I judged the BR today, and I heard that the one in Dayton was won by a Sabledonk list, but can't first hand confirm that.
I think a great example of how bad this format has become comes down to this. Round 3, within ten minutes, all but 3 matches were finished in Masters. A huge number of games finished well under the 10 minute mark the entire day. Often half. Now, considering BEFORE these rules, a ton of games were going near the 30 minute mark, and a lot going to turns, this is a HUGE change that is hard to ignore. Interpret the meaning behind that all you want, but I don't see these quick games being healthy, hard fought wins. They appeared to all be lopsided rollings, and often not due to skill at all. Seeing how a good, hard fought even game SHOULD take the full 30 minutes in this format ( a full game didn't get any " quicker " ) the fact that about half of the games are over within 10 means that a LOT of those are NOT healthy games.
We had an absurd amount of Gyarados decks, and Gyarados won Juniors, Seniors, and Masters. I believe it also took 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, and 6th in Masters. 3rd was a Magnezone Regirock deck that fed off of Gyarados nearly every round as well.
The issue isn't just the deck "Sabledonk" because that never was the problem. Everyone decided to make it the poster child term for the problem these rules implement, when in reality, while it is the best example of a deck able to make the most absurd turn one kills, it isn't really a tournament winning deck. Sableye, and the HUGE boon to going first, coupled with the nerf to rare candy, makes it so that more god starts happen from SP decks, Gyarados in particular ( BTS is abusive beyond belief. The Rare Candy nerf, and t1 trainers were NOT meant to be enforced in a format where Broken Time Space was still legal. Same with Sableye. ) and stage 2 decks are even FURTHER handicapped.
Whoever opened with Sableye either won on the first turn, or generally had such an absurd start that they were bound to win quickly thereafter. I think the next BRs I'll be going to, I'll make some observations. I want to jot down the win % of players who open with Sableye vs those who do not. I guarantee the #s will be staggering.
Whats even more frightening is that the decks being used at the BR I played at didn't even fully capitalize on the degeneracy of what can be done in this format. A lot of people merely ported over their Regionals decks, added 4 Sableye, and played. The results were STILL imbalanced, and this isn't even with deck lists fully abusing what is possible.
I think I heard the guy who took 2nd at our BR say that his finals game 1 was the only "real" game he played all day out of 7 rounds.