What will Win State?
- Thread starter pokemaniac93
- Start date
- Status
chriscobi634
New Member
the one card that would have balanced this format out a little is Clayol. But guess what? Gardy takes care of him. I've been saying this for sometime now, it's not that they made the Gallade broken, but they also had to make the Gardy semi-broken. If Gallade starts having any problems vs. any deck, (it usually has to be a Power deck so it can keep up with the Gardevoir) Gardy can shoot that down or at least buy some time for the next Gallade.
Like mentioned before GE gave us a lot of good cards but not really any Great cards. The people who created the cards could have done a better job, too. The flips on three good cards from GE: Togekiss, Sceptile and PorygonZ as they all deal with basic energy could have been avoided. They could have made them like Garchomp, with the whole Special energy clause. Then I think a few more people would have played with confidence and not feel uneasy about having games go down to flips.
Like mentioned before GE gave us a lot of good cards but not really any Great cards. The people who created the cards could have done a better job, too. The flips on three good cards from GE: Togekiss, Sceptile and PorygonZ as they all deal with basic energy could have been avoided. They could have made them like Garchomp, with the whole Special energy clause. Then I think a few more people would have played with confidence and not feel uneasy about having games go down to flips.
HornetsBasketballFan
Active Member
Vegeta ss4
Iron Chef Leader
Exploud is AMAZZZAAZING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
chriscobi634
New Member
you really need to stop acting like your a PTCG god or something of that sort. Here is one huge flaw I noticed in one of your "expert" analysis of a deck:
In the Kingdra Ex D forum that you got locked, you said the Magmortar could hit the Kingdra on the bench for 100. Well, why would you hit the one on the bench and not the active one? If your playing against Kingdra, most if not all of the time your opponent will have 2 Kingdras out. Reducing your 100 to 80. Not to mention that a Kingdra player will also play 3+ Bufer Piece in their deck, and a smart player can time the buffer right. Even a Noob could have spotted this. But you missed it with your expert analysis.
Thank you Ash K. Please stop bashing people or/and their deck or I will personally will defend everyone you bash and throw your own facts back at you. Since a lot of time YOU TOO have flaws in your analysis.
Me said:
I was immeadiatly shooting down a good arguement point he could have used, what if he sent up a non ex to attack me and even out the prize count so my scrambles wouldn't work as well. I shot that down by saying I would ignore his active and snipe a Kingdra on the bench. The reason I wouldn't snipe the active Kingdra is because in that scenario, he doesn't HAVE an active Kingdra
I care? Buffer one Kingdra, I smack the other. With 4 Kingdra out, I need 9 energies to take it out. Thats 2 active scrambles and three fire. What if he has buffer? I suppose dropping one more fire is out of the question? Or windstorming it away? Or powering up a Typlosion to come up, hit for a little, knowing that he will not be able to one shot me, then trying next turn to get a windstorm for the next bufferpiece?
Honestly, I will sit there with a Magmortar with 2 scrambles and three fire on it on the bench, and send up a mag with three fire to deal minor damage to you. If you kill me, I will wipe your existance off the face of the earth. If you don't, I will simply level up after badly injuring your active, and spank a bench kingdra. If after a while you don't take me out, I will simply kill you, since I lowered your Kingdra's down considerably. I will have one magmortar with a pile of energy on it, and if nessesary will trade my mags for your kingdras for the rest of the game.
Incidently, a deck that plays powers obviously has windstorm or warp point to deal with cessasion crystal. A n00b could have shot you down, but you evidently failed to notice that. Oops?
Don't try to outwit me if you have no idea what you are talking about, I will rip you to shreds every time.
chriscobi634
New Member
you assume too much for knowing too little.
Your back and forth scenarios don't mean **** to me. You can never predict how a game will go. You can never predict how a list will be built. So think before you type next time.
Where you the person who asked "Who or what deck plays Cess. Crystal?"
Whoops.
I don't need to know how the entire game will go silly, I just need to know every single play my opponent can make. And in this case, I did. If I didn't, you would have taken the time to point out what I missed, and you didn't, did you?
And if my scenario's don't mean anything to you, I am quite afraid you are talking to the wrong person, because frankly my dear, I don't give a damn. I just told you every play you could make once we are both setup, and every move I can make to counter it. If you do something unexpected or I get a run of bad luck, I will work around it. I am quite capable of thinking on my feet, and am not remotely worried about that happening.
If you have a VALID point to make in your next post, please make it. Otherwise, I bid thee a good day.
And as for what decks play Cess? Random silly ones, or ones better players than myself play. Windstorm also counters Crystal Beach, which also kills the deck. Your move.
chriscobi634
New Member
Here is a valid point:
You go into a lot of threads posting withing 5 minutes in each without really thinking about what your typing. Your only objective is to look smart or something like that. As you tend to contradict yourself a lot.
First you say
"What deck would play Cess. Crystal?" (I believe it was in your Flygon Ex thread)
Then you come into another argument like this one and point out how you run Windstorm in your Magmortar to counter Cess. Crystal.
Good enough?
Back to back posts merged. The following information has been added:
the reason I put it on the threads instead of PMs is so that everyone else can see how this kid acts. If they haven't noticed already.
Sorry for "ruining" another thread but someone has to stop this kid.
You go into a lot of threads posting withing 5 minutes in each without really thinking about what your typing. Your only objective is to look smart or something like that. As you tend to contradict yourself a lot.
First you say
"What deck would play Cess. Crystal?" (I believe it was in your Flygon Ex thread)
Then you come into another argument like this one and point out how you run Windstorm in your Magmortar to counter Cess. Crystal.
Good enough?
Back to back posts merged. The following information has been added:
the reason I put it on the threads instead of PMs is so that everyone else can see how this kid acts. If they haven't noticed already.
Sorry for "ruining" another thread but someone has to stop this kid.
Last edited:
True, I did contradict myself, you have that point taken. Take out Cessasion Crystal, and put in Crystal Beach. Now talk about that one
Trying to look smart? If I were trying to look smart, I wouldn't be conceding the point to you, I would bring up some farflung BS to fling at you. I am not trying to look smart, I am bieng a complete and total ***, throwing the occasional helping of people in with it to mix things up. See the difference now?
This thread has hardly been ruined, I see a simple debate going on. Now if one of us were to degrade ourselves to the level of insulting the other, then yes, the arguement would need to cease immeadiatly.
Unless I am missing something Prime, I see nothing wrong with a good point and counterpoint arguement.
chriscobi634
New Member
Do you see the difference?
Do I see the difference that I conceded the point after I realized "Oops, I am wrong"? Obviously.
Do you see now you are focusing on tiny insignificant points and changing the subject rather than continuing our previous discussion, to which I am waiting for an answer?
SPARTA, what does your little "counterpoint" argument have to do with the deck that will win state? This isn't the only thread where this has occurred either. This will be my last warning. Take your bickering to PM or get back on topic. The same goes for too Chris.
That literally made my day. I love this forum.
That is, as may be. However, as Prime says, report posts. Taking 'thread control' or 'member control' into a member to member intimidation level gets out of hand. With reporting, things don't escalate to the point where 1) a lot of people get infractions and 2) only members who love arguing and bickering keep posting.
Personally attacking members is against the rules here, no matter how justified. In saying this, no one should feel singled out... just saying its happening enough to draw this comment, and it should stop.
- Status