Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

What happened to The PokeGym?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, but while both you and TheRolesWePlay touch on what happened, you are not addressing the why. Why did so many "chose to decentralize a hub of conversation," when the infrastructure was already here? Did they just feel it was time to spread their wings and fly, try something new and add their own innovative/creative design and perspective they could not do here? That could very well be part of it.
People who went through the article submission process said it was burdensome with the amount of revision and regulation. It made writing an article not worth it and a long, drawn-out effort.
Over-moderation has been discussed many times as a problem with PokeGym. I remember one overzealous moderator felt like he had to flex his moderating power against a PTO in the PTO's own thread :eek:. That did not end well. There is one moderator in particular who is always saying something negative and incorrectly challenging posters with his own incorrect information. If he was not a moderator, he would have been infracted (or so I would like to think). There was a short time when "please don't infract me" was a way of ending posts despite the invitation to speak honestly about issues or were presenting a genuine and helpful comment that took a negative perspective.

I think there's more to it than just people getting upset at the mods. I don't really care to talk to much on the issue, but there are some known egos in the community that are very polarizing, and they have cause plenty of people to leave because of their popularity in the community. I mostly speculate that the reason for the increase in these sites varies from simply wanting a place where they won't get hounded, or a place for the 'cool kids.' (Yes I realize that sounds condescending, but I think it's important to at least note it)

I can't really say why Gym has been slower, as I've only been active on gym in more recent years. But I don't think it's solely the way gym has been handled, and it's more of the victim of conflicts regarding TPCi and what not. I've come to notice that most players aren't really sympathetic to what goes on behind the scenes, and PTOs have probably had waning patience for the complaints that have become standard with the issues, especially since they have more understanding of what's going on behind the scenes. It's a mix of respect issues and a seemingly growing (IMO unjustified) animosity towards PTOs, mods, and other forces related with TPCi.
 
Whew boy, lots of replies to reply to :)

ogremarauder mentions a great point. I recently tried to trade some Kaijudo cards on a facebook group and got scammed right away. The Kaijudo group was a public group that is pretty much the main Kaijudo group on Facebook and yet they have no reference system, no feedback system, and they do nothing to help others that get scammed. Thankfully I was able to get a chargeback from my bank.

Forums have that advantage over Facebook "chats".

Also, nothing is permanent in facebook groups. Any discussion today can be bumped so far down it disappears by tomorrow. You can never search for certain information, and there is no way to organize it.

Facebook group chat is easy for people, that is it's main incentive. So many people stay on Facebook all day that it's easy to just chat there too.

On the other hand, I go to a Heroclix forum and a Power Rangers forum that have been around for years and are very strong in their topic's world. Facebook hasn't damaged them at all.

------------------------------------------------------------------

Jaegar, I see what you were joking about. Over moderation can be a problem, and I personally apologize to anyone who has been on the blunt end of over moderation. It can be hard to orchestrate a group of staff to do their jobs in sync over the internet. It's hard enough to get judges at tournaments to give the same penalties for similar issues. What one mod feels is appropriate may be too harsh of a penalty to another mod. I don't think we will ever be able to get all the mods on the same page and have no issues whatsoever, but what the penalized person can do, if they feel they were wrongly penalized, is 1) Ask the moderator to appeal to a higher up 2) Contact a higher up themselves. Instead of getting mad, complaining in a public thread or on facebook, and leaving the forum forever, try to do something constructive about it. Mods are humans, they have bad days, and they make mistakes.

I think people hear about the worst cases of mod abuse the most because that is the only thing ever discussed. Nobody ever mentions times where mods deleted spam that was cluttering a thread, or when a mod did a good thing. People focus on the bad things and it makes it seem bad overall when it really isn't.

------------------------------------------------------------------

Shadowfox, you're information is very useful, but it won't be accessible easily in this thread. If you could PM any bugs or errors you see to Bulbasnore or myself or Eeveelover, we'd be happy to discuss them internally and see if we can fix the issues.

Why did people go away from the PokeGym? There were many reasons. One reason was because the PokeGym was considered too noobish for many of the competitive players. Many of them wanted a place where they can talk freely about anything without being penalized for it, and where only the best players would be present to discuss competitive topics. The PokeGym had to silence any topics above PG-13 because of it's connection to the official game and knowing that young kids would be visiting the site. The PokeGym just didn't have the tools and atmosphere many of the competitive players wanted.

