Professor Elm
Active Member
^well, it must not be that easy if u gotta think a lot
I'm just saying if you play smart you will win most of the time
I didn't say GeChamp, I said Machamp. They are two different things entirely.
Drew
I've tested against Luxape before and never lost.
Yeah, one sucks. The other is good. You figure out which is which.
Negative. Neither are very good at all.
Regardless of player skill, if this is your result, then you probably haven't played enough games of the matchup.
Not to say I disagree with you, but I find it interesting that you hold an undefeated record versus something that beat four Palkia variants in order to win the US National Championship.
Um, they are both not that great.
I agree.
See, I have to disagree. First off, Pooka beat 6 Palkia Variants, but only a handful played Azelf MT and the Toxicroak Promo. While I am not saying that changes the matchup a lot, it is an intersting fact. I still feel that Luxape is favored in the matchup aslong as they can out last the lock, but that is just me. I also think that playing smart also helps. However, this is all negated unless you get a good start.
Anyways, this is just my thoughts and they shouldn't count for anything because I haven't tested the matchup on way or another yet. I expect that it will happen in the near future however, and I can give better thoughts on the subject after I do. :biggrin:
Drew
Negative. Neither are very good at all.
FBC (feraligatr bronzong claydol) is one of the most underrated decks and I dont know why ore people dont play it. You might have to play some bubble coat for luxray but doing 80-120 a turn with energy cyclone is just so overwhelming. might not be the choice for grinder but id be very surprised if none top 4 worlds
That's twice you're wrong now
Either you are a junior or you live in a bad Pokemon area. Machamp and Gechamp are not even in my platesting, that's how bad they are.
171717
Beedril may beat Machamp, but it hardly has a good matchup vs Luxape. 30/70 imo