meganium45
Active Member
Jimmy/Rob and the rest. In looking over the decks and the choices, how can you rationally decide it is acceptable to ban two of the cards (Sableye and Poketurn) which I AGREE need to be banned or restricted, and leave the felon out to roam (Uxie).
Removing all 3 of the cards from the game - Sableye, Poketurn and Uxie, would restore some balance to the force, and if you could only remove two - you would have to leave the Poketurn in.
Sableye and Uxie are the problem. Spritomb is a "partial" solution, but not a complete solution.
Without the engine, power, and FTKO ability of Sableye and Uxie, I think we would give evolution decks a bump, and certainly encourage longer games.
If the goal is to remove the shortest of short term games, which is the donk, which WILL drive people from the game, then Sableye and Uxie are the enemy. I will give up my consistant draw pixie to fix the format.
Vince
Removing all 3 of the cards from the game - Sableye, Poketurn and Uxie, would restore some balance to the force, and if you could only remove two - you would have to leave the Poketurn in.
Sableye and Uxie are the problem. Spritomb is a "partial" solution, but not a complete solution.
Without the engine, power, and FTKO ability of Sableye and Uxie, I think we would give evolution decks a bump, and certainly encourage longer games.
If the goal is to remove the shortest of short term games, which is the donk, which WILL drive people from the game, then Sableye and Uxie are the enemy. I will give up my consistant draw pixie to fix the format.
Vince