Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

TurnCruel - My Results.

Lanturn can actually do a lot of damage for 3 energy, especially against lightning-weak stuff such as Empoleon, Kingdra, Kyogre etc.. One Multi and 2 water does 90, for example, which should be enough to net a KO if the Pokemon has been softened up previously by the Lanturn/Tentacruel spread.
 
Are you supposed to spam Absols if they do get a Claydol then? I don't understand how Absol can be so disruptive if they can just replace what you discard by drawing more. Sure, there's the off chance you'll hit Bebe's or Claydol, but more often than not you won't, which leaves you up a creek with low HP and low damage output.
 
Its about hoitting early,its not like you dont setup. Yea the deck has low damage output,but Lanturn Lightning can do as much damage as if u put Water on it,especially to Kingdra and Empoleon.

Its all about placing damage and picking what to hit, the reason why I use Azleaf,so that moving all that energy means something,60 to anything on the field can be big even if it dosent produce OHKO, the deck isnt about OHKing,its about producing OHKos with little resources.

Ask anyone who has played me on redshark with this deck, I can show u it works.
 
I don't like the auto-loss against Leafeon or Eeveelutions in general. The only Pokémon that can hurt Leafeon are lightning Lanturn and Azelf Lv.X, both don't get even close to a OHKO. Energy manipulation doesn't hurt Leafeon and Tentacruel's attack even helps the deck - I don't see any chance to beat it except for donking. If they play Unown G, even Azelf can't do much.

We tested that matchup a few hours ago and... yeah, Eevees got a pretty bad start with no Leafeon for several turns but TurnCruel still didn't get a chance.
 
proplay:but cruel isnt even the main attacker.but Luxray isnt in Halibeks favor,I stated that earlier.

Auto Loss?? I dont know many Lutions decks with Unown G, I played Halibek vs Magleaf,and it won,even tho it was close. It aint even close to a auto loss,Im sure of that Shadow.
 
I would love to see a list and some more playtesting results posted before we start getting into such matchup speculations.
 
~`Flygon`~ said:
proplay:but cruel isnt even the main attacker.but Luxray isnt in Halibeks favor,I stated that earlier.

Auto Loss?? I dont know many Lutions decks with Unown G, I played Halibek vs Magleaf,and it won,even tho it was close. It aint even close to a auto loss,Im sure of that Shadow.
Click to expand...
What is Halibek?

Seriously.
 
well lantrurn LA o ya thats great a card because it can confuse you... o wait free retreat with lux there goes that condition
and the pk lanturn still cant one hit a lux even if you discard. and yes you can move around my energys do it allllll you want from one luxio or ray to the other. and if i dont approve of your choice i have 4 energy switches as will most decks this format. also flygon you like myself post on her alot and i usually favor your ideas but honestly why this one?
 
~`Flygon`~ said:
Auto Loss?? I dont know many Lutions decks with Unown G, I played Halibek vs Magleaf,and it won,even tho it was close. It aint even close to a auto loss,Im sure of that Shadow.
Click to expand...
Even without Unown G - Azelf does 60-80 one time and will most likely be knocked out after that.

Magleaf isn't pure Eeveelutions or even Leaftile - Magmortar has water weakness, it needs lots of energy attached to itself and can't be healed by Dawn Stadium, making it an easy target to paralyze with Tentacruel.

I still can't see the deck winning against Leafeon, which has -20 resistance, heal power with Dawn Stadium (yes it heals Cruel too, but for Leafeon this removed damage makes a much bigger difference), benefits from your energy manipulation and sooner or later OHKOs everything in TurnCruel without problems.

However, Kingdra also has big problems with Leafeon and is still considered as top tier deck for Battle Roads. At least, TurnCruel has a few more options to react, even if most of them usually aren't very effective.
 
Proplay:Im not understanding what your talking about all with the confusing and retreating,Im lost on that.This idea works,if you are just looking at cards,then you can be like meh,but Im sitting here testing the idea and see how to play the deck,its a idea that works,but Im trying something that is challeging and isnt as simple as "Attach 1,I do Dragon Pump and discard 2" or "Level Up Mesprit,discard all to do 200",Im trying something that takes more in depth thought to use. Thats why Im trying this deck.

But it wont be alot of pure Eeveelutions decks,even now it needs support to be good,Magleaf has the one of the best chances during the field,thats why I tried that. If you have a another deck,PM me and Ill test against that.
60-80 and then saying it would get koed,fine,but what if it dosent??Alot of the time it dosent,and placing damage on more than 2 pokemon.

The strategy of the deck is to control energy,its not about OHKOing anything,its about spreading and control the field. Its a low damage output deck,but its speedy.
 
proplay010 said:
well lantrurn LA o ya thats great a card because it can confuse you... o wait free retreat with lux there goes that condition
and the pk lanturn still cant one hit a lux even if you discard. and yes you can move around my energys do it allllll you want from one luxio or ray to the other. and if i dont approve of your choice i have 4 energy switches as will most decks this format. also flygon you like myself post on her alot and i usually favor your ideas but honestly why this one?
Click to expand...

your grammer sucks i can hardly make sense of it, i cant spell but... omg

as stated before, electric tanturn can do a straight 90 for 3. bench a luxray, move 2 energy from your discard to him for free, and them squat him later. its a stage on with no energy that im losing to splat your main attacker, sounds in my favour as a turncruek player.

have you considered a cress LVX as a tech in this deck? the damage counter manipulation could be very favourable.
 
Flygon and I both playtested AMU vs his Lanturn.

I think we both can agree it was a silly game, we both had crud setups, but his deck did prevail.
I was using AMU!
 
proplay010 said:
My grammar is not bad at all, but at five in the morning it might be a tad off. Flygon ill send you a deck
Click to expand...

Oh really? I thought 'I'll' was capitalized and had an apostrophe.

I think you're looking at the wrong Lanturn anyway, that one is barely, if ever used.
 
Ok Mr. Spell check and so your telling me the main attacker is the other lanturn which there are only 2 of because earlier flygon said tentacruel wasnt the main attacker.
 
There are two LA Lanturn. Check the LA Lanturn that's L type. Energy Split can spread for 30 on everyone with any energy attached, and do 90 for 3 energy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top