rest and give explanations for the changes at the bottom... instead of saying what I'm taking out and putting in.

Pokemon: 25

4 Dunsparce
4 Torchic (Dragon)
3 Combusken
5 Blaziken ( 3 firestarter and 2 ex)
2 Skitty (Sandstorm)
2 Delcatty (Energy Draw)
2 Mareep (Dragon)
1 Flaaffy (Aquapolis Energy retrieval thing)
2 Ampharos (expedition)

Trainers: 18

4 Oracle
4 Rare Candy
4 Professor Oaks Research
4 Tv Reporter
1 Warp Point
1 Town Volunteers

Energy: 17

14 Fire
3 Boost

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Now to explain it. The Ampharos line, is MUCH smoother than scrambling for switch every turn to get multiple Blaziken Ex up. Instead, this way you need 2 Fire starter blaziken and 1 Ampharos and 1 Blaziken ex. Simply discard the 2 energy for 100 damage and then fire starter them back, energy connect up and 100 more. No waiting, it makes it more smooth and consistent... with switch you don't always have it garaunteed, with Ampharos, you KNOW every turn you can do 100 damage. I'd feel much safer having a for sure damage locked in like that, than having to rely on me always having something in my hand to rotate through the Blazikens.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Now, as to you saying Bar ain't good. Umm play against it, I dare you. All I'm gonna say.

To Kyogre, thank you so much for including me on that saying I go around all the time in other people's threads bringing up Bar, when I haven't done that at all. Also, thank you for taking the time to get my name right and bringing it to my attention it's changed to JohnYoung06. I don't claim Bar to be THE best or unbeatable, I do think it's rather good, but I'm not constantly bringing it up in every single topic I post in, nor is Venusaur.
 
YoungJohn06 said:
To Kyogre, thank you so much for including me on that saying I go around all the time in other people's threads bringing up Bar, when I haven't done that at all. Also, thank you for taking the time to get my name right and bringing it to my attention it's changed to JohnYoung06. I don't claim Bar to be THE best or unbeatable, I do think it's rather good, but I'm not constantly bringing it up in every single topic I post in, nor is Venusaur.


Your right, I'm sorry for including you and Venusaur in my post. I was just mad at Mudkip and I seemed to group you guys together. I mean what mudkip said was pretty rude. But again I'm sorry, about messing up your name. It was late and I guess I was dyslexic for a min. ;)
 
me lol, ya it was really stupid for me to say that, I'm sorry, I won't go on ranting about BAR and Niniken, please forgive me.
 
what is a Niniken deck because this is the first time I have heard it but I've seen a few people talk about it on the threads. Thank You.
 
Thanks Levi, but how come not a lot of people talk about Blaze/ Eggs no more because I thought it is still a good deck. Levi, u can show me at the City Championship on Feb. 7 or can't you show me it now depends if u want to. Ok, Thank U especially Levi

P.S. Is Niniken a good deck? Thanks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top