I mentioned above one reason why over-moderation is continually discussed, because nobody discusses the good things mods do, they just focus on the bad. Over-moderation, heck moderation in general has not affected much of the members of the forum. For every 1 person that gets infracted, making up a number, there has to be 10 others that never get an infraction. It's those minority people that break the rules, get infracted, and then complain about it, that you hear about so much. And perhaps some of those people were penalized unfairly, but like I mentioned above, it's more constructive to discuss it with the mod or an admin, then complain publicly about it. Complaining publicly and bringing it up many times in the future will not change the fact that that person was penalized unfairly.

Can the mods do better? Definitely. Are all the complaints about over-moderation justified? I don't think so.

You mention stories about this mod or that mod, but I've been on this forum longer than most people, and I can't remember any of those times. I've never seen the mods as a problem on this forum, and I still don't see them as a problem.

I never said the PokeGym wasn't a centralized hub of conversation. I'm saying that is the PokeGym's main purpose and always has.

You're right that the news was a lot better back in the day. Everything was mentioned on the forum or on the front page. You didn't need to go anywhere other than the PokeGym. But to continue to post that news, it requires people to do it. And although we've had some great people throughout the years helping the PokeGym, a lot of left. We no longer have a staff member in charge of reporting the news, or tracking it down and finding it first. The PokeGym has always relied on the volunteering of it's members, and as people move on to other sites, so do many of the volunteers.

But I don't think it's a bad thing if the PokeGym can't be as strong as it was in every area. As long as it's strong in it's main purpose, as a forum, a place to talk about the news, I think it will do well. I'm not saying it's doing well now, though. That's another topic.

"It is because the rules are arbitrary, archaic, and restrictive."

Do you really think that?

While I agree some infractions can be for poor reasons, I feel as a whole, the system is better than it is worse. Maybe the staff should sit down with the players and discuss every infraction, being honest here, and see how they feel about them. If you like that idea, maybe we can get it down.

But the main goal of the infraction system is to make sure the forums don't get cluttered with junk threads, to make sure conversations stay on topic and continue on fluidly, and to make sure nobody mistreats another member. Most of the infractions cover this ideas and do nothing but try to keep things healthy around here.

"How are we encouraged to get our news elsewhere and come here to discuss it but not be allowed to link to other websites?" You're 100% right.

"A rules refresh may help change that reputation without actually changing the practice of keeping PokeGym a respectable atmosphere." Sounds like a good idea.

------------------------------------------------------------------

PokemonTrader, you bring up some good points about vagueness in the rules.

There are grey areas, and every mod does their job a little differently than the mod next to them.

We can try to improve the system.

Like I said above, if you feel you were unfairly penalized, please tell a mod or admin. I hope you did so in the past. And if you didn't, and are just now speaking about it now, then there isn't much we can do now to change what happened in the past. And perhaps if you would have spoke up in the past, it would have helped others in a similar situation.

------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for the post TheRolesWePlay, you bring up good ideas.

I'm not sure what can be done about a polarizing person on this forum. It is a public forum, so that person could show on any other public forum. As long as they aren't breaking the rules, there is little we can do about them.

------------------------------------------------------------------

I think that's all of the replies so far.

I'll keep replying to the best of my ability.
 
Prime,

Every time I do bring up points to Team Compendium they are either completely overlooked or I get scolded because I should've known better.
I've tried speaking up in the past, however then I get slandering messages from mods saying that I shouldn't report posts, that I shouldn't bother with issues and so forth.

I mean no disrespect, just that the rules do need adjusting :)
 
Example #1:
So this rule seems simple. No?
Well if you reply 4 times, you will get a yellow infraction.
HOWEVER, if you have quoted to reply to someone, THEN reply 3 more times, that is completely okay.

Does that make sense? Yes and no. It doesn't specifically state ANYWHERE in the rules that if you quote someone that it doesn't count as one of your "three" posts for bumping.

You stated it yourself - "if you have quoted to reply to someone" that is different than "replying to your own topic".
 
But wouldn't replying to someone be under the umbrella of replying to your own topic?

It isn't clear is what I'm getting at.
 
You stated it yourself - "if you have quoted to reply to someone" that is different than "replying to your own topic".
So...

Post + Post + Post + Post = bad.
Post w/quote + Post + Post + Post = okay

Is that right? Is that stated?

Also, nothing is permanent in facebook groups. Any discussion today can be bumped so far down it disappears by tomorrow. You can never search for certain information, and there is no way to organize it.
Agreed. I have a terrible time trying to find discussions on facebook groups. Also, they all look alike so I never know in which group the discussion was held.

