Pokémon TCG: Sword and Shield—Brilliant Stars

Why I'm Voting for Barry

PokeDad said:
Are you purposely wrong in every post you make regarding the election?

You've been called out on a number of ridiculous assertions in previous posts and instead of providing credible sources or citations with links, you move on to a new blatantly false, or otherwise flawed, series of statements.

http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/summary.php?cid=N00009638

91% of Sen. Obama's contributions between 2003-2008 were from individual contributors.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7678674.stm

The average amount of Sen. Obama's donations came in at $86.

http://www.barackobama.com/taxes/

Sen. Obama is not going to raise all taxes. 95% of Americans, and 99.9% of plumbers will see no increase, or a decrease, in their taxes under Sen. Obama's plan.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/Story?id=5417864&page=1

Even Texas simpleton George Bush, after Sen. Obama advocated it in numerous speeches, had talks this year with Iran and North Korea (good people with bad leaders - kind of like America Jan 21, 2001- Jan 20, 2008).

http://factcheck.barackobama.com/factcheck/2008/06/30/washington_times_wrong_on_obam.php

The Chicago Tribune reported, "'For more than 20 years, Illinois law has required that when 'there is a reasonable likelihood of sustained survival of the fetus outside the womb, with or without artificial support,' an abortion may only be performed if a physician believes 'it is necessary to preserve the life or health of the mother.' And in such cases, the law requires that the doctor use the technique 'most likely to preserve the life and health of the fetus' and perform the abortion in the presence of 'a physician other than the physician performing or inducing the abortion who shall take control of and provide immediate medical care for any child born alive as a result of the abortion.'" [Chicago Tribune, 8/17/04]
Obama voted against the unnecessary bill (born alive already protected by existing law) because the state bill, unlike the federal bill he supported, had language that could be used to undermine Roe v. Wade.

http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post_group/ObamaHQ/CZsK
Sen. Obama agrees with Supreme Court Ginsburg that the current Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act disregards prior judicial rulings respecting a woman's medical concerns in consultation with her doctor.

When the health of the woman is at risk, Sen. McCain and a majority of the male Supreme Court Justices see women as merely an expendable incubator.

You are a sweet, nice, interesting woman. I enjoyed chatting briefly with you in Orlando this year. Having said that, you are woefully lacking in supporting evidence for your political assertions, many are factually incorrect, while others rely on faulty logic, or seem to confuse the appropriate candidate to excoriate for the positions you cite as dear.

Links to other posts refuting some of your political assertions:

http://pokegym.net/forums/showpost.php?p=1241027&postcount=25

http://pokegym.net/forums/showpost.php?p=1241458&postcount=8

http://pokegym.net/forums/showpost.php?p=1241517&postcount=53
Click to expand...

If you think a candidate running for presidency can get a lot of money with out big supporters/ and or lobbyists. Wow.

Many Companies and groups have Rndorsed the guy, and probably gave him money. ex: that Planned Parent hood Woman who spoke at his nomination, [she made me mad lol]
 
um, every single person making a campaign contribution has to fill out info on who they are, who their employer is, etc.

'mom
 
homeofmew said:
If you think a candidate running for presidency can get a lot of money with out big supporters/ and or lobbyists. Wow.

Many Companies and groups have Rndorsed the guy, and probably gave him money. ex: that Planned Parent hood Woman who spoke at his nomination, [she made me mad lol]
Click to expand...

After providing citations for every fact debunking your sourceless assertions, you respond with another baseless unsubstantiated opinion masquerading as information.

Soft.
 
what i don't get is he plans to tax the upper class yet many of the wealthy companies support him.
loopholes?
 
PokemansForGeeks said:
Isn't the whole point of our taxation system for the common good?

Awwwww....And I'm sorry that I embarass you. Need a hug?
Click to expand...

