@SMP88-
Your posting history is really interesting. With your last post, I feel that your needing to be todays lynch option. Here is why:
In post #318- "No reason to reveal"
Post # 322- "Don't reveal and wait, scummy"
Post- #327- interesting wording here
meanwhile- your voting on Vblakes and holding it--
post #332- still some interesting wording
Why so many circular questions? Is it because asking carefully worded questions can entrap a player by way of confusion?
some time goes by, plenty of things going on between AT and Vegi...........
Post #switch vote from Vblakes onto Vegi..........
post#583- looking townie here, but still holding vote onto Vegi because Vegi has the most votes
post #607- You were on AT's case just a little, then defend AT against Vegi
Post #666- interesting again, seems to me that your looking to redirect any defense in favor of Vegi
POst #671- two people claim knowing Vegi can't be making up something out of thin air, still holding vote on Vegi- time wise, getting a solid lynch on Vegi is running short, so your looking as if your trying to keep a solid lynch onto Vegi
post#673 and 675- trying to discredit anything that is possible, "cornering" peoples thoughts into agreeing with you
post #685- stuck to your vote after another discrediting type of comment
now, hold on- post #720 is interesting-
Here you are switching your vote again............
so, your seeing that the Vegi lynch is not going to happen, so right back onto Vblakes
post #767- "lets lynch" sort of posting reminder, looking townie
Day 2:
post #820- "we have nothing to go on"- wait, didn't you say on day 1 that we need to look more into the KoTRT? You should have continued with that part from the last day, right? Oh, wait, I do not thik you care who gets lynched........... and suddenly onto this Pokemon hunt, oh yet again back onto Vblakes
Post #829- of course it does not matter names/roles, alignment matters more- so, you made this post why? Names make some sort of a connection at times. Most of the time from my own experiance and what I have seen- wolves do not have names that can easily be connected. Seems fishy to me as to why you said this in the first place. Sort of open ended question as it does have people's line of thinking into things that can easily be swayed.
post #831- you vote Scorri, discredit Redwall, and since Scorri is looking into Redwall- you do not like a player thinking outside the box perhaps? oh, wait, you don't because you need to influence people.
post #861 I thought you had a plan go look into the KoTRT, and of course you want to hunt for wolves- a great way to loo more townie. Why say "Sounds good to me?" ask who does he suggest? this post to me is a bit twisted around, I do not like the wording and how this post is just confusing.
post #903- here you are back onto Vblakes. Also in this posting, "If something else comes up"- really?
this whole time up to know, you have only agreed with others as to why others are scummy- not a post yet of your own findings as to who is a good lynch or any real reasons as to why your voting. self baseless votes, why not look into others being scummy at the same time, like, perhaps the KoTRT like you said day 1- oh wait, you said there was nothing to go on for day 2 left over from day 1...........
post#905- yup, cool story it is. It is about a person who has as yet to tell any story on finding or pointing out scum in any player on your own work. You jumped on a players case earlier about with holding info, yet you do it yourself? er what? oh wait, it was all just a cool story...... it was also cool of you to divert attention away from wolfs to other win cons as a refocus.... why would you do that? oh yeah, your vote is on a possible non town non wolf win con...........
post#908- wait, between post 905 and this one- it is not safe to assume what we are facing as far as roles go? huh? 905/908- contradict much?
post # 926- back onto the roles thing again? not deciding on who is a threat or not? huh? maybe it is only me, but this whole first part of your post is just not right. Also, you say we should all be scum hunting, yet you have yet to point out actual scum yourself yet. Of course, lets go after a threat, but it looks as if you have a reason to be set out to try and eliminate anyone who is not town that threatens your wolf win-con.
(insert Waynegg fiasco here)
so post #962- your a wolf, so you do know that Waynegg is ??????? to you or townie, so here you are making a falicy with "look at DC725" why make this falicy? is it because you do fear that if people do see Waynegg as townie and you as scum, then here is a redirect attention onto DC725?
post# 966- votes Waynegg
post#1036- unvotes Waynegg, back onto Vblakes. why, don't want to get looked at for keeping a vote onto waynegg if he flips townie and is lynched? If anything, look for scum or at least contribute with some leads as to some scum so we can get a lynch onto some scum. Simply reverting back to Vblakes is a easy simple shot to get a lynch going back on again to get in your free lynch. Up to this point, I do not see any real effort on your part to actually provide any scum leads.
