Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

Third and Final Presidential Debate

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yah, Bill O'Rielly is an independent the way Obama is an Arab. No offense Rew, but you obviously aren't looking hard enough.

Wait, Obama is an Arab, right?
 
If you have more drilling, then we need more people to do the drilling. I'm sure people work in the oil business.

Now, we can predict what is going to happen to the mother, because of our medical advances, we are pretty accurate on our guessing, I'm sure we could figure things like that out.

6 Years of Mayor+2 Years on Oil and Gas Conservaton Commision+2 Years Governor
4 Years State Senete+3 Years US Senate

Now what I've seen from Fox, I'm not refering to them as to who won, I'm refering to them as the first poll to be posted. Okay, I've only seen two shows on Fox: Bill O'Rielly and Greta V. (something). I haven't seen shows on CBS and NBC that aren't biased. Bill O'Rielly is an independent, meaning he isn't leaning twards Obama or McCain. Maybe I haven't seen the biased things, I'm sorry that I said they are fair, but the things I have seen are.
There's many other way to create more jobs. We do not have to limit it to drilling.

Yes, medical advances are making things more accurate but it still is not completely 100%. What do we do for those that are victims to probability?

Bill O'Rielly is an independant!? I Just LOL'd right there. He may be registered as an independent and "think" like one but he is so far leaning to the right it is ridiculous.
 
Bill O'Reilly said:
I'm not a political guy in the sense that I embrace an ideology. To this day I'm an independent thinker, an independent voter, I'm a registered independent ... there are certain fundamental things that this country was founded upon that I respect and don't want changed. That separates me from the secularists who want a complete overhaul of how the country is run.

Quote fromt he man himself. You're welcome.

EDIT:

But our medical advances are close enough. I didn't say that they are 100%, but they are something to trust.
There are many ways to create jobs, but I was saying that is one of them.
 
spreading the wealth isnt even close to communism. after taxes someone making $300k a year will still end up with more money than someone making $200k.
 
spreading the wealth isnt even close to communism. after taxes someone making $300k a year will still end up with more money than someone making $200k.

However, people that are making that money are now losing it to the poor. Poor in our terms means people who didn't work hard for their money. Rich is people who have money either by working at it, being smart and people who got lucky (gambling, lottery, betting). Lets take this into a 10 year old perspective:

Mommy gives each of her 3 children 5 dollars.
Timmy picked his glass off the table.
Tommy fixed his bed.
Andrew did the dishes, washed the counters, cleaned his room and washed the dog.
 
However, people that are making that money are now losing it to the poor. Poor in our terms means people who didn't work hard for their money. Rich is people who have money either by working at it, being smart and people who got lucky (gambling, lottery, betting). Lets take this into a 10 year old perspective:

Mommy gives each of her 3 children 5 dollars.
Timmy picked his glass off the table.
Tommy fixed his bed.
Andrew did the dishes, washed the counters, cleaned his room and washed the dog.

What? .
 
Wow, Robbie. All of your posts are ridiculous.
First of all, Fox News is easily the worst station to get information from. It is so obviously biased towards conservatives it's insane. Sure, there are stations that lean left but none nearly as biased as Fox (CNN does get close, I'll admit that). ALL networks interview and side with or attack both sides. Just because you're limited only to Fox News (it seems) doesn't mean you can say the others are bad. EVEN so, Fox has Obama winning the debate 64% to 36%, so I don't know where you got your statistics.
Second, you cannot tell me that people are poor only because they don't work hard. There are as many people in this country who work multiple jobs and take care of families as people who live on welfare checks. Your blanket statement is just so invalid I can hardly believe it was said.
Next, you have no basis saying that Palin is more experienced than Obama. You gave some simple math for unequal positions and just leave it. Are you trying to tell me that the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission is a position that means anything in Washington? Do you think that a position of Mayor of a small town is better than actual work in the Senate. Palin admitted during the VP debates that she was an "outsider" to Washington, but yet you're still saying she's more experienced?
Lastly, I don't care that you quoted Bill O'Reilly saying he's independent. I can say that I'm from Alaska and that I think that Sarah Palin is the greatest vice presidential candidate in the history of the United States but that doesn't mean its true.

I've got more to say, but I can barely stand to type it. So it will be saved for a later date.
 
Ryan, he's saying that it's their own fault that they're poor, yet under a liberal government they get the same benefits.
 
Well, I haven't watched it yet, but who ever wins I'll support them I guess, both seem bad in some ways, eh I prefer Mitt Romney any day.
 
Anyone left wondering why the constitution is so painfully vague?

So that the laws could be changed over time, and the country could evolve, without overhauling the government.

The poor--it's true some people don't work for their money, but most do. I'm studying to become a high school teacher. I'm gonna get paid 30-35 thousand yearly.

Anyone who says teaching is easy has never tried it. I have, and it's tough. Teachers get a few benefits mind you, but ion the end that sort of pay is ridiculous for the work put into the job.

I have friends who have the collectors calling every other night, and their parents work ridiculous shifts. If Joe is making 300 thousand a year to my 30 thousand, he's not gonna miss the money too much. He's doing just fine. He may not get that Mercedes this year, but I don't think he needs it that badly.

Abortion--What about people who are not financially able to raise a child? Those who are victim to raep? Maybe Joe and Suzie had a few too many and did something they shouldn't have, yes, and maybe they should be responsible, but maybe Joe and Suzie wouldn't make very good parents. And don't even start on it being murder. That's A MATTER OF OPINION. If you think it's murder, NO ONE'S MAKING YOU HAVE AN ABORTION. Keep your opinion to yourself and let other people do what THEY think is right. It's none of your business.

Furthermore, I'm not a fan of McCain's character anymore. At this point he's just a sellout.

Feel free to misquote me, split hairs, whatever.
 
Here are the current resullts from CNN's poll online:

Sen. John McCain 17% 43224
Sen. Barack Obama 79% 194403
No clear winner 4% 9768
Total Votes: 247395

That is a huge difference between the other two debates.
 
Well, McCain often talks about nuclear power, and in this debate I believe he said he wants to see 43 new nuclear power plants which I find to be very risky and not the way to energy independence. We need to find new sources of energy, and that is something John McCain has voted against time after time.

Tjernobyl anyone?? (or is it Chernobyl in English?)
 
Last edited:
People act like because you make $30k vs. $300k a year means you don't work hard for the money.

Think again.

I bet I worked harder at Publix earning $8/hour than some of these corrupt CEO's. Actually I take that back, I'm POSITIVE that I worked harder than some of those fools.

Oh and I loved McCain's rhetoric last night.

"You're rich! Now the commies want to come and take your money away!"

Hey McCain...I'm not rich and neither is 90% of America. If you want to get elected maybe you should've been talking to us poor folk, not the rich who were too busy eating their Gray Poupon and scheduling Sunday's tee time last night.
 
My only job while going to school paid me $7.50 an hour and I couldn't work more than 15 hours a week for fairness to all the other employees.

I can't say that most poor people work for their money. I can't say that most poor people don't work for their money. I've seen many cases of both.

All I know is that there are human beings that need stuff like food and medicine, and a house of their head and they can't always afford the high hospital bills or the high drug bills. They need help, and the help has to come from somewhere.
 
Yea, minimum wage is like $6.15 or something I think. It's less if you make tips.

I started out at $7.00 but after 2 years of working I finally got a pay raise of a dollar =\

Now I have a work study job that pays me $7.50 to cut trees but I have a work limit of only 10 hours per week. Woo!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top