It can be hard to orchestrate a group of staff to do their jobs in sync over the internet. It's hard enough to get judges at tournaments to give the same penalties for similar issues. What one mod feels is appropriate may be too harsh of a penalty to another mod. I don't think we will ever be able to get all the mods on the same page and have no issues whatsoever,
Makes sense.

You mention stories about this mod or that mod, but I've been on this forum longer than most people, and I can't remember any of those times. I've never seen the mods as a problem on this forum, and I still don't see them as a problem.
I turned off my PM box a long time ago but maybe I'll turn it on for a moment to PM you an instance. It happens often enough and shouldn't take too long. This one particular moderator is still active on the forums. The tone of the posts is bad enough but when he posts incorrect information, it hurts because he has a moderator title
frown.gif
. I'm not going to stalk that moderator. He is active enough that he ends up posting in threads I read. I'm a little surprised he has not yet posted in this thread.

"It is because the rules are arbitrary, archaic, and restrictive."

Do you really think that?

Arbitrary: Will I be infracted for linking to another website? Sometimes. Will I be infracted for mentioning a social media website by name? sometimes. Do these rules even make sense? (We've already discussed this.) I can understand not wanting pictures from other sites linked and I can understand a concern that a link to another website means leading people to content outside of a moderator's moderation. Couldn't that be solved by allowing the posting of the website's name? But with so many people asking for a reference of where we read the news, doesn't that mean the "no links" rule can no longer be enforced, also making such a rule archaic?

Archaic: I can't post "I need a Blastoise, does anyone have one for trade?" in a tournament thread? Players cannot discuss their needs in a thread of a tournament they plan to attend. Trading is a part of this game and doing it in the tournament thread increases the visibility and likelihood of a response. No posts about ride sharing? Does PokeGym have something against carpooling? A player needs help finding a ride to an event but they aren't allowed to ask for it? These rules have been in place since 2009. Nowadays, ride sharing is encouraged to help reduce traffic and gas consumption.

Restrictive: "Who Won/What Won Regulations" http://pokegym.net/forums/view.php?pg=wwwwregs I have to read all of that and have a chat with the moderating team to make a "who/what won" thread? Yikes!
eek.gif
Does anyone even do them anymore? Have you read the "regulations"? The tone of them is completely unwelcoming to any volunteer--the primary method on which PokeGym depends on its content--who is trying to contribute to the forum in this way. Asking one member to do all three divisions is burdensome to the extent that it is restrictive: who would want to take that on? Clearly no one since Cities 2013-2014 has concluded but the pinned thread is still the 2012-2013 series. These rules border on archaic: "Do you remember when the 15+ were banned?" The answer to that question for a lot of people will be "no." This was a real sticking point for moderators who sought to make Masters division feel unjustified in asking for acknowledgment in proportion to the other divisions. Isn't it time we let 2003 rest in the past? Especially now that TPCi has acknowledged the masters division (respectable prizes in proportion to its size, respectable product like the Elite Trainer Kits, asking for players to host streams), why keep holding this against TPCi, the players, and the volunteers here?

Thanks for keeping up with the responses, Prime!
 
Last edited:
I think the decline in pokegym has a lot more to do with the decline of the game, not so much caused by fragmentation
 
I think the decline in pokegym has a lot more to do with the decline of the game, not so much caused by fragmentation

That doesn't make much sense considering that Gym has been on the decline as the game is growing. I don't know the numbers for this year, but turn outs weren't suffering last year IIRC, in fact I remember turn outs growing in recent years. (Yes I know that the two aren't necessarily the same thing, but if it was in that much decline then turn outs wouldn't be growing)
 
So far nobody's mentioned what I think contributed to the acceleration of the fragmentation via Facebook/other websites—The somewhat lengthy downtime post-Worlds this year. While I completely understand it was necessary, it took the Pokegym out of people's "routines" for a time. Combined with the rise of other alternatives, when the Pokegym came back online, people had already moved away. The effect was likely further compounded with the change in appearance—people typically dislike adjusting to change.

Of course, this only attempts to explain the past 6-7 months of usage decline. Compounded with the other perceived issues that've been highlighted, I can't say I'm too surprised at the decline.

That doesn't make much sense considering that Gym has been on the decline as the game is growing. I don't know the numbers for this year, but turn outs weren't suffering last year IIRC, in fact I remember turn outs growing in recent years. (Yes I know that the two aren't necessarily the same thing, but if it was in that much decline then turn outs wouldn't be growing)

This year numbers are down in smaller events, and about on par once averaged at larger events.
 