It's not that, you wanna argue with the right so bad? Stop throwing the same liberal argument at them, you're getting into this endless loop that doesn't get anyone everywhere. They're talking about individual rights, you're talking about the common good, and since both of them are exclusive to each other, you polarize the issue by saying that taxation is for the common good. Figure out a way where taxation is better for individual benefit, then maybe they'll agree with you
 
Tina,
The reason that many wealthy Americans support Obama: many of the wealthy know that trickle down doesn't work, and they have suffered financially under Bush/McCain economic control.

By moving back to a pre-Bush, Clinton era (you remember him, he was the president with a budget surplus and he was the president paying down the debt, boy I miss the business environment he provided) tax rate of 36% (up only 3% from the current 33%) on those families making over $250,000 NET. By allowing 95% of Americans to pay no more, or less, in taxes, more money will be available to be spent. This means that the wealthy can sell their stuff and make money.

Percolate up economics work better than the failed economic theory foisted on America by Laffer, Greenspan, Bush, Graham, and McCain.

Demand side > supply side.
 
Wait wait wait....how is taxation good for an indivual in any situation? You just LOST MONEY.

Therefore, why would the other side be for taxes of any kind?
 
Because you'll make more money than you'll lose if the economic polices are set correctly. Clinton got it right.
 
Magnechu said:
I think all of you that dismiss the " 14. Palin is an idiot." point are ignorant. I'm not sure if you've heard the news, but I think last time I heard it, 50% or more of the population disapprove of Sarah Palin. So, honestly, I think the republicans DO need to address the point.

I don't know if she is an idiot or not, but all signs point to yes, she is. At least that's what the media has told me. Now, I'm not saying their right, but I haven't heard much positive for Palin from any republicans lately.

So, I believe Alex has a good point, not one for all of you to dismiss so easily.
Click to expand...

Then why is Palin's approval rating the highest of any governer in the entire U.S. right now?
 
Believe it or not money taken from many individuals in the form of taxes and used as large sums actually can accomplish good things and help the economy as a whole. Individuals benefit when the economy is good and make even more money.

I’m totally against a lot of the wasteful spending that goes on in DC but I don’t confuse individual examples of bad spending as proof that the system itself is flawed.
 
meditite rox said:
Then why is Palin's approval rating the highest of any governer in the entire U.S. right now?
Click to expand...

Look at the population of Alaska. 700,000 eskimos that live and die in the name of the Iditarod. That's like asking a room full of Jewish kids if they like their rabbi when they're being taught in a Catholic prep school.

Look at her national approval rating....hmmmm, not so good lookin'.
 
Oh, that approval rating, could it be that she gives free money to Alaskans, paid for by oil revenues? Talk about government handouts...
 
Articjedi said:
Oh, that approval rating, could it be that she gives free money to Alaskans, paid for by oil revenues? Talk about government handouts...
Click to expand...

Ummmmm. . . .that would actually be the Alaska Permanent Fund, which was established in 1976, roughly about the time Sarah Palin was finishing up middle school (or junior high, depending on what part of the country you're from).
 
PokemansForGeeks said:
Look at the population of Alaska. 700,000 eskimos that live and die in the name of the Iditarod. That's like asking a room full of Jewish kids if they like their rabbi when they're being taught in a Catholic prep school.

Look at her national approval rating....hmmmm, not so good lookin'.
Click to expand...

Good job. You have now insulted everyone living in Alaska AND Texas now. >_>
 
Yah, but she raised the benefits of that fund by $1200, when everyone was averaging $2000 per year. Ugh, I'd like to find the new yorker article that had it, now it's not online.
 
Spotter said:
Ummmmm. . . .that would actually be the Alaska Permanent Fund, which was established in 1976, roughly about the time Sarah Palin was finishing up middle school (or junior high, depending on what part of the country you're from).
Click to expand...

I agree that to credit Palin for the Alaska Permanent Fund, started roughly when Palin was finishing up middle school, is ludicrous.

Do you think that attempts to tie Sen Obama to Ayres' terrorist acts, committed roughly when Sen. Obama was in elementary school, are pathetic and beneath the consideration of intelligent voters, meant only to influence and sway the stupidest among us?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top