day 3
post 1092- you finally drop the Vblakes case. first person to vote on a player- your right there to start your wolf tactics all over again. Of course you didnt take a bit of time to wait and really see if he could explain himself. You voted right off. Bad logic? Perhaps, ut it made sence to him. I am not defending PMysterious, but I would at least give a second chance to explain himself some before just tossing a vote onto him unless he fails to give some sort of chance to speak. Wolves tend to get a bit more aggressive when they lose their free lynch. You seem to be on edge a little, and since there are multiple win-cons in the game, you wolves KNOW you got to get in your free kill at night, so I see that so far during this day, your a little bit higher on the agressive side.
post#1112- you seem to be in that "pressure question" mode that wolves tend to do. Circular type questions or questions that keep the player in the spot light. You wolves know your needing to lynch power roles, as they threaten your own win con- so the first chance at getting info on a player who even whispers a hint at a role- you wolves will question in this manner. As how I see it is all. I also think that this is not really scum hunting, it is selctive questioning that is meant to entrap a player later on, and can lead to getting more info on a player so as to not have to kill that player at night if the lynch fails- it leaves it open for a night kill/day lynch option.
post #1124- does not really help you or the town. this is just more ways to get info on a player. Sure, you can say that it is out of trying to lynch scum sort of questioning/pressure- whatever, but using a player who has leaned townie (who you know to be town as a way to look town by way of agreeing with SS7)- wolves will do this to get attention off themselves, establish a "connection" to a player who leans townie at the current posting habits/availibiltiy of said player (this case SS7), defend that player to score in some good points to come off as being a townie for defending said player.
More questions to use to "pin" a player with later on so that the player gets twisted up themselves and can easily stumble on anything they said prior to make it so they are "scum" whe you trip them up later on, especially closer to the end of the day to "seal" the lynch.
You still, up to this point have not provided ANYTHING to this town by way of scum leads. Sure, your voting, and being active and posting- but not once have you pointed anything out on your own will to provide any scum leads.
#1140- here you are unvoting PM- a player thinks PM is not a wolf- and here you are back to saying something about roles again which of course now it makes a big deal and goes against what you said prior. It is really interesting how you have managed to "mold" into the flow of the day.
#1148- falicy again, redirect to Waynegg in defending SS7, which I already said my thoughts onto as to why your selecting SS7 (leans town) multiple questions. And here is the thing- why shoot out so many questions in a string like that? Oh wait........ a string of questions like that is easy for a person to miss one, or to be able to answer them all, let alone not be able to defend every point. A great way to make that player look even more scummier later on.
#1168- here you now have 2 options- you wolves like this, and it is really an opportunity here that you immediatly jumped onto. I don't like that at all. Why not stick to one player at a time as far as "scum" goes- most town players will vote for a player before a wolf will, as per my own experiance and what I have read up on. Most wolves do not activly "scum hunt" as it is, they just need ways to blend in, look townie, and rarely ever provide scum reads of their own. You jumping on 2 people in one post with both players already questioned by other players? yeah, looks as if your looking to revoert to Pikajewl if PMystriouse doesn't pan out and the day draws to a close. You want a lynch, you don't care who, you want your free lynch on anyone.
#1196- you revote onto PMysteriouse. You have no thoughts of your own. Really? AT just up and dropped dead, and all you can think is that PMysteriouse is to blame? My own first reaction to AT dying was not- "OH, PM did it!"- nope. Not me. And sure, some one else may have said it was PM, but you didn't doubt it or take the time to think on your own. Because up until this point- you are not actually scum humting. Feeding off of another players thoughts is what I think you did to get back onto PM's case with simple ease of convience.
#1220- yup, of course you find no ones vote on PM unwarrented. With how I believe you have spoken, your actions, your failure to do active scum hunting, your endless baragge of questions which you desire for pin-point prescision, your off/on voting pattern, your sudden jump onto players, opportunistic type wording to entrap a player to get them to stumble on there own wording, trying to look townie in quite a few ways, your back and forth on contraditve postings to fit a situation, and your need to pressure for acurate reads from others - look
I could go on as to what I see in your playstyle.
I do not like what I see coming from you, your intentions, nor your style of play as it does not favor the town, whom the town looks as if they are doing the scum hunting for you as you kick back and simply "go with the flow", and trying to pass it off as being a townie.
This is what I think, this is what I see.
VOTE: SMP88
TL;DR= sorry, but I outlined my thoughts on what I see and why I think SMP88 needs to go.