Reputation of a site/group also effects site activity. The members/community with in sets the over-all atmosphere and the tone of how things are presented.
Groups/communities do not want a negative image- thus a level of moderation is needed.

It does not matter if it is FB, 'gym, Serebii, ect............ people do care about reputation and with whom they choose to be affiliated with. It is not an easy thing to do when any one group or community tries to maintain a legit reputation in being a respectable resource. This is the area IMO where some change is needed on BOTH parties of a site: staff and members.

Being a resource verses being an outlet is a tricky matter. How does one define the lines of differentiating between the two without considering reputation?

When members no longer contribute, and the site can only offer the "bare minimum" at times- the site is no longer a "we" but a "they" situation. It takes both sides to make a designed site's purpose to be at a better standing in the community to be that resource and result everyone can enjoy.

If I had my own site, posted my deck in say like for example FB- I would also post my deck in here if I was the type of person who knows that there is a resource here as well to gather input/praise/what not. But that is just me.
I would use FB for my "open atmosphere" where my closer personal friends can make fun of me and the what not- but I do not always want that type of feedback so I would come here based on this site's reputation. It would be a waste of my time to me if all I got were troll replies, jokes, rude comments on here when I know I can go elsewhere for that. Let alone know that on here vs FB my topic would at least be around longer then 4 hours.

Just saying how I see it is all-
 
So...

Post + Post + Post + Post = bad.
Post w/quote + Post + Post + Post = okay

Is that right? Is that stated?

How about

Bump + Bump + Bump + Bump = Bad

Reply + Bump + Bump + Bump = You're OK

Until you Bump again.
 
The Gym Always has been a home for those looking for correct rulings and it still is.
I see a lot of new players coming to tournaments with their fresh copied deck from "other" websites.
But at the moment things get complicated during a game they loose track.
Why? They only know the basic rules.
Starting reading on a site like this/compendium might help them to really understand the game.
 
Sorry for not replying everyone. Came home to my cat sick, had to rush him to vet, and he just got home today, so I've been pre-occupied.

Short story, we are working on improvements, we are listening to every word that is said in this thread. If you want your word to be heard, speak it here. We will unveil our plans in the future and will work with you guys to implement them.
 
Sorry for not replying everyone. Came home to my cat sick, had to rush him to vet, and he just got home today, so I've been pre-occupied.

Short story, we are working on improvements, we are listening to every word that is said in this thread. If you want your word to be heard, speak it here. We will unveil our plans in the future and will work with you guys to implement them.

This makes me happy.
 
Project #1 is revising the infractions and infraction system. Right now we're discussing internally which infractions have merit and don't. If anyone has any thoughts on them, feel free to add them here.

Project #2 is something different entirely and more information about it will be released in the future.
 
Ha!
Remember when you couldn't see the Deck section unless you were registered?

I actually began avoiding the site since the content wasn't satisfying and obviously the free speech, as a competitive player I can actually recall when people posted great reports and great articles(up to 2007 or so).

The only thing that makes me visit here is news, rulings and tournament dates and such… buying/trading section is actually great too.
 
I also noticed that the 'gym seems to be getting less traffic than what I remember... how's the player base? Do we have a significantly increasing amount of players participating in events, or has it leveled off?

I know locally (which is not a vision of the whole USA), the last few pre-releases have seen a LOT less players than usual. I remember when DRX came out we had people sitting on the floor at the pre-release because we just didn't have enough space for everyone. But PB, LT, and XY... probably half as many people I'd say.
 
I know locally (which is not a vision of the whole USA), the last few pre-releases have seen a LOT less players than usual. I remember when DRX came out we had people sitting on the floor at the pre-release because we just didn't have enough space for everyone. But PB, LT, and XY... probably half as many people I'd say.

Think about the sets. DRX had a huge hype: Dragon pokemon--many of which were already popular long before--get their own type, the promo was (or so it appeared at the time) very playable, the set had a lot of other cards to offer, like Garbodor and Tool Scrapper.

DRX PR were the last PRs that were universally $25.00. After that, there is a shift to $30. PLB, LTR, and XY... New players say it is too much. When parents and players are in agreement that an event costs too much, that pretty much ends the discussion. The player has to want to go and then convince their parents with your help. That is how we get players to go to other events.

PRs do not compare to other events. They need to be treated in the context of prereleases. If a set is weak/strong, the attendance will be weak/strong. Some people think that if you have a prerelease, everyone who showed up before has every reason to show up again as if set contents have no influence. What prereleases have going for them now is the potential for trade. This is the only event where you have so many people in the same room with the newest cards able to trade.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top